Looking back to predict the future: a review of empirical support for the self-fulfilling prophecy

IF 3.5 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Alexander C. Romney, Jake T. Harrison, Seth Benson
{"title":"Looking back to predict the future: a review of empirical support for the self-fulfilling prophecy","authors":"Alexander C. Romney, Jake T. Harrison, Seth Benson","doi":"10.1108/mrr-01-2022-0051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe aim of this study is to systematically review the scholarly literature on the self-fulfilling prophecy and identify the theoretical and methodological gaps in the literature as a foundation to encourage future research.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nTo develop a theoretical framework for self-fulfilling prophecy research, each empirical article published in a peer-reviewed journal from January 2001 to October 2022 was retrieved using EBSCO’s Business Source Premier database. The keywords “self-fulfilling prophecy,” “Galatea effect,” “Golem effect” and “Pygmalion effect” were used in the Abstract of articles to conduct this literature review.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors developed a 2 × 2 framework that distinguishes self-fulfilling prophecies based on whether they are initiated internally or externally and whether positive or negative outcomes result. The authors then introduce what we label the Eyeore effect. The resulting framework helps identify the need for more research on the golem, Galatea and Eyeore effect.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis review is limited because the authors only reviewed peer-reviewed empirical articles in the English language.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis work provides a meaningful framework to synthesize the types of self-fulfilling prophecies and systematically reviews the state of the literature, as a springboard to identify and encourage fruitful areas of future research.\n","PeriodicalId":47769,"journal":{"name":"Management Research Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mrr-01-2022-0051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The aim of this study is to systematically review the scholarly literature on the self-fulfilling prophecy and identify the theoretical and methodological gaps in the literature as a foundation to encourage future research. Design/methodology/approach To develop a theoretical framework for self-fulfilling prophecy research, each empirical article published in a peer-reviewed journal from January 2001 to October 2022 was retrieved using EBSCO’s Business Source Premier database. The keywords “self-fulfilling prophecy,” “Galatea effect,” “Golem effect” and “Pygmalion effect” were used in the Abstract of articles to conduct this literature review. Findings The authors developed a 2 × 2 framework that distinguishes self-fulfilling prophecies based on whether they are initiated internally or externally and whether positive or negative outcomes result. The authors then introduce what we label the Eyeore effect. The resulting framework helps identify the need for more research on the golem, Galatea and Eyeore effect. Research limitations/implications This review is limited because the authors only reviewed peer-reviewed empirical articles in the English language. Originality/value This work provides a meaningful framework to synthesize the types of self-fulfilling prophecies and systematically reviews the state of the literature, as a springboard to identify and encourage fruitful areas of future research.
回顾预测未来:自我实现预言的实证支持综述
目的本研究的目的是系统回顾有关自我实现预言的学术文献,找出文献中理论和方法上的空白,为进一步的研究奠定基础。设计/方法/方法为了建立自我实现预言研究的理论框架,我们使用EBSCO的Business Source Premier数据库检索了2001年1月至2022年10月在同行评审期刊上发表的每篇实证文章。本文以“自我实现预言”、“加拉蒂亚效应”、“魔像效应”、“皮格马利翁效应”为关键词,在文章摘要中进行文献综述。研究结果作者开发了一个2x2框架,根据自我实现预言是由内部还是外部发起的,以及结果是积极的还是消极的,来区分自我实现预言。然后,作者介绍了我们所称的Eyeore效应。由此产生的框架有助于确定对魔像、加拉蒂亚和伊奥雷效应进行更多研究的必要性。研究局限性/启示本综述的局限性在于作者只回顾了同行评议的英语实证文章。原创性/价值本工作提供了一个有意义的框架来综合自我实现预言的类型,并系统地回顾了文献的现状,作为确定和鼓励未来研究成果丰硕领域的跳板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: Management Research Review publishes a wide variety of articles outlining the latest management research. We emphasize management implication from multiple disciplines. We welcome high quality empirical and theoretical studies, literature reviews, and articles with important tactical implications. Published 12 times a year, the journal prides itself on quick publication of the very latest research in general management. The key issues featured include: Business Ethics and Sustainability Corporate Finance Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management Industrial Relations Information and Knowledge Management International Business Human Resource Management Organizational Theory and Behaviour Production and Operations Management Strategic Management and Leadership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书