Clinical profile of patients of ASD device closure with special reference to short and intermediate term complications

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pramesh Gaidhane, J. Prajapati, I. Patel, Bhagyashri Bhutada, C. Yadav, K. Yadav, B. Panakkal
{"title":"Clinical profile of patients of ASD device closure with special reference to short and intermediate term complications","authors":"Pramesh Gaidhane, J. Prajapati, I. Patel, Bhagyashri Bhutada, C. Yadav, K. Yadav, B. Panakkal","doi":"10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_30_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Device closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is a treatment of choice in selected patients with a suitable defect. We aimed to evaluate short- and intermediate-term outcomes with device closure in special reference to complications in Western Indian population. Materials and Methods: The present prospective observational study enrolled 184 patients with ASD who underwent Device closure. All patients were followed at 15–30 days (short) and 3–12 months (intermediate). Results: Device closure of ASD was done successfully in 180 (97.83%) patients. Systolic (P = 0.02), diastolic (P = 0.007), and mean PA (P = 0.0001) pressure were significantly decreased at postprocedure. Residual defect was resolved in 94.2% of patients by 6 months. Preprocedural Pulmonary artery hypertension was found in 36 (19.56%) patients and was reduced in 15 (8.15%) patients postprocedure and in 10 (5.43%) patients at 1 year. Residual shunt was reported in 34% of patients which was resolved in all by 6 months. At postprocedure and follow–up, patients were developed minor complications included (0.5%) moderate MR, 1 (0.5%) lower respiratory tract infection, and 3 (1.6%) local site hematoma. Eleven (5.98%) major complications involved arrythmia (2.17%), infective endocarditis (0.54%), LAA perforation (0.54%), cardioembolic shock (0.54%), device embolization (0.54%), sudden cardiac arrest (0.54%), intraprocedural acute coronary syndrome (0.54%), and cardiac tamponade (0.54%). Conclusion: Device closure appears to be best available option at the present time. Careful attention to the details of the technique is mandatory to achieve a successful outcome in order to avoid complication related to procedure. Patients of all ages experience reduction in pulmonary artery pressure after percutaneous device closure of ASD.","PeriodicalId":17503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences","volume":"7 1","pages":"212 - 218"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpcs.jpcs_30_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Device closure of atrial septal defect (ASD) is a treatment of choice in selected patients with a suitable defect. We aimed to evaluate short- and intermediate-term outcomes with device closure in special reference to complications in Western Indian population. Materials and Methods: The present prospective observational study enrolled 184 patients with ASD who underwent Device closure. All patients were followed at 15–30 days (short) and 3–12 months (intermediate). Results: Device closure of ASD was done successfully in 180 (97.83%) patients. Systolic (P = 0.02), diastolic (P = 0.007), and mean PA (P = 0.0001) pressure were significantly decreased at postprocedure. Residual defect was resolved in 94.2% of patients by 6 months. Preprocedural Pulmonary artery hypertension was found in 36 (19.56%) patients and was reduced in 15 (8.15%) patients postprocedure and in 10 (5.43%) patients at 1 year. Residual shunt was reported in 34% of patients which was resolved in all by 6 months. At postprocedure and follow–up, patients were developed minor complications included (0.5%) moderate MR, 1 (0.5%) lower respiratory tract infection, and 3 (1.6%) local site hematoma. Eleven (5.98%) major complications involved arrythmia (2.17%), infective endocarditis (0.54%), LAA perforation (0.54%), cardioembolic shock (0.54%), device embolization (0.54%), sudden cardiac arrest (0.54%), intraprocedural acute coronary syndrome (0.54%), and cardiac tamponade (0.54%). Conclusion: Device closure appears to be best available option at the present time. Careful attention to the details of the technique is mandatory to achieve a successful outcome in order to avoid complication related to procedure. Patients of all ages experience reduction in pulmonary artery pressure after percutaneous device closure of ASD.
ASD封堵器患者的临床特点及中短期并发症
背景:心房间隔缺损(ASD)封堵器是选择合适缺损患者的一种治疗方法。我们的目的是评估装置闭合的短期和中期结果,特别是针对西印度人群的并发症。材料和方法:本前瞻性观察性研究纳入了184名接受封堵器治疗的ASD患者。所有患者均在15-30天(短期)和3-12个月(中期)接受随访。结果:180例(97.83%)ASD患者成功完成了封堵器。术后收缩压(P=0.02)、舒张压(P=0.007)和平均PA压(P=0.001)显著降低。94.2%的患者在6个月内修复了残余缺损。术前肺动脉高压在36例(19.56%)患者中发现,术后15例(8.15%)患者和1年时10例(5.43%)患者的肺动脉高压降低。据报道,34%的患者出现残余分流,6个月后全部缓解。在术后和随访中,患者出现轻微并发症,包括(0.5%)中度MR、1例(0.5%)下呼吸道感染和3例(1.6%)局部血肿。11例(5.98%)主要并发症包括心律失常(2.17%)、感染性心内膜炎(0.54%)、左心耳穿孔(0.54%)、心脏栓塞性休克(0.54%1)、装置栓塞(0.54%2)、心脏骤停(0.54%3)、术中急性冠状动脉综合征(0.54%4)和心脏填塞(0.54%5)。为了避免与手术相关的并发症,必须仔细注意技术细节才能取得成功。所有年龄段的患者在ASD经皮封堵器后肺动脉压均降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences
Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信