Exploring Self-Determination Outcomes of Racially and Ethnically Marginalized Students With Disabilities in Inclusive, General Education Classrooms

K. Shogren, LaRon A. Scott, Tyler A. Hicks, Sheida K. Raley, Mayumi Hagiwara, Jesse R. Pace, Daria Gerasimova, Abdulaziz H. Alsaeed, Jessie C. Kiblen
{"title":"Exploring Self-Determination Outcomes of Racially and Ethnically Marginalized Students With Disabilities in Inclusive, General Education Classrooms","authors":"K. Shogren, LaRon A. Scott, Tyler A. Hicks, Sheida K. Raley, Mayumi Hagiwara, Jesse R. Pace, Daria Gerasimova, Abdulaziz H. Alsaeed, Jessie C. Kiblen","doi":"10.1352/2326-6988-9.3.189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Opportunities and experiences for all students, including students with intellectual and developmental disabilities, to build self-determination abilities and skills are critical to enable positive postsecondary outcomes (e.g., competitive and integrated employment, community access participation). However, racially and ethnically marginalized students with disabilities might experience fewer opportunities to build self-determination due to systemic issues (e.g., absence of policies emphasizing equity and racial justice, lack of understanding of students' social and cultural capital). The present study is an initial, exploratory analysis to determine if students with disabilities from racially and ethnically marginalized backgrounds reported different self-determination outcomes as they engaged in the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI) in inclusive, general education classrooms. Findings suggested African American/Black students with and without disabilities as well as Hispanic/Latinx students without disabilities scored highest in self-determination at the beginning of the academic year (baseline) and that including disability status crossed with race/ethnicity as a predictor of self-determination baseline improved understanding of the data patterns. Implications for systemic changes to enable equitable education across research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":93183,"journal":{"name":"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inclusion (Washington, D.C.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-9.3.189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Opportunities and experiences for all students, including students with intellectual and developmental disabilities, to build self-determination abilities and skills are critical to enable positive postsecondary outcomes (e.g., competitive and integrated employment, community access participation). However, racially and ethnically marginalized students with disabilities might experience fewer opportunities to build self-determination due to systemic issues (e.g., absence of policies emphasizing equity and racial justice, lack of understanding of students' social and cultural capital). The present study is an initial, exploratory analysis to determine if students with disabilities from racially and ethnically marginalized backgrounds reported different self-determination outcomes as they engaged in the Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction (SDLMI) in inclusive, general education classrooms. Findings suggested African American/Black students with and without disabilities as well as Hispanic/Latinx students without disabilities scored highest in self-determination at the beginning of the academic year (baseline) and that including disability status crossed with race/ethnicity as a predictor of self-determination baseline improved understanding of the data patterns. Implications for systemic changes to enable equitable education across research and practice are discussed.
探索种族和民族边缘化残疾学生在全纳通识课堂中的自决结果
所有学生,包括有智力和发育障碍的学生,都有机会和经验培养自决能力和技能,这对于取得积极的中学后成果(例如,竞争性和综合性就业、社区参与)至关重要。然而,由于系统性问题(例如,缺乏强调公平和种族正义的政策,缺乏对学生社会和文化资本的了解),种族和族裔边缘化的残疾学生建立自决权的机会可能会减少。本研究是一项初步的探索性分析,旨在确定来自种族和族裔边缘化背景的残疾学生在包容性普通教育课堂上参与自主学习教学模式(SDLMI)时是否报告了不同的自决结果。研究结果表明,有残疾和无残疾的非裔美国人/黑人学生以及没有残疾的西班牙裔/拉丁裔学生在学年初的自决得分最高(基线),将残疾状况与种族/族裔交叉作为自决基线的预测因素,提高了对数据模式的理解。讨论了系统性变革对实现研究和实践公平教育的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信