Two Modes of the Avant-Garde’s Disintegration in Twenty-First-Century Serbian Music

IF 0.3 2区 艺术学 0 MUSIC
Mirjana Veselinović-Hofman
{"title":"Two Modes of the Avant-Garde’s Disintegration in Twenty-First-Century Serbian Music","authors":"Mirjana Veselinović-Hofman","doi":"10.1080/07494467.2021.2022893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To discuss Serbian twenty-first-century avant-garde music means to address two key phenomena: (1) the avant-garde’s position in postmodernism, which—established in its form in the mid-1970s—has persisted over the past two decades of the twenty-first century; and (2) a modification of that position, which has concurrently manifested itself in Serbian music since the late 1980s. The first phenomenon refers to the condition of treating the avant-garde in postmodernism, like any other style from the musical past, as devoid of its internal hierarchy and authentic being. More precisely, it has been treated as a ‘collection’ of artefacts, i.e. constitutive components, into which the avant-garde has been ‘disassembled’ or ‘dismantled’. The second phenomenon concerns a certain tendency to transcend that de-hierarchising impulse precisely by using postmodernist tools. Namely, it concerns the postmodernist ‘validation’ of indicators associated with various creative tendencies from the past, among them also some modernist concepts, including those that once qualified as avant-garde. In other words, in neither of those two instances does the avant-garde in Serbian twenty-first-century music exist the way it did before the advent of postmodernism, but instead becomes part of a phenomenon that I regard as postmodernist modernism.","PeriodicalId":44746,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Music Review","volume":"40 1","pages":"650 - 663"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Music Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2021.2022893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To discuss Serbian twenty-first-century avant-garde music means to address two key phenomena: (1) the avant-garde’s position in postmodernism, which—established in its form in the mid-1970s—has persisted over the past two decades of the twenty-first century; and (2) a modification of that position, which has concurrently manifested itself in Serbian music since the late 1980s. The first phenomenon refers to the condition of treating the avant-garde in postmodernism, like any other style from the musical past, as devoid of its internal hierarchy and authentic being. More precisely, it has been treated as a ‘collection’ of artefacts, i.e. constitutive components, into which the avant-garde has been ‘disassembled’ or ‘dismantled’. The second phenomenon concerns a certain tendency to transcend that de-hierarchising impulse precisely by using postmodernist tools. Namely, it concerns the postmodernist ‘validation’ of indicators associated with various creative tendencies from the past, among them also some modernist concepts, including those that once qualified as avant-garde. In other words, in neither of those two instances does the avant-garde in Serbian twenty-first-century music exist the way it did before the advent of postmodernism, but instead becomes part of a phenomenon that I regard as postmodernist modernism.
21世纪塞尔维亚音乐中先锋派瓦解的两种模式
讨论塞尔维亚21世纪先锋音乐意味着要解决两个关键现象:(1)先锋派在后现代主义中的地位,这种地位在20世纪70年代中期确立,并在21世纪的过去20年中持续存在;以及(2)对这一立场的修改,自20世纪80年代末以来,这一立场在塞尔维亚音乐中也得到了体现。第一种现象是指后现代主义中的先锋派,就像过去音乐中的任何其他风格一样,缺乏其内部层次和真实性。更准确地说,它被视为艺术品的“集合”,即组成部分,先锋派被“拆解”或“拆解”到其中。第二种现象涉及某种倾向,即通过使用后现代主义工具来精确地超越这种去层次化的冲动。也就是说,它涉及对与过去各种创作倾向相关的指标的后现代主义“验证”,其中也包括一些现代主义概念,包括那些曾经被视为先锋派的概念。换言之,在这两种情况下,塞尔维亚21世纪音乐中的先锋派都不像后现代主义出现之前那样存在,而是成为我认为是后现代主义现象的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Contemporary Music Review provides a forum for musicians and musicologists to discuss recent musical currents in both breadth and depth. The main concern of the journal is the critical study of music today in all its aspects—its techniques of performance and composition, texts and contexts, aesthetics, technologies, and relationships with other disciplines and currents of thought. The journal may also serve as a vehicle to communicate documentary materials, interviews, and other items of interest to contemporary music scholars. All articles are subjected to rigorous peer review before publication. Proposals for themed issues are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信