Production and nutritional evaluation of cookies blended from sorghum, cowpea, plantain and sweet potato

U. M. Fateema, A. Falmata, B. Bintu, M. Raihanatu, Z. Chellube, H. Hauwa, S. Modu, B. Maryam
{"title":"Production and nutritional evaluation of cookies blended from sorghum, cowpea, plantain and sweet potato","authors":"U. M. Fateema, A. Falmata, B. Bintu, M. Raihanatu, Z. Chellube, H. Hauwa, S. Modu, B. Maryam","doi":"10.5897/IJNAM2014.0178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was carried out to produce and evaluate the nutritional quality of cookies formulated from sorghum and fortified with cowpea, plantain and sweet potato. The sorghum and cowpea were subjected to processing technique of sprouting while plantain and sweet potato was peeled oven dried at 45°C. The sorghum variety used was Chakalari white, a low tannin variety, cowpea (Borno red), plantain (unripe) and sweet potato (Yellow variety). Sorghum (60%) was supplemented with legume and tubers at varying proportions: five formulations were made. The parameters assayed include proximate composition, mineral element, in-vitro protein digestibility, vitamin and tannin content, using standard methods. The result showed a significant protein yield for sorghum 60: Cowpea 40 fortification (12.82±0.00) when compared with the control (unprocessed) (5.07±0.00) and the processed samples at (p<0.05). Increases in moisture, crude protein, and crude fiber content in the formulated cookies were observed. Carbohydrate content of the cookies increased as the level of cowpea flour decreased by 10%. The result showed a percentage increase in the in-vitro protein digestibility of processed samples with cowpea having the maximum level (91.90)% at 6 h digestibility. For the mineral element, there was an increase in Ca and K. For the vitamin content a significant increase was observed in the level of vitamin B6 of processed samples and formulated cookies compared to control. The tannin content of processed sample (1.54%) significantly decreased compared to unprocessed sample (control) 2.07%. The sensory evaluation revealed that SSSC and SSDSp were more acceptable than the other ratio blends. It can be concluded that the nutritional quality of the cookies were improved with the addition of cowpea. Sample with sorghum: cowpea (60:40) is a better option for cookies, as it is more superior in nutrient analysis compared to the remaining ratios. \n \n Key words: Sorghum, cowpea, plantain, sweet potato, cookies.","PeriodicalId":91294,"journal":{"name":"International journal of nutrition and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5897/IJNAM2014.0178","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of nutrition and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5897/IJNAM2014.0178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study was carried out to produce and evaluate the nutritional quality of cookies formulated from sorghum and fortified with cowpea, plantain and sweet potato. The sorghum and cowpea were subjected to processing technique of sprouting while plantain and sweet potato was peeled oven dried at 45°C. The sorghum variety used was Chakalari white, a low tannin variety, cowpea (Borno red), plantain (unripe) and sweet potato (Yellow variety). Sorghum (60%) was supplemented with legume and tubers at varying proportions: five formulations were made. The parameters assayed include proximate composition, mineral element, in-vitro protein digestibility, vitamin and tannin content, using standard methods. The result showed a significant protein yield for sorghum 60: Cowpea 40 fortification (12.82±0.00) when compared with the control (unprocessed) (5.07±0.00) and the processed samples at (p<0.05). Increases in moisture, crude protein, and crude fiber content in the formulated cookies were observed. Carbohydrate content of the cookies increased as the level of cowpea flour decreased by 10%. The result showed a percentage increase in the in-vitro protein digestibility of processed samples with cowpea having the maximum level (91.90)% at 6 h digestibility. For the mineral element, there was an increase in Ca and K. For the vitamin content a significant increase was observed in the level of vitamin B6 of processed samples and formulated cookies compared to control. The tannin content of processed sample (1.54%) significantly decreased compared to unprocessed sample (control) 2.07%. The sensory evaluation revealed that SSSC and SSDSp were more acceptable than the other ratio blends. It can be concluded that the nutritional quality of the cookies were improved with the addition of cowpea. Sample with sorghum: cowpea (60:40) is a better option for cookies, as it is more superior in nutrient analysis compared to the remaining ratios. Key words: Sorghum, cowpea, plantain, sweet potato, cookies.
高粱、豇豆、车前草和甘薯混合饼干的生产及营养评价
本研究以高粱为原料,添加豇豆、车前草和甘薯为强化原料,进行饼干的生产和营养品质评价。对高粱和豇豆进行了发芽加工,对车前草和甘薯进行了45℃烘箱干燥。使用的高粱品种是Chakalari白,低单宁品种,豇豆(博尔诺红),车前草(未成熟)和甘薯(黄色品种)。在高粱(60%)中添加不同比例的豆科植物和块茎,共配制5种配方。采用标准方法测定了样品的近似组成、矿物元素、体外蛋白质消化率、维生素和单宁含量。结果表明:强化高粱60:豇豆40蛋白质产量(12.82±0.00)显著高于未加工对照(5.07±0.00)和加工样品(p<0.05)。观察到配方饼干中水分、粗蛋白质和粗纤维含量的增加。随着豇豆粉含量减少10%,饼干的碳水化合物含量增加。结果表明,加工样品的体外蛋白质消化率有一定的提高,其中豇豆在6 h消化率最高,达到91.90 %。对于矿物质元素,钙和钾含量增加。对于维生素含量,加工样品和配方饼干的维生素B6含量与对照相比显著增加。处理后样品单宁含量(1.54%)较未处理样品(对照)显著降低2.07%。感官评价表明,SSSC和SSDSp比其他比例混合物更容易被接受。由此可见,添加豇豆后,饼干的营养品质得到了改善。高粱:豇豆(60:40)的样品是饼干更好的选择,因为与其他比例相比,它在营养分析方面更优越。关键词:高粱,豇豆,车前草,红薯,饼干
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信