Cost tolerance and South Korean public perceptions of the US military presence

IF 0.6 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
T. Rich, Madelynn Einhorn, Isabel Eliassen
{"title":"Cost tolerance and South Korean public perceptions of the US military presence","authors":"T. Rich, Madelynn Einhorn, Isabel Eliassen","doi":"10.1080/02185377.2022.2150247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n What explains South Korean public perceptions of the US military presence in their country? Most estimates place South Korea’s share of the military costs at around 41%. In 2020, the Trump administration pushed for South Korea to pay five times more than previous agreements, while the Biden administration in 2021 ultimately settled on a 14% increase. However, previous research has not directly tackled whether the public is cost-sensitive to the US presence nor what percentage of the costs the public deems as fair. Through original survey data with an embedded experiment, we identify that public support of the need for American military assistance declined when framed in terms of demands that South Korea pay more. However, we find that the perceived appropriate cost share and overall views of the US military presence were not influenced by demands for a higher cost-share.","PeriodicalId":44333,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Political Science","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02185377.2022.2150247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT What explains South Korean public perceptions of the US military presence in their country? Most estimates place South Korea’s share of the military costs at around 41%. In 2020, the Trump administration pushed for South Korea to pay five times more than previous agreements, while the Biden administration in 2021 ultimately settled on a 14% increase. However, previous research has not directly tackled whether the public is cost-sensitive to the US presence nor what percentage of the costs the public deems as fair. Through original survey data with an embedded experiment, we identify that public support of the need for American military assistance declined when framed in terms of demands that South Korea pay more. However, we find that the perceived appropriate cost share and overall views of the US military presence were not influenced by demands for a higher cost-share.
成本承受能力和韩国公众对美国军事存在的看法
如何解释韩国公众对美国在该国军事存在的看法?大多数人估计韩国在军费开支中所占的份额约为41%。2020年,特朗普政府推动韩国支付比以前协议多五倍的费用,而拜登政府在2021年最终决定增加14%。然而,之前的研究并没有直接涉及公众是否对美国驻军的成本敏感,也没有直接涉及公众认为公平的成本比例。通过带有嵌入式实验的原始调查数据,我们发现,在要求韩国支付更多费用的情况下,公众对美国军事援助需求的支持有所下降。然而,我们发现,认为适当的成本份额和对美国军事存在的总体看法不受更高成本份额要求的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Asian Journal of Political Science ( AJPS) is an international refereed journal affiliated to the Graduate School of Public Administration, Seoul National University. Published since 1993, AJPS is a leading journal on Asian politics and governance. It publishes high-quality original articles in major areas of political science, including comparative politics, political thought, international relations, public policy, and public administration, with specific reference to Asian regions and countries. AJPS aims to address some of the most contemporary political and administrative issues in Asia (especially in East, South, and Southeast Asia) at the local, national, and global levels. The journal can be of great value to academic experts, researchers, and students in the above areas of political science as well as to practical policy makers, state institutions, and international agencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信