Improving resilience of sensors in planetary exploration using data-driven models

IF 6.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Dileep Kumar, M. Dominguez-Pumar, Elisa Sayrol-Clols, J. Torres, M. Marín, J. Gómez-Elvira, L. Mora, S. Navarro, J. Rodriguez-Manfredi
{"title":"Improving resilience of sensors in planetary exploration using data-driven models","authors":"Dileep Kumar, M. Dominguez-Pumar, Elisa Sayrol-Clols, J. Torres, M. Marín, J. Gómez-Elvira, L. Mora, S. Navarro, J. Rodriguez-Manfredi","doi":"10.1088/2632-2153/acefaa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improving the resilience of sensor systems in space exploration is a key objective since the environmental conditions to which they are exposed are very harsh. For example, it is known that the presence of flying debris and Dust Devils on the Martian surface can partially damage sensors present in rovers/landers. The objective of this work is to show how data-driven methods can improve sensor resilience, particularly in the case of complex sensors, with multiple intermediate variables, feeding an inverse algorithm (IA) based on calibration data. The method considers three phases: an initial phase in which the sensor is calibrated in the laboratory and an IA is designed; a second phase, in which the sensor is placed at its intended location and sensor data is used to train data-driven model; and a third phase, once the model has been trained and partial damage is detected, in which the data-driven algorithm is reducing errors. The proposed method is tested with the intermediate data of the wind sensor of the TWINS instrument (NASA InSight mission), consisting of two booms placed on the deck of the lander, and three boards per boom. Wind speed and angle are recovered from the intermediate variables provided by the sensor and predicted by the proposed method. A comparative analysis of various data-driven methods including machine learning and deep learning (DL) methods is carried out for the proposed research. It is shown that even a simple method such as k-nearest neighbor is capable of successfully recovering missing data of a board compared to complex DL models. Depending on the selected missing board, errors are reduced by a factor between 2.43 and 4.78, for horizontal velocity; and by a factor between 1.74 and 4.71, for angle, compared with the situation of using only the two remaining boards.","PeriodicalId":33757,"journal":{"name":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Machine Learning Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/acefaa","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving the resilience of sensor systems in space exploration is a key objective since the environmental conditions to which they are exposed are very harsh. For example, it is known that the presence of flying debris and Dust Devils on the Martian surface can partially damage sensors present in rovers/landers. The objective of this work is to show how data-driven methods can improve sensor resilience, particularly in the case of complex sensors, with multiple intermediate variables, feeding an inverse algorithm (IA) based on calibration data. The method considers three phases: an initial phase in which the sensor is calibrated in the laboratory and an IA is designed; a second phase, in which the sensor is placed at its intended location and sensor data is used to train data-driven model; and a third phase, once the model has been trained and partial damage is detected, in which the data-driven algorithm is reducing errors. The proposed method is tested with the intermediate data of the wind sensor of the TWINS instrument (NASA InSight mission), consisting of two booms placed on the deck of the lander, and three boards per boom. Wind speed and angle are recovered from the intermediate variables provided by the sensor and predicted by the proposed method. A comparative analysis of various data-driven methods including machine learning and deep learning (DL) methods is carried out for the proposed research. It is shown that even a simple method such as k-nearest neighbor is capable of successfully recovering missing data of a board compared to complex DL models. Depending on the selected missing board, errors are reduced by a factor between 2.43 and 4.78, for horizontal velocity; and by a factor between 1.74 and 4.71, for angle, compared with the situation of using only the two remaining boards.
使用数据驱动模型提高行星探测中传感器的弹性
提高空间探索中传感器系统的弹性是一个关键目标,因为它们所处的环境条件非常恶劣。例如,众所周知,火星表面存在的飞行碎片和尘魔会部分损坏火星车/着陆器中的传感器。这项工作的目的是展示数据驱动方法如何提高传感器的弹性,特别是在具有多个中间变量的复杂传感器的情况下,基于校准数据提供反向算法(IA)。该方法考虑了三个阶段:在初始阶段,传感器在实验室中进行校准,并设计IA;第二阶段,其中传感器被放置在其预期位置,并且传感器数据用于训练数据驱动的模型;第三阶段,一旦模型经过训练并检测到部分损伤,数据驱动算法就会减少误差。所提出的方法用TWINS仪器(NASA InSight任务)的风传感器的中间数据进行了测试,该仪器由放置在着陆器甲板上的两个吊杆和每个吊杆三块板组成。从传感器提供的中间变量中恢复风速和角度,并通过所提出的方法进行预测。针对所提出的研究,对包括机器学习和深度学习(DL)方法在内的各种数据驱动方法进行了比较分析。结果表明,与复杂的DL模型相比,即使是诸如k近邻之类的简单方法也能够成功地恢复板的丢失数据。根据所选的缺失板,水平速度的误差减少了2.43到4.78之间的系数;对于角度,与仅使用剩余两块板的情况相比,增加了1.74到4.71之间的系数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Machine Learning Science and Technology
Machine Learning Science and Technology Computer Science-Artificial Intelligence
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
86
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: Machine Learning Science and Technology is a multidisciplinary open access journal that bridges the application of machine learning across the sciences with advances in machine learning methods and theory as motivated by physical insights. Specifically, articles must fall into one of the following categories: advance the state of machine learning-driven applications in the sciences or make conceptual, methodological or theoretical advances in machine learning with applications to, inspiration from, or motivated by scientific problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信