Different factors control organic matter degradation in bulk and rhizosphere soil from the top- and subsoils of three forest stands

IF 12.2 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE
Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2022-09-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-13 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108775
Michael Herre, Stefanie Heinze, Julian Heitkötter, Bernd Marschner
{"title":"Different factors control organic matter degradation in bulk and rhizosphere soil from the top- and subsoils of three forest stands","authors":"Michael Herre,&nbsp;Stefanie Heinze,&nbsp;Julian Heitkötter,&nbsp;Bernd Marschner","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2022.108775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The input of substrates and nutrients into deeper soil layers is limited to small regions of the bulk soil through living roots and preferential flow<span> paths which can stimulate a more abundant and diverse microbial community. The aim of this study was to elucidate if </span></span>SOC<span> mineralization<span><span> in bulk and rhizosphere<span> soil is differentially limited by nutrients and substrates and to what extent this is site-specific. An 82-day incubation study was conducted with bulk and rhizosphere soil samples from the topsoil (0–10 cm) and </span></span>subsoil (30–50 cm) from three beech forest sites (</span></span></span><span><em>Fagus sylvatica</em></span><span><span> L.) in northern Germany. All sites are within the same climatic region and share the same land use history and a similar old tree population but differ in parent material (Pleistocene sand = PS, Triassic sandstone = TS and Loess = LS). To identify the response of the </span>microbial activity to changing nutritional conditions, </span><sup>14</sup><span>C-substrate and SOC mineralization, microbial activity, enzyme activities<span><span><span> from the C-, N-, and P-cycle, dehydrogenase and </span>peroxidase<span> activity were determined after substrate- and nutrient-additions. We found high amounts of labile C in the subsoil at the LS and PS sites and a generally higher SOC and faster substrate mineralization in the rhizosphere samples compared to the respective bulk soil in both, the topsoil (29–296%) and subsoil (73–563%) compared to the respective bulk soil. The addition of glucose caused positive priming effect only in samples from one site (TS), while effects were negative (PS) or not significant (LS) at the other sites. While glucose mineralization was similar in all samples, reaching 50–65% after 82 days, the mineralization of palmitic acid showed a differential pattern across the three sampling sites. In samples from two sites (PS, LS), the mineralization of palmitic acid was delayed by 10–30 days and had no effects on SOC turnover, while it showed no lag phase at the TS site and additionally stimulated SOC turnover. N additions generally and in some cases also P additions decreased SOC mineralization compared to the control samples. The results therefore show that labile and more complex substrates induce SOC mineralization differently between the investigated sample sites, with further differentiation with depth, sampling type and soil type, indicating that </span></span>microorganisms in bulk and rhizosphere soil undergoes different adaptation processes based on their unique community composition.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"172 ","pages":"Article 108775"},"PeriodicalIF":12.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038071722002322","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The input of substrates and nutrients into deeper soil layers is limited to small regions of the bulk soil through living roots and preferential flow paths which can stimulate a more abundant and diverse microbial community. The aim of this study was to elucidate if SOC mineralization in bulk and rhizosphere soil is differentially limited by nutrients and substrates and to what extent this is site-specific. An 82-day incubation study was conducted with bulk and rhizosphere soil samples from the topsoil (0–10 cm) and subsoil (30–50 cm) from three beech forest sites (Fagus sylvatica L.) in northern Germany. All sites are within the same climatic region and share the same land use history and a similar old tree population but differ in parent material (Pleistocene sand = PS, Triassic sandstone = TS and Loess = LS). To identify the response of the microbial activity to changing nutritional conditions, 14C-substrate and SOC mineralization, microbial activity, enzyme activities from the C-, N-, and P-cycle, dehydrogenase and peroxidase activity were determined after substrate- and nutrient-additions. We found high amounts of labile C in the subsoil at the LS and PS sites and a generally higher SOC and faster substrate mineralization in the rhizosphere samples compared to the respective bulk soil in both, the topsoil (29–296%) and subsoil (73–563%) compared to the respective bulk soil. The addition of glucose caused positive priming effect only in samples from one site (TS), while effects were negative (PS) or not significant (LS) at the other sites. While glucose mineralization was similar in all samples, reaching 50–65% after 82 days, the mineralization of palmitic acid showed a differential pattern across the three sampling sites. In samples from two sites (PS, LS), the mineralization of palmitic acid was delayed by 10–30 days and had no effects on SOC turnover, while it showed no lag phase at the TS site and additionally stimulated SOC turnover. N additions generally and in some cases also P additions decreased SOC mineralization compared to the control samples. The results therefore show that labile and more complex substrates induce SOC mineralization differently between the investigated sample sites, with further differentiation with depth, sampling type and soil type, indicating that microorganisms in bulk and rhizosphere soil undergoes different adaptation processes based on their unique community composition.

不同的因素控制着三种林分表层和底土的根际土壤和块状土壤有机质的降解
基质和营养物质通过活根和优先流动路径进入较深土层,限制在大块土壤的小区域内,这可以刺激更丰富和多样化的微生物群落。本研究的目的是阐明大块土壤和根际土壤的有机碳矿化是否受到养分和基质的不同限制,以及这在多大程度上是地点特异性的。对德国北部三个山毛榉林(Fagus sylvatica L.)的表层土壤(0-10 cm)和底土(30-50 cm)的大块土壤和根际土壤样品进行了82天的培养研究。所有遗址都处于相同的气候区域,具有相同的土地利用历史和相似的古树种群,但母质不同(更新世砂= PS,三叠纪砂岩= TS和黄土= LS)。为了确定微生物活性对营养条件变化的响应,在添加底物和营养物后,测定了14c -底物和有机碳矿化、微生物活性、C-、N-和p -循环酶活性、脱氢酶和过氧化物酶活性。我们发现,与大块土相比,LS和PS站点的底土中含有大量的活性碳,根际样品的有机碳含量普遍更高,基质矿化速度更快,表层土(29-296%)和底土(73-563%)与大块土相比。葡萄糖的加入仅在一个位点(TS)的样品中产生正启动效应,而在其他位点的样品中产生负启动效应(PS)或不显著启动效应(LS)。虽然葡萄糖矿化在所有样品中相似,在82天后达到50-65%,但棕榈酸的矿化在三个采样点表现出不同的模式。在两个位点(PS, LS)的样品中,棕榈酸的矿化延迟了10-30天,对有机碳的转化没有影响,而在TS位点没有迟滞期,反而刺激了有机碳的转化。与对照样品相比,添加氮总体上(在某些情况下也添加磷)降低了有机碳矿化。综上所述,在不同的样点,不同的土壤基质对土壤有机碳矿化的诱导作用不同,且随土壤深度、取样类型和土壤类型的不同而进一步分化,这表明根际土壤和块状土壤中的微生物因其独特的群落组成而经历了不同的适应过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书