Multi-Modal 2020

IF 0.9 3区哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY

Informal Logic Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.22329/il.v42i3.7497

Michael A. Gilbert

引用次数: 0

Abstract

My essay, “Multi-modal argumentation” was published in the journal, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, in 1994. This information appeared again in my book, Coalescent argumentation in 1997. In the ensuing twenty years, there have been many changes in argumentation theory, and I would like to take this opportunity to examine my now middle-aged theory in light of the developments in our discipline. I will begin by relating how a once keen intended lawyer and then formal logician ended up in argumentation theory. (If you do not care to read this bit of autobiography, skip to Section 2).

查看原文本刊更多论文

Multi Modal 2020

我的论文“多模态论证”于1994年发表在《社会科学哲学》杂志上。这一信息再次出现在我1997年出版的《聚合论证》一书中。在随后的二十年里，论证理论发生了许多变化，我想借此机会，结合我们学科的发展，来审视我现在已经中年的理论。我将首先讲述一位曾经热衷于律师，后来成为正式逻辑学家的人是如何进入论证理论的。（如果你不想读这本自传，请跳到第2节）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Informal Logic PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： Informal Logic publishes articles that advance the dialectic in reasoning and argumentation theory and practice. Primary criteria for the acceptance of articles with a theoretical focus or interest are: (1) the article advances the dialectic or constitutes an interesting comment on it: it presents a cogent argument, objection, interpretation or position that is an advance in relation to the background of issues and controversies on the topic; or it casts the issue addressed in a new and worthwhile light; and (2) the article makes explicit reference to the pertinent literature on its topic, and it discharges the burden of proof imposed by that scholarship. Primary criteria for acceptance of articles devoted to the teaching of informal logic, critical thinking or argumentation include: originality; utility; timeliness; and evidence of the effectiveness of the methods, materials, technologies, etc., proposed. The standard criteria for scholarly publication—topical fit with the subjects covered in the journal; adequacy of coverage to the issue addressed; clarity, organization and literateness of the prose; conceptual clarity and cogency of argumentation—apply ceteris paribus to the selection of all articles, notes and reviews.