A study of Proximal Humerus Fractures treated by Locking Compression plating

Varun Krishna Komuravalli, N. Reddy
{"title":"A study of Proximal Humerus Fractures treated by Locking Compression plating","authors":"Varun Krishna Komuravalli, N. Reddy","doi":"10.47799/pimr.1002.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n \n Background: The treatment of proximal humerus fractures is always a challenge for the Orthopedic surgeon. Proximal humeral fractures are a regular presence in clinics. In the past, the standard treatment method was conservative. The results and functional outcomes, on the other hand, were not favorable. The functional outcomes have been known to improve after the development of locking compression plates. The purpose of this study was to see how functional proximal humerus fractures were treated with locking compression plates fared.\n \n Methods: This cross-sectional interventional prospective study was carried out in the Department of Orthopedics, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences. The study included all adult patients with closed two-part and three-part proximal humerus fractures who were reported within a week after the incident. Based on the sample size calculations and inclusion and exclusion criteria a total of n=35 patients were included in the study. Patients were followed up for 12months after surgery using a typical surgical method with a locking compression plate.\n \n Results: n=35 patients out of which n=19(54.2%) were males and n=16 (45.7%) were females. The distribution based on age involved in patients with fractures showed equal preponderance among 31-35 years and 20-25 years with n=9(25.71%).Neer's classification of fractures of proximal humerus was followed in this study. Most of the patients in n=25 (71.42%) cases were having Neer's Two-part fractures and three-part fractures were found in n=8(22.8%) and four-part in n=2(5.7%). The overall results in the study were 65.71% of patients had excellent results,20% had good results,8.5% had satisfactory results and 5.7% had poor results. \n \n Conclusion: Locking plates are a preferable therapeutic choice for proximal humerus fractures, particularly when the bone quality is poor and the fracture is comminuted. Complication rates can be reduced by using good surgical techniques and selecting the right situations. Proximal humeral internal locking plates continue to provide strong overall functionality.","PeriodicalId":30624,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives In Medical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives In Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47799/pimr.1002.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: The treatment of proximal humerus fractures is always a challenge for the Orthopedic surgeon. Proximal humeral fractures are a regular presence in clinics. In the past, the standard treatment method was conservative. The results and functional outcomes, on the other hand, were not favorable. The functional outcomes have been known to improve after the development of locking compression plates. The purpose of this study was to see how functional proximal humerus fractures were treated with locking compression plates fared. Methods: This cross-sectional interventional prospective study was carried out in the Department of Orthopedics, Prathima Institute of Medical Sciences. The study included all adult patients with closed two-part and three-part proximal humerus fractures who were reported within a week after the incident. Based on the sample size calculations and inclusion and exclusion criteria a total of n=35 patients were included in the study. Patients were followed up for 12months after surgery using a typical surgical method with a locking compression plate. Results: n=35 patients out of which n=19(54.2%) were males and n=16 (45.7%) were females. The distribution based on age involved in patients with fractures showed equal preponderance among 31-35 years and 20-25 years with n=9(25.71%).Neer's classification of fractures of proximal humerus was followed in this study. Most of the patients in n=25 (71.42%) cases were having Neer's Two-part fractures and three-part fractures were found in n=8(22.8%) and four-part in n=2(5.7%). The overall results in the study were 65.71% of patients had excellent results,20% had good results,8.5% had satisfactory results and 5.7% had poor results. Conclusion: Locking plates are a preferable therapeutic choice for proximal humerus fractures, particularly when the bone quality is poor and the fracture is comminuted. Complication rates can be reduced by using good surgical techniques and selecting the right situations. Proximal humeral internal locking plates continue to provide strong overall functionality.
锁定加压钢板治疗肱骨近端骨折的研究
摘要背景:肱骨近端骨折的治疗一直是困扰骨科医生的难题。肱骨近端骨折在临床上是常见的。以往的标准治疗方法为保守治疗。另一方面,结果和功能结果并不理想。已知在开发锁定加压钢板后,功能结果得到改善。本研究的目的是观察锁定加压钢板治疗功能性肱骨近端骨折的效果。方法:横断面介入前瞻性研究在普拉蒂玛医学研究所骨科进行。该研究包括所有在事件发生后一周内报告的肱骨近端闭合性两部分和三部分骨折的成年患者。根据样本量计算和纳入、排除标准,共纳入n=35例患者。患者术后随访12个月,采用典型的手术方法锁定加压钢板。结果:35例患者中,男性19例(54.2%),女性16例(45.7%)。骨折患者的年龄分布在31-35岁和20-25岁之间均占优势,n=9(25.71%)。本研究遵循肱骨近端骨折的Neer分类。n=25例(71.42%)患者多为两段式骨折,n=8例(22.8%)和n=2例(5.7%)患者多为三段式骨折。研究的总体结果为65.71%的患者预后良好,20%的患者预后良好,8.5%的患者预后满意,5.7%的患者预后较差。结论:锁定钢板是治疗肱骨近端骨折的较好选择,特别是当骨质量较差且骨折粉碎性时。通过使用良好的手术技术和选择合适的情况,可以减少并发症的发生率。肱骨近端内锁定钢板继续提供强大的整体功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信