Bone health risk assessment in a clinical setting: an evaluation of a new screening tool for active populations

N. Keay, G. Francis, K. Hind
{"title":"Bone health risk assessment in a clinical setting: an evaluation of a new screening tool for active populations","authors":"N. Keay, G. Francis, K. Hind","doi":"10.1101/2020.08.07.20170142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Risk factors for poor bone health are not restricted to older, sedentary populations for whom current screening is focused. Furthermore, access to dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning can be limited in clinical practice. The purpose of the current study was to develop a bone health-screening tool suitable for inclusion of both younger and active populations, combined with radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry technology (REMS). Methodology 88 participants attending a physiotherapy clinic in the UK were recruited to the study: 71 women (mean age 41.5 SD 14.0 years); 17 men (mean age 40.2 SD 14.9 years). Participants completed an online bone health-screening questionnaire developed specifically for this study covering a range of lifestyle, physiological and medical factors and received bone mineral density (BMD) measurement at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using REMS. Results Scoring of the bone health-screening questionnaire produced a distribution of bone health scores, with lower scores suggesting a higher risk for poor bone health. In women, scores ranged from -10 to +12, mean score 2.2 (SD 4.8). In men, scores ranged from 0 to 12, mean score 6.9 (SD 3.2). A positive correlation was observed between the bone health score derived from the questionnaire and lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD Z-scores (p<0.01). 3 Conclusions This new and comprehensive bone health-screening questionnaire was effective in identifying active individuals at risk of bone fragility, who might be missed by current screening methods. In addition, the use of REMS technology to measure bone health, was feasible in the clinical setting. Key words: Bone health; Risk; Screening; Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS)","PeriodicalId":93216,"journal":{"name":"MOJ sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MOJ sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.07.20170142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Risk factors for poor bone health are not restricted to older, sedentary populations for whom current screening is focused. Furthermore, access to dual X-ray absorptiometry scanning can be limited in clinical practice. The purpose of the current study was to develop a bone health-screening tool suitable for inclusion of both younger and active populations, combined with radiofrequency echographic multi spectrometry technology (REMS). Methodology 88 participants attending a physiotherapy clinic in the UK were recruited to the study: 71 women (mean age 41.5 SD 14.0 years); 17 men (mean age 40.2 SD 14.9 years). Participants completed an online bone health-screening questionnaire developed specifically for this study covering a range of lifestyle, physiological and medical factors and received bone mineral density (BMD) measurement at the lumbar spine and femoral neck using REMS. Results Scoring of the bone health-screening questionnaire produced a distribution of bone health scores, with lower scores suggesting a higher risk for poor bone health. In women, scores ranged from -10 to +12, mean score 2.2 (SD 4.8). In men, scores ranged from 0 to 12, mean score 6.9 (SD 3.2). A positive correlation was observed between the bone health score derived from the questionnaire and lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD Z-scores (p<0.01). 3 Conclusions This new and comprehensive bone health-screening questionnaire was effective in identifying active individuals at risk of bone fragility, who might be missed by current screening methods. In addition, the use of REMS technology to measure bone health, was feasible in the clinical setting. Key words: Bone health; Risk; Screening; Radiofrequency Echographic Multi Spectrometry (REMS)
临床环境中的骨健康风险评估:一种新的活动人群筛查工具的评估
摘要引言骨骼健康状况不佳的风险因素并不局限于目前筛查重点关注的老年、久坐人群。此外,在临床实践中,使用双X射线吸收仪扫描可能会受到限制。本研究的目的是开发一种适用于年轻和活跃人群的骨骼健康筛查工具,并结合射频回波多光谱技术(REMS)。方法88名在英国物理治疗诊所就诊的参与者被招募到该研究中:71名女性(平均年龄41.5 SD 14.0岁);17名男性(平均年龄40.2 SD 14.9岁)。参与者完成了专门为本研究开发的在线骨健康筛查问卷,涵盖了一系列生活方式、生理和医学因素,并使用REMS测量了腰椎和股骨颈的骨密度。结果骨健康筛查问卷的评分产生了骨健康评分的分布,评分越低,表明骨健康状况不佳的风险越高。女性的得分在-10到+12之间,平均得分为2.2(SD 4.8)。男性的得分在0到12之间,平均得分6.9(SD 3.2)。问卷得出的骨健康评分与腰椎和股骨颈BMD Z评分呈正相关(p<0.01)。3结论这种新的、全面的骨健康筛查问卷能够有效地识别出有骨脆性风险的活跃个体,而目前的筛查方法可能会遗漏这些个体。此外,使用REMS技术测量骨骼健康在临床环境中是可行的。关键词:骨骼健康;危险筛查;射频回波多光谱法(REMS)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信