Separation events in Mandarin, Russian and Korean

IF 0.6 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Jing Du, F. Li, Yanlei Ge, Jinkai Zhang
{"title":"Separation events in Mandarin, Russian and Korean","authors":"Jing Du, F. Li, Yanlei Ge, Jinkai Zhang","doi":"10.1075/rcl.00143.du","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Crosslinguistic studies on motion events have revealed that S-languages demonstrate finer-grained lexical\n categories than V-languages in representing motion manners/gaits. But these studies were restricted to the semantic domain of\n motion events and confined to a limited number of S- or V- languages. In this paper, we further investigate whether the\n association between lexical diversity and language typology is manifest in a similar way in the semantic domain of separation\n events by focusing on Mandarin, Russian and Korean. Our results suggest that: (1) Separation expressions support the\n diversity-typology correlation proved in motion expressions because the two S-languages Mandarin and Russian demonstrate richer\n lexical diversity than the V-language Korean; (2) It is further pointed out that apart from language typology, lexical diversity\n is influenced by multiple factors including lexical resources, conceptual salience, event construal, and event type; (3) Though\n typologically different, these three languages, in their lexical naming of separation events, are constrained by the biomechanical\n structure and follow the principle of prototypicality. Overall, this study opens up a new crosslinguistic perspective by showing\n how lexical diversity is typologically and linguistically driven.","PeriodicalId":51932,"journal":{"name":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00143.du","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crosslinguistic studies on motion events have revealed that S-languages demonstrate finer-grained lexical categories than V-languages in representing motion manners/gaits. But these studies were restricted to the semantic domain of motion events and confined to a limited number of S- or V- languages. In this paper, we further investigate whether the association between lexical diversity and language typology is manifest in a similar way in the semantic domain of separation events by focusing on Mandarin, Russian and Korean. Our results suggest that: (1) Separation expressions support the diversity-typology correlation proved in motion expressions because the two S-languages Mandarin and Russian demonstrate richer lexical diversity than the V-language Korean; (2) It is further pointed out that apart from language typology, lexical diversity is influenced by multiple factors including lexical resources, conceptual salience, event construal, and event type; (3) Though typologically different, these three languages, in their lexical naming of separation events, are constrained by the biomechanical structure and follow the principle of prototypicality. Overall, this study opens up a new crosslinguistic perspective by showing how lexical diversity is typologically and linguistically driven.
普通话、俄语和韩语的分离活动
对动作事件的跨语言研究表明,S语言在表现动作方式/步态方面表现出比V语言更细粒度的词汇类别。但这些研究仅限于运动事件的语义领域,并且仅限于有限数量的S或V语言。在本文中,我们通过关注普通话、俄语和韩语,进一步研究了词汇多样性与语言类型学之间的联系在分离事件的语义域中是否以类似的方式表现出来。我们的研究结果表明:(1)分离表达支持运动表达中证明的多样性-类型相关性,因为汉语和俄语这两种S语言比韩语表现出更丰富的词汇多样性;(2) 进一步指出,除了语言类型学之外,词汇多样性还受到多种因素的影响,包括词汇资源、概念显著性、事件构念和事件类型;(3) 这三种语言虽然在类型上不同,但在对分离事件进行词汇命名时,都受到生物力学结构的制约,遵循原型性原则。总的来说,本研究通过展示词汇多样性是如何在类型学和语言学上驱动的,开辟了一个新的跨语言视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信