{"title":"How children’s intellectual profiles relate to their cognitive, socio-emotional, and academic functioning","authors":"J. Gubbels, E. Segers, L. Verhoeven","doi":"10.1080/13598139.2018.1507902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Intellectual abilities are consistently found to be associated to child functioning. To date, however, it is unclear how varying intellectual profiles relate to differential aspects of child functioning. We screened 513 fifth-grade children on their intellectual abilities and selected three groups of gifted children, scoring in the top 10%: analytically gifted (n = 14), creatively gifted (n = 18), and analytically creatively gifted (n = 13). Of the remaining typically developing children, a group of 152 children was selected. We examined how these groups differed in cognitive, socio-em otional, and academic aspects of child functioning. A comparison of the gifted group as a whole versus the typically developing group, showed higher scores for the gifted group on cognitive functioning, self-concept, and academic functioning. Fine-grained group comparisons showed especially the analytical-creative subgroup to score higher than the typically developing group on visual and verbal short term memory (STM), motivation, and self-concept. Furthermore, both creatively gifted subgroups outperformed the typically developing group regarding vocabulary, while all three gifted subgroups outperformed the typically developing group regarding arithmetic. A combination of high analytical and creative abilities, which was found in 2.5% of the sample, thus seemed to lead to enhanced functioning in all three domains (i.e. cognitive, socio-emotional, and academic). Abbrevation: STM = Short term memory HSD = Honestly Significance Difference","PeriodicalId":46343,"journal":{"name":"High Ability Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"149 - 168"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/13598139.2018.1507902","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"High Ability Studies","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13598139.2018.1507902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
Abstract
ABSTRACT Intellectual abilities are consistently found to be associated to child functioning. To date, however, it is unclear how varying intellectual profiles relate to differential aspects of child functioning. We screened 513 fifth-grade children on their intellectual abilities and selected three groups of gifted children, scoring in the top 10%: analytically gifted (n = 14), creatively gifted (n = 18), and analytically creatively gifted (n = 13). Of the remaining typically developing children, a group of 152 children was selected. We examined how these groups differed in cognitive, socio-em otional, and academic aspects of child functioning. A comparison of the gifted group as a whole versus the typically developing group, showed higher scores for the gifted group on cognitive functioning, self-concept, and academic functioning. Fine-grained group comparisons showed especially the analytical-creative subgroup to score higher than the typically developing group on visual and verbal short term memory (STM), motivation, and self-concept. Furthermore, both creatively gifted subgroups outperformed the typically developing group regarding vocabulary, while all three gifted subgroups outperformed the typically developing group regarding arithmetic. A combination of high analytical and creative abilities, which was found in 2.5% of the sample, thus seemed to lead to enhanced functioning in all three domains (i.e. cognitive, socio-emotional, and academic). Abbrevation: STM = Short term memory HSD = Honestly Significance Difference
期刊介绍:
High Ability Studies provides a forum for scholars in a variety of disciplines associated with the development of human abilities to their highest level. It is a medium for the promotion of high ability, whether through the communication of scientific research, theory, or the exchange of practical experience and ideas. The contents of this journal are unique in reflecting concerns and recent developments in this area from childhood and across the whole life span in a variety of contexts. Far from being restricted to the traditional focus on high-level cognitive development, it also presents investigations into all other areas of human endeavour, including sport, technology, the arts, business, management and social relations.