Classifying handwriting samples according to their type using discriminant analysis

Q4 Medicine
Jagoda Dzida
{"title":"Classifying handwriting samples according to their type using discriminant analysis","authors":"Jagoda Dzida","doi":"10.4467/12307483pfs.22.013.17686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Classifying handwriting samples according to their type (i.e. natural, disguised, traced, simulated or unintentionally unnatural) is an important task in handwriting analysis. It may facilitate the collection of writing standards and also help experts to assess the differences between questioned material and comparative samples or to choose the best writing features and the most relevant examination protocol for the case. Current research aimed to create a method for classifying the type of a handwriting sample using discriminant analysis. Five basic types (i.e. natural, disguised, traced, simulated and unintentionally unnatural) and some subtypes were included in this study. Participants (N = 139) wrote their full signatures, fictional signatures or a short sentence. Motor and dimensional features were assessed. The methods proved to be more than twice as accurate in classifying samples according to their type than a random choice probability (e.g. 44% as opposed to 17% for the 6-types classifier). This proof-of-a-concept study demonstrates that handwriting samples may be classified according to their type with satisfying accuracy based on their writing features and statistical tools of discriminant analysis. However, further studies are necessary to improve the accuracy of the method.","PeriodicalId":52546,"journal":{"name":"Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4467/12307483pfs.22.013.17686","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Classifying handwriting samples according to their type (i.e. natural, disguised, traced, simulated or unintentionally unnatural) is an important task in handwriting analysis. It may facilitate the collection of writing standards and also help experts to assess the differences between questioned material and comparative samples or to choose the best writing features and the most relevant examination protocol for the case. Current research aimed to create a method for classifying the type of a handwriting sample using discriminant analysis. Five basic types (i.e. natural, disguised, traced, simulated and unintentionally unnatural) and some subtypes were included in this study. Participants (N = 139) wrote their full signatures, fictional signatures or a short sentence. Motor and dimensional features were assessed. The methods proved to be more than twice as accurate in classifying samples according to their type than a random choice probability (e.g. 44% as opposed to 17% for the 6-types classifier). This proof-of-a-concept study demonstrates that handwriting samples may be classified according to their type with satisfying accuracy based on their writing features and statistical tools of discriminant analysis. However, further studies are necessary to improve the accuracy of the method.
基于判别分析的笔迹样本分类
根据笔迹类型(自然、伪装、描摹、模拟或非自然)对笔迹样本进行分类是笔迹分析中的一项重要任务。它可以促进写作标准的收集,也可以帮助专家评估被质疑材料和比较样本之间的差异,或者选择最佳的写作特征和最相关的审查方案。目前的研究旨在创建一种方法来分类类型的笔迹样本使用判别分析。本研究包括自然型、伪装型、描摹型、模拟型和无意非自然型五种基本类型及其部分亚型。139名参与者分别写下完整的签名、虚构的签名或简短的句子。评估运动和尺寸特征。事实证明,这些方法根据样本的类型对样本进行分类的准确率是随机选择概率的两倍多(例如,44%,而6种分类器的准确率为17%)。这一概念验证研究表明,笔迹样本可以根据其写作特征和判别分析的统计工具进行分类,并具有令人满意的准确性。然而,为了提高该方法的准确性,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych
Z Zagadnien Nauk Sadowych Medicine-Pathology and Forensic Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信