Deux cadres méthodo-épistémologiques du testing structurant la construction et l’adaptation de tests, références incontournables mais, hélas, largement ignorées. Illustration à partir de cinq revues françaises de psychologie

IF 0.6 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY
N.E Boudouda , G. Broc , N. Calcagni , S. Ben Youssef , K. Gana
{"title":"Deux cadres méthodo-épistémologiques du testing structurant la construction et l’adaptation de tests, références incontournables mais, hélas, largement ignorées. Illustration à partir de cinq revues françaises de psychologie","authors":"N.E Boudouda ,&nbsp;G. Broc ,&nbsp;N. Calcagni ,&nbsp;S. Ben Youssef ,&nbsp;K. Gana","doi":"10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this article is to present two current methodo-epistemological frameworks for test and testing procedures, namely the Standards for Education and Psychological Testing (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014), and the ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2017). These two frameworks were designed to serve as “universal” references shaping the construction and adaptation of psychological tests and scales. However, a review of articles published in five French journals shows that these two frameworks are largely ignored. Their dissemination could improve good practices in construction and cross-cultural adaptation of psychological tests and scales.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54590,"journal":{"name":"Pratiques Psychologiques","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 209-221"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.prps.2021.01.001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pratiques Psychologiques","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1269176321000183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to present two current methodo-epistemological frameworks for test and testing procedures, namely the Standards for Education and Psychological Testing (AERA, APA, NCME, 2014), and the ITC Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests (2017). These two frameworks were designed to serve as “universal” references shaping the construction and adaptation of psychological tests and scales. However, a review of articles published in five French journals shows that these two frameworks are largely ignored. Their dissemination could improve good practices in construction and cross-cultural adaptation of psychological tests and scales.

两个测试的方法论-认识论框架,构建和调整测试,不可避免的参考,但不幸的是,很大程度上被忽视了。插图来自五家法国心理学杂志
本文的目的是介绍目前两种测试和测试程序的方法-认识论框架,即教育和心理测试标准(AERA, APA, NCME, 2014)和ITC翻译和改编测试指南(2017)。这两个框架旨在作为“通用”参考,塑造心理测试和量表的构建和适应。然而,对五家法国期刊上发表的文章的回顾表明,这两个框架在很大程度上被忽视了。它们的传播可以改进心理测试和量表在构建和跨文化适应方面的良好做法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
81 days
期刊介绍: Pratiques psychologiques is an official publication of the ''Société française de psychologie''. It publishes thematic issues, and concentrates on the applications in the psychological practice. It covers all fields of psychology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信