E- Formative Assessment Integration in Collaborative Inquiry: A Strategy to Enhance Students' Conceptual Understanding in Static Fluid Concepts

IF 0.3 Q4 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
S. Kusairi, H. Hardiana, P. Swasono, A. Suryadi, Y. Afrieni
{"title":"E- Formative Assessment Integration in Collaborative Inquiry: A Strategy to Enhance Students' Conceptual Understanding in Static Fluid Concepts","authors":"S. Kusairi, H. Hardiana, P. Swasono, A. Suryadi, Y. Afrieni","doi":"10.15294/JPFI.V17I1.23969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to analyze students' conceptual  understanding and their difficulties in grasping the static fluid concepts after they learned throughout integrated e-formative assessments in collaborative inquiry. This mixed-method research involved 28 senior high school students.  Students studied static fluid concepts with a collaborative inquiry strategy supported by the implementation of web-based formative assessment. Students' conceptual understanding and their difficulties were assessed using multiple-choice questions with the reasons (r= 0.75.). The result showed that students' conceptual understanding was improved after learning, which is indicated by the moderate normalized gain value (0.5374), and the strong effect size (2.772). However, there were still some difficulties that students have regarding factors that influence buoyancy. Providing more portion of the conceptual discussions and practising problem-solving during learning through e-formative assessment were recommended. Learning difficulties that have been found in this study can be considered and anticipated by teachers in teaching static fluid topic.                                                                          ","PeriodicalId":42020,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia-Indonesian Journal of Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/JPFI.V17I1.23969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to analyze students' conceptual  understanding and their difficulties in grasping the static fluid concepts after they learned throughout integrated e-formative assessments in collaborative inquiry. This mixed-method research involved 28 senior high school students.  Students studied static fluid concepts with a collaborative inquiry strategy supported by the implementation of web-based formative assessment. Students' conceptual understanding and their difficulties were assessed using multiple-choice questions with the reasons (r= 0.75.). The result showed that students' conceptual understanding was improved after learning, which is indicated by the moderate normalized gain value (0.5374), and the strong effect size (2.772). However, there were still some difficulties that students have regarding factors that influence buoyancy. Providing more portion of the conceptual discussions and practising problem-solving during learning through e-formative assessment were recommended. Learning difficulties that have been found in this study can be considered and anticipated by teachers in teaching static fluid topic.                                                                          
合作探究中的电子形成性评估整合:提高学生对静态流体概念理解的策略
本研究旨在分析学生在合作探究的综合电子形成性评估中学习后,对静态流体概念Â的理解及掌握困难。这项混合方法的研究涉及28名高中生。Â学生通过基于网络的形成性评估支持的协作探究策略学习静态流体概念。采用多项选择题评估学生的概念理解和困难程度,并给出原因(r= 0.75)。结果表明,学生在学习后对概念的理解有所提高,归一化增益值中等(0.5374),效应量较强(2.772)。然而,对于影响浮力的因素,学生们仍然有一些困难。建议在学习过程中提供更多的概念讨论和通过电子形成性评估练习解决问题。本研究中发现的学习困难,是教师在静力流体主题教学中可以考虑和预见的。十一亿亿亿亿亿亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一万亿亿亿亿亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一亿亿亿亿亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一万亿亿亿亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一亿亿亿亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一万亿亿亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一亿亿亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一万亿亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一亿亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一万亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一亿亿亿亿一千一百一十一万亿亿亿一千一百一十一亿亿亿一千一百一十一万亿亿一千一百一十一亿亿一千一百一十一万亿一千一百一十一亿一千一百一十一万一千一百一十一
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信