Comparative Study of Smear Microscopy, Gene Xpert and Culture and Sensitivity Assays in Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on Sputum Samples among Tuberculosis Suspected Cases in Nyamira County Referral Hospital

Grace Moraa Orina, Samson Adoka Ong'wen, A. Amolo, Ondimu Thomas Orindi
{"title":"Comparative Study of Smear Microscopy, Gene Xpert and Culture and Sensitivity Assays in Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis on Sputum Samples among Tuberculosis Suspected Cases in Nyamira County Referral Hospital","authors":"Grace Moraa Orina, Samson Adoka Ong'wen, A. Amolo, Ondimu Thomas Orindi","doi":"10.4172/2161-1068.1000249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The laboratory diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in resourcelimited \n countries are often based on X-ray and sputum smear microscopy. These diagnostic tools require experts, \n have long turnaround time, and cannot detect resistance to Tuberculosis (TB) drugs and TB in individuals with \n Human immunodeficiency virus. Recently there was development of GeneXpert MTB/Rif assay that has a short \n turnaround time and can detect resistance to rifampicin among TB patients but its utility has not been evaluated in \n Kenya. This study investigated the comparative sensitivity and specificity of smear microscopy and culture relative to GeneXpert MTB/Rif assay among suspected TB patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Nyamira County \n Referral Hospital among suspected TB patients and both results recorded. Culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis served as the reference standard. The results of this study showed that among 682 enrolled participants, \n 182(26.69%) were diagnosed TB positive while 500 (73.31%) no TB. GeneXpert mtb/rif had a higher sensitivity \n (100%) and specificity (99.4%) relative to culture and a positive predictive value of (98.4%) and a negative predictive \n value of (100%). Smear microscopy revealed low sensitivity (26.4%) and a higher specificity (98.2%). A \n concordance analysis of smear microscopy and GeneXpert was done. The findings revealed a significant (patients \n showed resistance to either one of the TB drugs (rifampicin, isoniazid and Ethambutol) while none of the enrolled \n patients were resistant to streptomycin. In conclusion Gene Xpert MTB/Rif test had high sensitivity compared to \n smear microscopy. For rifampicin resistance detection, it provided accurate results. My recommendation to the \n Division of TB and lung diseases is to roll out the Gene Xpert mtb/rif machines to all health care facilities.","PeriodicalId":74235,"journal":{"name":"Mycobacterial diseases : tuberculosis & leprosy","volume":"2017 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2161-1068.1000249","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycobacterial diseases : tuberculosis & leprosy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1068.1000249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The laboratory diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis in resourcelimited countries are often based on X-ray and sputum smear microscopy. These diagnostic tools require experts, have long turnaround time, and cannot detect resistance to Tuberculosis (TB) drugs and TB in individuals with Human immunodeficiency virus. Recently there was development of GeneXpert MTB/Rif assay that has a short turnaround time and can detect resistance to rifampicin among TB patients but its utility has not been evaluated in Kenya. This study investigated the comparative sensitivity and specificity of smear microscopy and culture relative to GeneXpert MTB/Rif assay among suspected TB patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Nyamira County Referral Hospital among suspected TB patients and both results recorded. Culture for Mycobacterium tuberculosis served as the reference standard. The results of this study showed that among 682 enrolled participants, 182(26.69%) were diagnosed TB positive while 500 (73.31%) no TB. GeneXpert mtb/rif had a higher sensitivity (100%) and specificity (99.4%) relative to culture and a positive predictive value of (98.4%) and a negative predictive value of (100%). Smear microscopy revealed low sensitivity (26.4%) and a higher specificity (98.2%). A concordance analysis of smear microscopy and GeneXpert was done. The findings revealed a significant (patients showed resistance to either one of the TB drugs (rifampicin, isoniazid and Ethambutol) while none of the enrolled patients were resistant to streptomycin. In conclusion Gene Xpert MTB/Rif test had high sensitivity compared to smear microscopy. For rifampicin resistance detection, it provided accurate results. My recommendation to the Division of TB and lung diseases is to roll out the Gene Xpert mtb/rif machines to all health care facilities.
尼亚米拉县转诊医院肺结核疑似病例痰液中结核分枝杆菌涂片镜检、基因Xpert及培养及敏感性比较研究
在资源有限的国家,肺结核和涂阴性肺结核的实验室诊断通常基于X射线和痰涂片显微镜。这些诊断工具需要专家,周转时间长,无法检测出对结核病药物的耐药性和人体免疫缺陷病毒感染者的结核病。最近开发了GeneXpert MTB/Rif检测方法,该方法周转时间短,可以检测结核病患者对利福平的耐药性,但其实用性尚未在肯尼亚进行评估。本研究调查了在疑似结核病患者中,涂片显微镜检查和培养与GeneXpert MTB/Rif检测的相对敏感性和特异性。在尼亚米拉县转诊医院对疑似结核病患者进行了一项横断面研究,并记录了这两项结果。结核分枝杆菌培养作为参考标准。这项研究的结果显示,在682名入选参与者中,182人(26.69%)被诊断为结核病阳性,500人(73.31%)没有结核病。相对于培养物,GeneXpert mtb/rif具有更高的敏感性(100%)和特异性(99.4%),阳性预测值为(98.4%),阴性预测值(100%)。涂片镜检显示敏感性低(26.4%),特异性高(98.2%)。对涂片镜检和GeneXpert进行了一致性分析。研究结果显示,显著的(患者对任一种结核病药物(利福平、异烟肼和乙胺丁醇)表现出耐药性,而入选的患者均未对链霉素产生耐药性。结论Gene-Xpert MTB/Rif试验与涂片镜检相比具有较高的敏感性。对于利福平耐药性检测,它提供了准确的结果。我向结核病和肺病司提出的建议是在所有医疗机构推广Gene Xpert mtb/rif机器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信