Comparison of Historical Materials for High School and Vocational School in 2013 Curriculum and the Emergency Curriculum

Asyif Awaludin Romadhoni, A. Aman, Raden Roro Anisa Khaura
{"title":"Comparison of Historical Materials for High School and Vocational School in 2013 Curriculum and the Emergency Curriculum","authors":"Asyif Awaludin Romadhoni, A. Aman, Raden Roro Anisa Khaura","doi":"10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.1481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of the covid epidemic, high schools shifted from using the 2013 curriculum to using the emergency curriculum. The purpose of this research was to examine and contrast the emergency curriculum implemented during the pandemic with the high school and vocational school history content from 2013. This research was qualitative in nature, employing a case study approach. The purpose of this study is to investigate the Emergency Curriculum's content standards for high school Indonesian history courses, namely its core competencies and fundamental competencies. There was no discernible shift in the outcomes when comparing the Covid-19 Pandemic Emergency Curriculum to the Core Competencies of Indonesian History in the 2013 Curriculum. This demonstrates that the 2013 Curriculum's key skills served as a foundation for the development of the Covid-19 Pandemic Emergency Curriculum's core competencies. In this situation, there is no significant variation in the kind of competence that students at each grade level in senior High School are expected to acquire. There were ten fewer KD heads in class XI. This occurred because the ideal conditions for learning at a distance were not met. Five KD in competency success indicators tailored to distant learning development is sufficient for pupils to pass class XII of the Covid-19 Pandemic Emergency Curriculum.","PeriodicalId":32470,"journal":{"name":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlIshlah Jurnal Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.1481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a result of the covid epidemic, high schools shifted from using the 2013 curriculum to using the emergency curriculum. The purpose of this research was to examine and contrast the emergency curriculum implemented during the pandemic with the high school and vocational school history content from 2013. This research was qualitative in nature, employing a case study approach. The purpose of this study is to investigate the Emergency Curriculum's content standards for high school Indonesian history courses, namely its core competencies and fundamental competencies. There was no discernible shift in the outcomes when comparing the Covid-19 Pandemic Emergency Curriculum to the Core Competencies of Indonesian History in the 2013 Curriculum. This demonstrates that the 2013 Curriculum's key skills served as a foundation for the development of the Covid-19 Pandemic Emergency Curriculum's core competencies. In this situation, there is no significant variation in the kind of competence that students at each grade level in senior High School are expected to acquire. There were ten fewer KD heads in class XI. This occurred because the ideal conditions for learning at a distance were not met. Five KD in competency success indicators tailored to distant learning development is sufficient for pupils to pass class XII of the Covid-19 Pandemic Emergency Curriculum.
2013年高中、职业学校课程与应急课程史料比较
由于新冠肺炎疫情,高中从使用2013年课程转向使用应急课程。本研究的目的是检查和比较大流行期间实施的应急课程与2013年以来高中和职业学校的历史内容。这项研究本质上是定性的,采用了案例研究的方法。本研究的目的是探讨紧急课程的内容标准,高中印尼历史课程,即其核心能力和基本能力。将2019冠状病毒病大流行应急课程与2013年课程中的印度尼西亚历史核心能力进行比较时,结果没有明显的变化。这表明,2013年课程的关键技能为制定Covid-19大流行应急课程的核心能力奠定了基础。在这种情况下,高中各年级学生期望获得的能力类型没有显著差异。第11班的KD头像少了10个。这是因为远程学习的理想条件没有得到满足。针对远程学习发展量身定制的五项能力成功指标KD足以让学生通过Covid-19大流行应急课程第十二课。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
407
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信