De mujeres, montañas y desiertos: espacios regionales en Montaña adentro y O Quinze

IF 0.1 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE, ROMANCE
Rebeca Errázuriz
{"title":"De mujeres, montañas y desiertos: espacios regionales en Montaña adentro y O Quinze","authors":"Rebeca Errázuriz","doi":"10.1353/hir.2022.0037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract (Lang: Spanish):Este artículo propone un análisis comparado de las novelas Montaña adentro, de Marta Brunet, y O Quinze, de Rachel de Queiroz, con énfasis en la presentación de una naturaleza difícil y de territorios excéntricos y rurales, vinculados a los personajes femeninos que protagonizan ambas obras. Si la novela de Brunet opera un recorte y se concentra en los personajes del mundo popular, elidiendo el mundo de los patrones, Queiroz opera un descentramiento a través del personaje de Conceição, cuyas opciones vitales tensionan y desnaturalizan el orden patriarcal de la fazenda nordestina. En ambas novelas se produce un juego de desvíos y tensiones a lo largo de dos ejes articuladores: la representación de la tierra y el lugar de la mujer.Abstract (Lang: English):This article proposes a comparative analysis of the novels Montaña adentro, by Marta Brunet, and O Quinze, by Rachel de Queiroz, with emphasis on the presentation of a difficult nature and eccentric and rural territories, linked to the main female characters. Brunet's novel is reductionist in the sense that it concentrates on characters of the working-class world, avoiding the world of landowners. In contrast, Queiroz operates a decentering through the character of Conceição, whose life options stress and distort the patriarchal order of the northeastern fazenda. In both novels there is a game of detours and tensions along two articulating axes: the representation of the land and the place of women.","PeriodicalId":44625,"journal":{"name":"HISPANIC REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HISPANIC REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hir.2022.0037","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, ROMANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract (Lang: Spanish):Este artículo propone un análisis comparado de las novelas Montaña adentro, de Marta Brunet, y O Quinze, de Rachel de Queiroz, con énfasis en la presentación de una naturaleza difícil y de territorios excéntricos y rurales, vinculados a los personajes femeninos que protagonizan ambas obras. Si la novela de Brunet opera un recorte y se concentra en los personajes del mundo popular, elidiendo el mundo de los patrones, Queiroz opera un descentramiento a través del personaje de Conceição, cuyas opciones vitales tensionan y desnaturalizan el orden patriarcal de la fazenda nordestina. En ambas novelas se produce un juego de desvíos y tensiones a lo largo de dos ejes articuladores: la representación de la tierra y el lugar de la mujer.Abstract (Lang: English):This article proposes a comparative analysis of the novels Montaña adentro, by Marta Brunet, and O Quinze, by Rachel de Queiroz, with emphasis on the presentation of a difficult nature and eccentric and rural territories, linked to the main female characters. Brunet's novel is reductionist in the sense that it concentrates on characters of the working-class world, avoiding the world of landowners. In contrast, Queiroz operates a decentering through the character of Conceição, whose life options stress and distort the patriarchal order of the northeastern fazenda. In both novels there is a game of detours and tensions along two articulating axes: the representation of the land and the place of women.
妇女、山区和沙漠:内陆山区的区域空间和O 15
摘要(Lang:Spanish):本文对玛尔塔·布鲁内特(Marta Brunet)和雷切尔·德·奎罗斯(Rachel de Queiroz)的小说《山里面》(Mountain Indero)进行了比较分析,重点介绍了与这两部作品中的女性角色有关的艰难自然以及古怪和农村的领土。如果布鲁内特的小说进行了剪裁,专注于流行世界的人物,从模式中选择世界,奎罗斯则通过康塞索的角色进行权力下放,康塞索的重要选择会紧张和扭曲北法曾达的父权制秩序。在这两部小说中,都沿着两个铰接的轴心发生了一场曲折和紧张的游戏:对土地和妇女地位的描绘。摘要(Lang:English):这篇文章对玛尔塔·布鲁内特(Marta Brunet)和雷切尔·德·奎罗斯(Rachel de Queiroz)的小说《内心的山》进行了比较分析,重点介绍了与主要女性角色有关的困难性质、偏心和农村领土。布鲁内特的小说是还原论的,因为它专注于工人阶级世界的人物,避免了地主的世界。相比之下,奎罗斯通过康塞索的角色进行了一场令人失望的表演,康塞索的生活选择强调并扭曲了法曾达东北部的父权秩序。在这两部小说中,都有一场围绕两条铰接轴的纠葛和紧张的游戏:土地的代表性和妇女的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
HISPANIC REVIEW
HISPANIC REVIEW LITERATURE, ROMANCE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: A quarterly journal devoted to research in Hispanic and Luso-Brazilian literatures and cultures, Hispanic Review has been edited since 1933 by the Department of Romance Languages at the University of Pennsylvania. The journal features essays and book reviews on the diverse cultural manifestations of Iberia and Latin America, from the medieval period to the present.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信