Book Review: Universities and the Labour Market: Graduate Transitions from Education to Employment by Magdalena Jelonek

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Susan Flavelle
{"title":"Book Review: Universities and the Labour Market: Graduate Transitions from Education to Employment by Magdalena Jelonek","authors":"Susan Flavelle","doi":"10.1177/0160449x231169227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Magdalena Jelonek’s Universities and the Labour Market: Transitions from Education to Employment is a critical review of Poland’s Career Development Programme (CDP). A government-led initiative beginning in 2014 that provided grants to postsecondary institutions, CDP was intended to support soon-to-be postsecondary graduates in the transition to full employment by developing in-demand work competences not typically part of university or college curricula. Institutions proposed projects that aligned with one of the five competence streams—professional, communication, IT, analytical, and entrepreneurship—and winning projects would be greenlit and funds allocated to the school. Jelonek uses the outcomes of the program to critically examine the role of universities as economic stimuli and worker competence development at a time when the commodification of higher education is increasingly conspicuous. While the program was not considered a clear success in Poland, Jelonek situates the economic intervention within a labor market that at the time was quickly strengthening after the 2008 global recession in order to better understand its outcomes and how the program can be used as a model moving forward. The first two parts of the book are devoted to contextualizing the socio-economic paradigms that informed the program. Jelonek weaves together a critical analysis of dominant neoliberal ideologies that prioritize labor as human capital and mesh with the growing commodification and “massification” of Poland’s higher education industry (p. 3). She argues that because the value of education is widely regarded as relative, workers are reliant on signaling their skill and competence level to employers. As such, public interventions, such as CDP, lean heavily into performative outcomes such as certificates that can be included in CVs. A material motivation to participate in the CDP skewed participation in favor of competence streams that provided tangible rewards (such as certificates) for completing projects. Additionally, a lack of equitable stop-gaps in the application process led to already well-supported institutions and students winning the majority of the grants. While this divide in accessibility was not officially documented, Jelonek suggests that it had an unintended effect on the documented outcomes of the program. The driving strength of Universities and the Labour Market comes from Jelonek’s dissection of the program’s outcomes in third and final part of the book. In accounting Book Reviews","PeriodicalId":35267,"journal":{"name":"Labor Studies Journal","volume":"48 1","pages":"213 - 214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x231169227","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magdalena Jelonek’s Universities and the Labour Market: Transitions from Education to Employment is a critical review of Poland’s Career Development Programme (CDP). A government-led initiative beginning in 2014 that provided grants to postsecondary institutions, CDP was intended to support soon-to-be postsecondary graduates in the transition to full employment by developing in-demand work competences not typically part of university or college curricula. Institutions proposed projects that aligned with one of the five competence streams—professional, communication, IT, analytical, and entrepreneurship—and winning projects would be greenlit and funds allocated to the school. Jelonek uses the outcomes of the program to critically examine the role of universities as economic stimuli and worker competence development at a time when the commodification of higher education is increasingly conspicuous. While the program was not considered a clear success in Poland, Jelonek situates the economic intervention within a labor market that at the time was quickly strengthening after the 2008 global recession in order to better understand its outcomes and how the program can be used as a model moving forward. The first two parts of the book are devoted to contextualizing the socio-economic paradigms that informed the program. Jelonek weaves together a critical analysis of dominant neoliberal ideologies that prioritize labor as human capital and mesh with the growing commodification and “massification” of Poland’s higher education industry (p. 3). She argues that because the value of education is widely regarded as relative, workers are reliant on signaling their skill and competence level to employers. As such, public interventions, such as CDP, lean heavily into performative outcomes such as certificates that can be included in CVs. A material motivation to participate in the CDP skewed participation in favor of competence streams that provided tangible rewards (such as certificates) for completing projects. Additionally, a lack of equitable stop-gaps in the application process led to already well-supported institutions and students winning the majority of the grants. While this divide in accessibility was not officially documented, Jelonek suggests that it had an unintended effect on the documented outcomes of the program. The driving strength of Universities and the Labour Market comes from Jelonek’s dissection of the program’s outcomes in third and final part of the book. In accounting Book Reviews
书评:《大学和劳动力市场:毕业生从教育到就业的过渡》,作者:Magdalena Jelonek
Magdalena Jelonek的《大学与劳动力市场:从教育到就业的转变》是对波兰职业发展计划(CDP)的一篇批评性评论。CDP是一项始于2014年的政府主导的举措,旨在通过培养需求旺盛的工作能力来支持即将毕业的中学后毕业生向充分就业过渡,而这通常不是大学或学院课程的一部分。各院校提出的项目符合五大能力流之一——专业、沟通、IT、分析和创业——获奖项目将获得批准,资金将分配给学校。杰洛内克利用该项目的成果,批判性地审视了在高等教育商品化日益明显之际,大学作为经济刺激和工人能力发展的作用。虽然该计划在波兰并不明显成功,但杰洛内克将经济干预置于2008年全球经济衰退后迅速加强的劳动力市场中,以更好地了解其结果,以及如何将该计划用作前进的模式。本书的前两部分致力于将为该计划提供信息的社会经济范式置于背景中。杰洛内克对占主导地位的新自由主义意识形态进行了批判性分析,这些意识形态将劳动力视为人力资本,并与波兰高等教育行业日益商品化和“大众化”相结合(第3页)。她认为,由于教育的价值被广泛认为是相对的,工人们依赖于向雇主表明他们的技能和能力水平。因此,公共干预,如CDP,在很大程度上倾向于绩效结果,如可以包含在简历中的证书。参与CDP的物质动机偏向于为完成项目提供有形奖励(如证书)的能力流。此外,申请过程中缺乏公平的权宜之计,导致本已得到良好支持的机构和学生赢得了大部分资助。虽然这种可访问性方面的分歧没有正式记录在案,但杰洛内克认为,这对项目的记录结果产生了意想不到的影响。《大学与劳动力市场》的推动力来自杰洛内克在本书第三部分也是最后一部分对该项目成果的剖析。会计账簿审查
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Labor Studies Journal
Labor Studies Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The Labor Studies Journal is the official journal of the United Association for Labor Education and is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing research on work, workers, labor organizations, and labor studies and worker education in the US and internationally. The Journal is interested in manuscripts using a diversity of research methods, both qualitative and quantitative, directed at a general audience including union, university, and community based labor educators, labor activists and scholars from across the social sciences and humanities. As a multi-disciplinary journal, manuscripts should be directed at a general audience, and care should be taken to make methods, especially highly quantitative ones, accessible to a general reader.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信