Impact of some ingredients and the processing method on composition and quality of probiotic Labneh

N. Mehanna, S. Salama, M. Arafa
{"title":"Impact of some ingredients and the processing method on composition and quality of probiotic Labneh","authors":"N. Mehanna, S. Salama, M. Arafa","doi":"10.25083/RBL/26.3/2587.2593","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to produce probiotic Labneh by following the probiotic bacteria counts in the presence of yoghurt starter culture and some ingredients used in making Labneh with two different methods. Probiotic Labneh was prepared by the traditional method (TM) and direct formulation method (DFM). In both methods, used skim milk powder (SMP) for treatments (A and C), while used a mixture (1:1) of whey powder (WP) and whey protein concentrate (WPC) was used for treatments (B and D). The results indicated that total solid (TS), fat, protein and ash had the lowest values (P≤0.05) in B treatment, whereas the differences between the rest treatments were insignificant (P<0.05). Labneh made using the DFM had the lowest values for carbohydrate content and acidity and the highest pH values. The counts of Bifidobacteria and L. acidophilus were not influenced by the ingredients used or by the method applied for making the product. All fresh and stored Labneh had more than 6 log CFU/g for probiotic bacteria. Organoleptically, the general appearance, consistency and flavour of bio-Labneh were not significantly influenced by the applied treatments or by the manufacturing method but a gradual decrease in their scoring points were recorded with advancing storage period.","PeriodicalId":21566,"journal":{"name":"Romanian Biotechnological Letters","volume":"26 1","pages":"2587-2593"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanian Biotechnological Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25083/RBL/26.3/2587.2593","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to produce probiotic Labneh by following the probiotic bacteria counts in the presence of yoghurt starter culture and some ingredients used in making Labneh with two different methods. Probiotic Labneh was prepared by the traditional method (TM) and direct formulation method (DFM). In both methods, used skim milk powder (SMP) for treatments (A and C), while used a mixture (1:1) of whey powder (WP) and whey protein concentrate (WPC) was used for treatments (B and D). The results indicated that total solid (TS), fat, protein and ash had the lowest values (P≤0.05) in B treatment, whereas the differences between the rest treatments were insignificant (P<0.05). Labneh made using the DFM had the lowest values for carbohydrate content and acidity and the highest pH values. The counts of Bifidobacteria and L. acidophilus were not influenced by the ingredients used or by the method applied for making the product. All fresh and stored Labneh had more than 6 log CFU/g for probiotic bacteria. Organoleptically, the general appearance, consistency and flavour of bio-Labneh were not significantly influenced by the applied treatments or by the manufacturing method but a gradual decrease in their scoring points were recorded with advancing storage period.
部分成分及加工方法对益生菌Labneh组成及品质的影响
本研究旨在通过在酸奶发酵剂培养基和用两种不同方法制作Labneh时使用的一些成分的存在下,跟踪益生菌计数,来生产益生菌Labneh。采用传统方法(TM)和直接配方法(DFM)制备益生菌Labneh。在这两种方法中,使用脱脂奶粉(SMP)进行处理(A和C),而使用乳清粉(WP)和乳清蛋白浓缩物(WPC)的混合物(1:1)进行治疗(B和D)。结果表明,总固体(TS)、脂肪、蛋白质和灰分在B处理中最低(P≤0.05),其余处理之间差异不显著(P<0.05)。双歧杆菌和嗜酸乳杆菌的计数不受所用成分或产品制造方法的影响。所有新鲜和储存的Labneh的益生菌均超过6 log CFU/g。从感官上看,bio-Labneh的总体外观、稠度和风味没有受到所用处理或制造方法的显著影响,但随着储存期的延长,其得分逐渐下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Romanian Biotechnological Letters
Romanian Biotechnological Letters 生物-生物工程与应用微生物
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信