What Divides, and What Unites, Right-Node Raising

IF 1.6 1区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Linguistic Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1162/ling_a_00454

Zoe Belk;Ad Neeleman;Joy Philip

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We argue, following Barros and Vicente (2011), that right-node raising (RNR) results from either ellipsis or multidominance. Four considerations support this claim. (a) RNR has properties of ellipsis and of multidominance. (b) Where these are combined, the structure results from repeated RNR: a pivot created through ellipsis contains a right-peripheral secondary pivot created through multidominance. (c) In certain circumstances, one or the other derivation is blocked, so that RNR behaves like pure ellipsis or pure multidominance. (d) Linearization of RNR-as-multidominance requires pruning. The same pruning operation delivers RNR-as-ellipsis, which explains why the two derivations must meet the same ordering constraints.

查看原文本刊更多论文

什么分开，什么团结，右节点提升

继Barros和Vicente(2011)之后，我们认为右节点提升(RNR)是由省略或多支配引起的。有四个因素支持这一说法。(a) RNR具有省略性和多优势性。(b)当这些组合在一起时，结构是由重复的RNR产生的:通过省略创建的枢轴包含通过多重支配创建的右外围次要枢轴。(c)在某些情况下，一个或另一个派生被阻塞，因此RNR表现为纯省略号或纯多优势。(d) rnr作为多优势的线性化需要修剪。相同的剪枝操作提供RNR-as-ellipsis，这解释了为什么两个派生必须满足相同的排序约束。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Linguistic Inquiry Multiple-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Linguistic Inquiry leads the field in research on current topics in linguistics. This key resource explores new theoretical developments based on the latest international scholarship, capturing the excitement of contemporary debate in full-scale articles as well as shorter contributions (Squibs and Discussion) and more extensive commentary (Remarks and Replies).