Experience-Based Competency Training in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy

IF 0.6 4区心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL

Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1026/1616-3443/a000635

J. Ehrenthal, Johannes Clauss, Alexandra von Tettenborn, C. Reck

{"title":"Experience-Based Competency Training in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy","authors":"J. Ehrenthal, Johannes Clauss, Alexandra von Tettenborn, C. Reck","doi":"10.1026/1616-3443/a000635","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Background: Compared to adult psychotherapy training, there is little knowledge about the use of standardized actor-patients (SPs) for the development of professional competencies for younger patient populations. Objective: We assessed the effectiveness of two university-based training programs for diagnostic as well as intervention skills in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Methods: Psychology students took part in two courses on the development of diagnostic competencies ( N = 59) and on intervention skills ( N = 51). We applied active and experience-based learning strategies, including exercises on self-awareness, mindfulness, peer role-play, and the use of SPs. Competence gain as well as a general evaluation of the seminars were assessed by self-report. Results: For both seminars, self-reported competence increased significantly with a large effect. The retrospective evaluation of learning success and acceptance ratings of the didactic formats were high. Conclusions: Experience-based trainings that include SPs are a feasible option for child and adolescent psychotherapy. The findings are discussed from a conceptual as well as a practical perspective.","PeriodicalId":46502,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1026/1616-3443/a000635","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract. Background: Compared to adult psychotherapy training, there is little knowledge about the use of standardized actor-patients (SPs) for the development of professional competencies for younger patient populations. Objective: We assessed the effectiveness of two university-based training programs for diagnostic as well as intervention skills in child and adolescent psychotherapy. Methods: Psychology students took part in two courses on the development of diagnostic competencies ( N = 59) and on intervention skills ( N = 51). We applied active and experience-based learning strategies, including exercises on self-awareness, mindfulness, peer role-play, and the use of SPs. Competence gain as well as a general evaluation of the seminars were assessed by self-report. Results: For both seminars, self-reported competence increased significantly with a large effect. The retrospective evaluation of learning success and acceptance ratings of the didactic formats were high. Conclusions: Experience-based trainings that include SPs are a feasible option for child and adolescent psychotherapy. The findings are discussed from a conceptual as well as a practical perspective.

查看原文本刊更多论文

基于经验的儿童青少年心理治疗能力训练

摘要背景:与成人心理治疗培训相比，人们对使用标准化行为者-患者(SPs)来发展年轻患者群体的专业能力知之甚少。目的:我们评估了两个以大学为基础的儿童和青少年心理治疗诊断和干预技能培训项目的有效性。方法:59名心理学专业学生参加诊断能力发展课程和51名干预技能课程。我们采用了主动和基于经验的学习策略，包括自我意识、正念、同伴角色扮演和SPs的使用。以自我报告的方式评估能力增益和研讨会的总体评价。结果:在两场研讨会上，自我报告能力显著提高，且效果显著。对学习成功的回顾性评价和对教学形式的接受度评分较高。结论:以经验为基础的培训，包括SPs是儿童和青少年心理治疗的可行选择。研究结果从概念和实践的角度进行了讨论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Zeitschrift Fur Klinische Psychologie Und Psychotherapie PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs) zugleich Organ der Fachgruppen Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie in der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie (DGPs), der Sektion Klinische Psychologie im Berufsverband Deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen (BDP), der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Verhaltenstherapie e.V. (DGVT), der Gesellschaft für wissenschaftliche Gesprächspsychotherapie e.V. (GWG), der Sektion Klinische Psychologie im Berufsverband Österreichischer Psychologinnen und Psychologen (B.Ö.P.) und der Arbeitsgemeinschaft für VerhaltensModifikation e.V. (AVM)