Serious Leisure as Human Resource Development Intervention

IF 4.6 3区管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT

Human Resource Development Review Pub Date : 2023-06-18 DOI:10.1177/15344843231184746

Dawisa Sritanyarat, Asma Tehmarn, Wanida Thongteera, Thawanporn Marin, G. McLean

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Leisure and work are often thought of as independent parts of life. While leisure has the potential of contributing to HRD and vice versa, it has received limited attention in HRD. Therefore, in this study, we used an integrative literature review to explore how leisure can contribute to HRD and become an HRD intervention. To search the literature, we used keywords relating to leisure, work, and HRD. One among several leisure types found was serious leisure. Serious leisure requires engagement in the activity with a sense of self-development. The results from serious leisure could include knowledge and skill development, which might not be related directly to short-term work performance improvement. Despite this, it allows for intrinsically sustainable self-development. Such self-development can yield positive results in every element of life, including work. To facilitate serious leisure as an HRD intervention, practitioners and policymakers need to eliminate leisure constraints.

查看原文本刊更多论文

严肃休闲作为人力资源开发干预

休闲和工作通常被认为是生活中独立的部分。虽然休闲有可能促进人力资源开发，反之亦然，但它在人力资源开发中受到的关注有限。因此，在本研究中，我们使用了一项综合文献综述来探讨休闲如何有助于人力资源开发，并成为人力资源开发的干预措施。为了搜索文献，我们使用了与休闲、工作和人力资源开发相关的关键词。在发现的几种休闲类型中，有一种是严肃休闲。认真的休闲需要有自我发展意识的参与活动。认真休闲的结果可能包括知识和技能的发展，这可能与短期工作表现的改善没有直接关系。尽管如此，它允许本质上可持续的自我发展。这种自我发展可以在生活的各个方面产生积极的结果，包括工作。为了促进作为人力资源开发干预措施的严肃休闲，从业者和政策制定者需要消除休闲限制。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Human Resource Development Review MANAGEMENT-

CiteScore

9.60

自引率

17.20%

发文量

期刊介绍： As described elsewhere, Human Resource Development Review is a theory development journal for scholars of human resource development and related disciplines. Human Resource Development Review publishes articles that make theoretical contributions on theory development, foundations of HRD, theory building methods, and integrative reviews of the relevant literature. Papers whose central focus is empirical findings, including empirical method and design are not considered for publication in Human Resource Development Review. This journal encourages submissions that provide new theoretical insights to advance our understanding of human resource development and related disciplines. Such papers may include syntheses of existing bodies of theory, new substantive theories, exploratory conceptual models, taxonomies and typology developed as foundations for theory, treatises in formal theory construction, papers on the history of theory, critique of theory that includes alternative research propositions, metatheory, and integrative literature reviews with strong theoretical implications. Papers addressing foundations of HRD might address philosophies of HRD, historical foundations, definitions of the field, conceptual organization of the field, and ethical foundations. Human Resource Development Review takes a multi-paradigm view of theory building so submissions from different paradigms are encouraged.