Who Is Being Silenced?: Sociocultural and Privilege Dynamics Within Music Therapy Education

Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1093/mtp/miac023
Debra Jelinek Gombert
{"title":"Who Is Being Silenced?: Sociocultural and Privilege Dynamics Within Music Therapy Education","authors":"Debra Jelinek Gombert","doi":"10.1093/mtp/miac023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This phenomenological study brought a critical lens to the views and contexts of seven music therapists. Semi-structured interviews examined participants’ experiences of the sociocultural and privilege dynamics within music therapy education. Purposive sampling allowed the researcher to center the perspectives of participants who collectively described themselves with intersections of the following identities: black, white, Latinx, Chinese, South East Asian, male, female, non-binary, disabled, non-disabled, straight, pansexual, and one self-identified dyke. An iterative inductive analysis revealed several emergent themes related to inequity and the decentering of minoritized voices within music therapy: the theme A Very White Lens focused on a Eurocentric approach in education and practice that, by failing to acknowledge and center a variety of perspectives, reduces equitable access to both students and clients; Silenced Experiences of Minoritized Voices included participant experiences of anti-Blackness, white privilege, and white fragility within music therapy; When Does Culture Matter? captured responses to and the dangers of an approach that ignores cultural differences; and How We Talk About Culture included concerns and suggestions about the structure of the discourse around cultural intersections, privilege, and race in music therapy education and practice. These findings bring to light some of the structures of power and privilege at the core of music therapists’ education and training. Themes highlighted in this paper center the experiences of individuals who belong to minoritized populations and in so doing, emphasize the need to listen to a greater diversity of voices in the conversation about equity and inclusion in music therapy.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mtp/miac023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This phenomenological study brought a critical lens to the views and contexts of seven music therapists. Semi-structured interviews examined participants’ experiences of the sociocultural and privilege dynamics within music therapy education. Purposive sampling allowed the researcher to center the perspectives of participants who collectively described themselves with intersections of the following identities: black, white, Latinx, Chinese, South East Asian, male, female, non-binary, disabled, non-disabled, straight, pansexual, and one self-identified dyke. An iterative inductive analysis revealed several emergent themes related to inequity and the decentering of minoritized voices within music therapy: the theme A Very White Lens focused on a Eurocentric approach in education and practice that, by failing to acknowledge and center a variety of perspectives, reduces equitable access to both students and clients; Silenced Experiences of Minoritized Voices included participant experiences of anti-Blackness, white privilege, and white fragility within music therapy; When Does Culture Matter? captured responses to and the dangers of an approach that ignores cultural differences; and How We Talk About Culture included concerns and suggestions about the structure of the discourse around cultural intersections, privilege, and race in music therapy education and practice. These findings bring to light some of the structures of power and privilege at the core of music therapists’ education and training. Themes highlighted in this paper center the experiences of individuals who belong to minoritized populations and in so doing, emphasize the need to listen to a greater diversity of voices in the conversation about equity and inclusion in music therapy.
分享
查看原文
谁在沉默?:音乐治疗教育中的社会文化与特权动态
这项现象学研究为七位音乐治疗师的观点和背景带来了批判性的视角。半结构化访谈考察了参与者在音乐治疗教育中的社会文化和特权动态体验。有目的的抽样使研究人员能够集中研究参与者的观点,这些参与者集体描述了自己与以下身份的交叉点:黑人、白人、拉丁裔、中国人、东南亚人、男性、女性、非二元性、残疾人、非残疾人、异性恋、泛性恋和一个自我认同的堤坝。一项迭代归纳分析揭示了几个与音乐治疗中的不公平和少数族裔声音分散有关的新兴主题:主题“非常白的镜头”侧重于教育和实践中以欧洲为中心的方法,由于未能承认和集中各种观点,减少了学生和客户的公平机会;未成年声音的沉默体验包括参与者在音乐治疗中的反黑人、白人特权和白人脆弱的体验;文化何时重要?捕捉到对忽视文化差异的方法的反应和危险;《我们如何谈论文化》包括对音乐治疗教育和实践中围绕文化交叉点、特权和种族的话语结构的关注和建议。这些发现揭示了音乐治疗师教育和培训的核心权力和特权结构。本文强调的主题以少数族裔群体的经历为中心,在这样做的过程中,强调在关于音乐治疗公平和包容的对话中,需要倾听更多多样性的声音。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信