Multicentre external validation of the GES score for predicting HCC risk in Japanese HCV patients who achieved SVR following DAAs

Kazumichi Abe, Masashi Fujita, Manabu Hayashi, Atsushi Takahashi, Hiromasa Ohira, Nabiel Mikhail, Reham Soliman, Gamal Shiha
{"title":"Multicentre external validation of the GES score for predicting HCC risk in Japanese HCV patients who achieved SVR following DAAs","authors":"Kazumichi Abe,&nbsp;Masashi Fujita,&nbsp;Manabu Hayashi,&nbsp;Atsushi Takahashi,&nbsp;Hiromasa Ohira,&nbsp;Nabiel Mikhail,&nbsp;Reham Soliman,&nbsp;Gamal Shiha","doi":"10.1002/lci2.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A simple score combining clinical and biochemical parameters (general evaluation score (GES)) has shown value in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk after hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication in Egyptian patients with HCV genotype 4. We aimed to apply the GES to predict HCC risk in Japanese HCV patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) following direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). This multicentre retrospective cohort study included 187 HCV patients without a history of HCC treatment who achieved SVR. The GES was calculated using pre- and post-treatment data. The median age of the patients was 66 years; 49% were male, 89% had cirrhosis and 69% had HCV genotype 1. During the mean 36-month follow-up, 19 (10.2%) developed HCC. Regarding the pretreatment scores, 75 (40.1%), 58 (31.0%) and 54 (28.9%) patients had low-, intermediate- and high-risk scores, respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence (CumI) was 1.64% in the low-risk group, 2.82% in the intermediate-risk group and 6.88% in the high-risk group (log-rank <i>P</i> = .029). In patients with cirrhosis, 60 (36.1%), 57 (34.3%) and 49 (29.5%) had low-, intermediate- and high-risk scores respectively. The 4-year CumI was 0.98% in the low-risk group, 2.86% in the intermediate-risk group and 6.67% in the high-risk group (log-rank <i>P</i> = .02). The GES calculated with pretreatment data was more useful than that calculated with post-treatment data (Harrell's C statistic: 0.670 vs 0.587). This tool incorporates changes over time to estimate variations in HCC risk and could help identify low-risk patients for whom HCC surveillance can be discontinued.</p>","PeriodicalId":93331,"journal":{"name":"Liver cancer international","volume":"2 3","pages":"102-109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/lci2.41","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Liver cancer international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lci2.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A simple score combining clinical and biochemical parameters (general evaluation score (GES)) has shown value in predicting hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk after hepatitis C virus (HCV) eradication in Egyptian patients with HCV genotype 4. We aimed to apply the GES to predict HCC risk in Japanese HCV patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR) following direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). This multicentre retrospective cohort study included 187 HCV patients without a history of HCC treatment who achieved SVR. The GES was calculated using pre- and post-treatment data. The median age of the patients was 66 years; 49% were male, 89% had cirrhosis and 69% had HCV genotype 1. During the mean 36-month follow-up, 19 (10.2%) developed HCC. Regarding the pretreatment scores, 75 (40.1%), 58 (31.0%) and 54 (28.9%) patients had low-, intermediate- and high-risk scores, respectively. The 4-year cumulative incidence (CumI) was 1.64% in the low-risk group, 2.82% in the intermediate-risk group and 6.88% in the high-risk group (log-rank P = .029). In patients with cirrhosis, 60 (36.1%), 57 (34.3%) and 49 (29.5%) had low-, intermediate- and high-risk scores respectively. The 4-year CumI was 0.98% in the low-risk group, 2.86% in the intermediate-risk group and 6.67% in the high-risk group (log-rank P = .02). The GES calculated with pretreatment data was more useful than that calculated with post-treatment data (Harrell's C statistic: 0.670 vs 0.587). This tool incorporates changes over time to estimate variations in HCC risk and could help identify low-risk patients for whom HCC surveillance can be discontinued.

Abstract Image

在DAAs后达到SVR的日本HCV患者中,GES评分用于预测HCC风险的多中心外部验证
结合临床和生化参数的简单评分(一般评价评分(GES))在预测埃及HCV基因型4的丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)根除后的肝细胞癌(HCC)风险方面显示出价值。我们的目的是应用GES来预测直接作用抗病毒药物(DAAs)后获得持续病毒学反应(SVR)的日本HCV患者的HCC风险。这项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了187例无HCC治疗史且达到SVR的HCV患者。使用治疗前和治疗后的数据计算GES。患者年龄中位数为66岁;49%为男性,89%为肝硬化,69%为HCV基因1型。在平均36个月的随访中,19例(10.2%)发生HCC。在预处理评分方面,75例(40.1%)、58例(31.0%)和54例(28.9%)患者分别获得低、中、高风险评分。低危组的4年累积发病率(CumI)为1.64%,中危组为2.82%,高危组为6.88% (log - rank P = 0.029)。在肝硬化患者中,分别有60例(36.1%)、57例(34.3%)和49例(29.5%)为低、中、高风险评分。低危组的4年CumI为0.98%,中危组为2.86%,高危组为6.67% (log - rank P = 0.02)。使用预处理数据计算的GES比使用处理后数据计算的GES更有用(Harrell’s C统计量:0.670 vs 0.587)。该工具结合了随时间的变化来估计HCC风险的变化,并可以帮助识别可以停止HCC监测的低风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信