Governance as civil servant practice(s). A theoretical and analytical contribution.

Q1 Social Sciences
N. Nielsen
{"title":"Governance as civil servant practice(s). A theoretical and analytical contribution.","authors":"N. Nielsen","doi":"10.16995/ee.3004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"How can we understand and analytically grasp the practices that 'operate the state'? Departing in the contemporary focus on 'co-production' in governance regimes such as New Public Management (NPM) and New Public Governance (NPG), the paper critically discusses the foundation of governance studies where a basic distinction between governor and governed tends to be taken for granted and, consequently, left out of the understanding. Against this, it is argued that the Althusserian concept of interpellation installs a necessary connection between a superior Subject - often understood as 'the state' - and dependent subjects. Drawing on Hegel's concept of 'the universal class' ('der allgemeine Stand') and deploying the ethnologically-based life-mode theory, it is asserted that a state-subject can make up a coherent and resilient whole only by encompassing a viable 'civil servant life-mode'. The paper elaborates three principal dimensions of civil servant practices: 'policy-developing', 'operationalizing', and 'policy-implementing'. It presents two contemporary NPG projects in order to discuss, with these concepts, how governance processes operate, even when 'co-production' is a defining characteristic.","PeriodicalId":34928,"journal":{"name":"Ethnologia Europaea","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnologia Europaea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16995/ee.3004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How can we understand and analytically grasp the practices that 'operate the state'? Departing in the contemporary focus on 'co-production' in governance regimes such as New Public Management (NPM) and New Public Governance (NPG), the paper critically discusses the foundation of governance studies where a basic distinction between governor and governed tends to be taken for granted and, consequently, left out of the understanding. Against this, it is argued that the Althusserian concept of interpellation installs a necessary connection between a superior Subject - often understood as 'the state' - and dependent subjects. Drawing on Hegel's concept of 'the universal class' ('der allgemeine Stand') and deploying the ethnologically-based life-mode theory, it is asserted that a state-subject can make up a coherent and resilient whole only by encompassing a viable 'civil servant life-mode'. The paper elaborates three principal dimensions of civil servant practices: 'policy-developing', 'operationalizing', and 'policy-implementing'. It presents two contemporary NPG projects in order to discuss, with these concepts, how governance processes operate, even when 'co-production' is a defining characteristic.
作为公务员的治理实践。理论和分析贡献。
我们如何理解和分析掌握“运行国家”的实践?在新公共管理(NPM)和新公共治理(NPG)等治理制度中,当代关注的是“合作生产”,本文批判性地讨论了治理研究的基础,其中统治者和被统治者之间的基本区别往往被认为是理所当然的,因此,被排除在理解之外。与此相反,有人认为,阿尔都塞的质询概念在上级主体(通常被理解为“国家”)和从属主体之间建立了必要的联系。借鉴黑格尔的“普遍阶级”(“der allgemeine Stand”)概念,运用以民族学为基础的生活模式理论,它断言,一个国家主体只有通过包含一个可行的“公务员生活模式”,才能构成一个连贯和有弹性的整体。本文阐述了公务员实践的三个主要方面:“制定政策”、“实施政策”和“执行政策”。它提出了两个当代NPG项目,以讨论这些概念,治理过程是如何运作的,即使“联合生产”是一个定义特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ethnologia Europaea
Ethnologia Europaea Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信