Impacts of Wire Basket Retention and Removal on Whole Tree Stability and Long-term Growth1

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
R. Hauer, Andrew K. Koeser, Jason W. Miesbauer, Jeff Edgar, David Kleinhuizen
{"title":"Impacts of Wire Basket Retention and Removal on Whole Tree Stability and Long-term Growth1","authors":"R. Hauer, Andrew K. Koeser, Jason W. Miesbauer, Jeff Edgar, David Kleinhuizen","doi":"10.24266/0738-2898-39.1.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n When balled-and-burlapped trees are planted, a decision must be made regarding whether the wire basket, burlap, and other packing materials should be removed (completely or partially) or retained. While past research has failed to show a significant impact of either approach with regard to initial growth and establishment, many professionals still question whether a decision to leave the wire basket intact at planting will have longer-term impacts to tree health and stability. In this study, we revisit two nursery trials first initiated in 2011 and 2012 to assess the impact of burlap folding, and full wire basket removal, partial removal, or retention on tree growth and root anchorage five to six growing years after planting. We found that neither stem caliper (min P = 0.249) nor twig elongation (min P = 0.297) differed among removal treatments with the Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) and ‘Skycole' honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L. var. inermis) trees used in this study. Similarly, we were unable to detect any differences in rooting strength among the removal treatments tested (min P = 0.154). These results serve as further evidence that wire baskets are not a cause of early tree mortality or instability.\n Index words: Arboriculture, biomechanics, growth and longevity, nursery production, static-pull test, transplanting, transplant shock.\n Species used in this study: Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.); ‘Skycole' honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L. var. inermis).","PeriodicalId":15780,"journal":{"name":"Journal of environmental horticulture","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of environmental horticulture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24266/0738-2898-39.1.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When balled-and-burlapped trees are planted, a decision must be made regarding whether the wire basket, burlap, and other packing materials should be removed (completely or partially) or retained. While past research has failed to show a significant impact of either approach with regard to initial growth and establishment, many professionals still question whether a decision to leave the wire basket intact at planting will have longer-term impacts to tree health and stability. In this study, we revisit two nursery trials first initiated in 2011 and 2012 to assess the impact of burlap folding, and full wire basket removal, partial removal, or retention on tree growth and root anchorage five to six growing years after planting. We found that neither stem caliper (min P = 0.249) nor twig elongation (min P = 0.297) differed among removal treatments with the Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) and ‘Skycole' honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L. var. inermis) trees used in this study. Similarly, we were unable to detect any differences in rooting strength among the removal treatments tested (min P = 0.154). These results serve as further evidence that wire baskets are not a cause of early tree mortality or instability. Index words: Arboriculture, biomechanics, growth and longevity, nursery production, static-pull test, transplanting, transplant shock. Species used in this study: Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.); ‘Skycole' honeylocust (Gleditsia triacanthos L. var. inermis).
保留和移除铁丝网对整棵树稳定性和长期生长的影响1
当种植成球和粗麻布的树木时,必须决定是否应该(全部或部分)移除钢丝篮、粗麻布和其他包装材料或保留。虽然过去的研究未能显示任何一种方法对初始生长和建立的重大影响,但许多专业人士仍然质疑,在种植时保留铁丝篮的决定是否会对树木的健康和稳定产生长期影响。在本研究中,我们重新回顾了2011年和2012年首次启动的两项苗圃试验,以评估麻袋折叠、全钢丝筐去除、部分去除或保留对种植后5至6年树木生长和根系锚定的影响。研究发现,挪威枫(Acer platanoides L.)和天井刺槐(Gleditsia triacanthos L. var. inermis)的茎径(min P = 0.249)和枝条伸长(min P = 0.297)在去除处理中均无差异。同样,我们也没有发现不同处理间生根强度的差异(最小P = 0.154)。这些结果进一步证明,铁丝篮不是导致树木早期死亡或不稳定的原因。关键词:树木栽培,生物力学,生长与寿命,苗圃生产,静拉试验,移栽,移栽震动。本研究利用的树种:挪威枫(Acer platanoides L.);' Skycole'蜜蝗(Gleditsia triacanthos L. var. inermis)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of environmental horticulture
Journal of environmental horticulture Environmental Science-Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信