In defence of Smysl and its logic

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Lora Ryskeldiyeva
{"title":"In defence of Smysl and its logic","authors":"Lora Ryskeldiyeva","doi":"10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-4-26-34","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Being a supporter of the “Logic of Smysl” approach (LS), the author is highlighting four its main aspects in assurance that they can increase the number of such supporters. First, it responds to the searches being carried out in European culture and to serious and multi­faceted criticism of academic philosophy. So, it has the potential to overcome this crisis on the path to discovering Smysl as a real “thing” (res), as well as to overcome the notori­ous and bored dichotomy of analytical and hermeneutic approaches. Secondly, the philos­ophy proceeding from the LS starts from the very beginnings of thinking, from the meta­physical idea of ​​Wholeness-Smysl, comes to socio-political implications, thus following the Russian traditions of integral, whole knowledge. Thirdly, LS, preserving the problem of consciousness as a problem, fundamental and peculiar to modernity, can become a complex of new researches, leading cognitive science to the study of other ways of thinking of the world. Fourthly, the author sees in LS an ethical project: as a goal it is reviving and re-interpreting the well-known Russian philosophy ideal of all-humanity, taking into account the real otherness of the Other and using the material of philosophical Oriental studies – it is the ideal of friendship and brotherhood.","PeriodicalId":41795,"journal":{"name":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21146/2072-0726-2022-15-4-26-34","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Being a supporter of the “Logic of Smysl” approach (LS), the author is highlighting four its main aspects in assurance that they can increase the number of such supporters. First, it responds to the searches being carried out in European culture and to serious and multi­faceted criticism of academic philosophy. So, it has the potential to overcome this crisis on the path to discovering Smysl as a real “thing” (res), as well as to overcome the notori­ous and bored dichotomy of analytical and hermeneutic approaches. Secondly, the philos­ophy proceeding from the LS starts from the very beginnings of thinking, from the meta­physical idea of ​​Wholeness-Smysl, comes to socio-political implications, thus following the Russian traditions of integral, whole knowledge. Thirdly, LS, preserving the problem of consciousness as a problem, fundamental and peculiar to modernity, can become a complex of new researches, leading cognitive science to the study of other ways of thinking of the world. Fourthly, the author sees in LS an ethical project: as a goal it is reviving and re-interpreting the well-known Russian philosophy ideal of all-humanity, taking into account the real otherness of the Other and using the material of philosophical Oriental studies – it is the ideal of friendship and brotherhood.
为Smysl及其逻辑辩护
作为“Smysl逻辑”方法(LS)的支持者,作者强调了它的四个主要方面,以确保他们可以增加这样的支持者的数量。首先,它回应了在欧洲文化中进行的探索,以及对学术哲学的严肃和多方面的批评。因此,它有潜力在发现Smysl作为一个真实的“东西”的道路上克服这个危机,以及克服分析和解释学方法的臭名昭着和无聊的二分法。其次,从LS出发的哲学从思考的起点出发,从整体- smysl的元物理观念出发,到达社会-政治含义,从而遵循俄罗斯的整体,整体知识传统。第三,认知科学保留了意识问题作为现代性的一个基本和特有的问题,可以成为一个新的研究综合体,将认知科学引向对世界其他思维方式的研究。第四,作者在《他者论》中看到了一个伦理工程:它的目标是复兴和重新诠释俄罗斯著名的全人类哲学理想,考虑到他者的真正他者性,并利用东方哲学研究的材料——友谊和兄弟情谊的理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Filosofskii Zhurnal
Filosofskii Zhurnal PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信