Cost-effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation in a single primary care center at a 3-year follow-up

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
F. Ghazal, M. Aronsson, F. Al-Khalili, M. Rosenqvist, L. Levin
{"title":"Cost-effectiveness of screening for atrial fibrillation in a single primary care center at a 3-year follow-up","authors":"F. Ghazal, M. Aronsson, F. Al-Khalili, M. Rosenqvist, L. Levin","doi":"10.1080/14017431.2022.2060523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intermittent electrocardiogram (ECG) screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) among 70–74-year old individuals in primary care. We also aimed to assess adherence to anticoagulants, severe bleeding, stroke and mortality among screening-detected AF cases at three-year follow-up. Methods A post hoc analysis based on a cross-sectional screening study for AF among 70–74-year old patients, who were registered at a single primary care center, was followed for three years for mortality. Data about adherence to anticoagulants, incidence of stroke and severe bleeding among screening-detected AF cases, were collected from patient’s records. Markov model and Monte Carlo simulation were used to assess the cost-effectiveness of the screening program. Results The mortality rate among screening-detected AF cases (n = 16) did not differ compared to the 274 individuals with no AF (hazard ratio 0.86, CI 0.12–6.44). Adherence to anticoagulants was 92%. There was no stroke or severe bleeding. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of screening versus no screening was EUR 2389/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The screening showed a 99% probability of being cost-effective compared to no screening at a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 20,000 per QALY. Conclusion Screening for AF among 70–74-year olds in primary care using intermittent ECG appears to be cost-effective at 3-year follow-up with high anticoagulants adherence and no increased mortality.","PeriodicalId":21383,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"35 - 41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14017431.2022.2060523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Objectives The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of intermittent electrocardiogram (ECG) screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) among 70–74-year old individuals in primary care. We also aimed to assess adherence to anticoagulants, severe bleeding, stroke and mortality among screening-detected AF cases at three-year follow-up. Methods A post hoc analysis based on a cross-sectional screening study for AF among 70–74-year old patients, who were registered at a single primary care center, was followed for three years for mortality. Data about adherence to anticoagulants, incidence of stroke and severe bleeding among screening-detected AF cases, were collected from patient’s records. Markov model and Monte Carlo simulation were used to assess the cost-effectiveness of the screening program. Results The mortality rate among screening-detected AF cases (n = 16) did not differ compared to the 274 individuals with no AF (hazard ratio 0.86, CI 0.12–6.44). Adherence to anticoagulants was 92%. There was no stroke or severe bleeding. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of screening versus no screening was EUR 2389/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. The screening showed a 99% probability of being cost-effective compared to no screening at a willingness-to-pay threshold of EUR 20,000 per QALY. Conclusion Screening for AF among 70–74-year olds in primary care using intermittent ECG appears to be cost-effective at 3-year follow-up with high anticoagulants adherence and no increased mortality.
在单一初级保健中心进行3年随访的心房颤动筛查的成本效益
摘要目的本研究的目的是评估在70–74岁的初级保健人群中进行间歇性心电图(ECG)筛查以治疗心房颤动(AF)的成本效益。我们还旨在评估三年随访中筛查出的房颤病例对抗凝血剂的依从性、严重出血、中风和死亡率。方法对在单一初级保健中心登记的70–74岁患者进行了一项基于房颤横断面筛查研究的事后分析,并对其死亡率进行了三年的随访。从患者记录中收集筛查出的房颤病例中抗凝药物的依从性、中风发生率和严重出血的数据。Markov模型和蒙特卡罗模拟用于评估筛查计划的成本效益。结果筛查发现的房颤患者死亡率(n = 16) 与274名无房颤患者相比没有差异(危险比0.86,CI 0.12–6.44)。抗凝药物的依从性为92%。没有中风或严重出血。筛查与不筛查的成本效益增量比为2389/质量调整生命年(QALY)。在每个QALY支付20000欧元的意愿阈值下,与没有筛查相比,筛查显示出99%的成本效益。结论在初级保健的70–74岁人群中,使用间歇心电图筛查房颤,在3年的随访中似乎具有成本效益,抗凝剂依从性高,死亡率不增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal
Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The principal aim of Scandinavian Cardiovascular Journal is to promote cardiovascular research that crosses the borders between disciplines. The journal is a forum for the entire field of cardiovascular research, basic and clinical including: • Cardiology - Interventional and non-invasive • Cardiovascular epidemiology • Cardiovascular anaesthesia and intensive care • Cardiovascular surgery • Cardiovascular radiology • Clinical physiology • Transplantation of thoracic organs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信