Introduction: critiquing the onto-epistemic coloniality of modernity in/beyond education

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Weili Zhao, T. Popkewitz
{"title":"Introduction: critiquing the onto-epistemic coloniality of modernity in/beyond education","authors":"Weili Zhao, T. Popkewitz","doi":"10.1080/01596306.2022.2041327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When we proposed to do this special issue for Discourse almost three years ago, our intention was to historicize the happenings of epistemic colonialism in transnational/cultural knowledge translation and transfer. During the working process, we found that the seven pieces pushed us further with nuances that form along three lines. First, the notion of colonialism needs to be differentiated from coloniality. As proposed by Quijano (2000) and reiterated through Andreotti (2021),","PeriodicalId":47908,"journal":{"name":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","volume":"43 1","pages":"335 - 346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discourse-Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2022.2041327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

When we proposed to do this special issue for Discourse almost three years ago, our intention was to historicize the happenings of epistemic colonialism in transnational/cultural knowledge translation and transfer. During the working process, we found that the seven pieces pushed us further with nuances that form along three lines. First, the notion of colonialism needs to be differentiated from coloniality. As proposed by Quijano (2000) and reiterated through Andreotti (2021),
引言:批判教育内外现代性的非认识殖民主义
近三年前,当我们提出为《话语》做这一特刊时,我们的意图是将认识殖民主义在跨国/文化知识翻译和转移中发生的事情历史化。在工作过程中,我们发现这七件作品以三条线的细微差别进一步推动了我们。首先,殖民主义的概念需要与殖民主义区分开来。正如Quijano(2000)提出并通过Andreotti(2021)重申的那样,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Discourse is an international, fully peer-reviewed journal publishing contemporary research and theorising in the cultural politics of education. The journal publishes academic articles from throughout the world which contribute to contemporary debates on the new social, cultural and political configurations that now mark education as a highly contested but important cultural site. Discourse adopts a broadly critical orientation, but is not tied to any particular ideological, disciplinary or methodological position. It encourages interdisciplinary approaches to the analysis of educational theory, policy and practice. It welcomes papers which explore speculative ideas in education, are written in innovative ways, or are presented in experimental ways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信