Haemodynamic Effects and Complications of Unilateral Spinal versus Standard Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly with Low Ejection Fraction Undergone Lower-Limb Surgery

Mushfiqur Rahman, Mahbubul Hasan Munir, Raihanuddin, Shafiul Alam Shaheen, A. Khan, K. Sardar, A. Chowdhury
{"title":"Haemodynamic Effects and Complications of Unilateral Spinal versus Standard Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly with Low Ejection Fraction Undergone Lower-Limb Surgery","authors":"Mushfiqur Rahman, Mahbubul Hasan Munir, Raihanuddin, Shafiul Alam Shaheen, A. Khan, K. Sardar, A. Chowdhury","doi":"10.3329/dmcj.v5i1.31426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cardiovascular system may be profoundly affected by spinal anaesthesia due to unavoidable sympathetic blockade which is more prominent in elderly.A restricted sympathetic block during spinal anesthesia may minimize hemodynamic changes. Objective: To assess whether a unilateral spinal anaesthesia using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine will restrict the sympathetic block to avoid the undesired cardio vascular effects. Materials and method: In this prospective study 60 ASA Ill and IV patients aged between 60-90 years undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery were included. Patients were divided into two groups. In group-A, dural puncture was performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position with 1.5 mL of hyperbaric bupivacaine. In group-B, it was performed with the patient in a seated position using 1.5 mL hyperbaric bupivacaine. Each patient was then placed in supine position. The speed of injection was 1 mL/30s. Patients were placed in the lateral position with operated side down and kept in this position for 10 minutes. Motor and sensory levels were assessed, and haemodynamic alterations were monitored just after block, 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes of spinal anaesthesia. Results: The demographic data were found similar in both groups. The time to the onset of the sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in group-B. The duration of motor and sensory block was significantly shorter in group-A. Haemodynamically all the parameters revealed better out come in unilateral spinal anesthesia. The incidence of complications (nausea, headache, and hypotension) was also lower in group A. Conclusion: When unilateral spinal anesthesia was performed using a low-dose, low-volume and low-flow injection technique, it provides adequate sensory-motor block and helps to achieve stable hemodynamic parameters during surgery on a lower limb. Furthermore, this technique avoids unnecessary paralysis on the non-operated side. Delta Med Col J. Jan 2017 5(1): 20-24","PeriodicalId":53280,"journal":{"name":"Delta Medical College Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"20-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3329/dmcj.v5i1.31426","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Delta Medical College Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/dmcj.v5i1.31426","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular system may be profoundly affected by spinal anaesthesia due to unavoidable sympathetic blockade which is more prominent in elderly.A restricted sympathetic block during spinal anesthesia may minimize hemodynamic changes. Objective: To assess whether a unilateral spinal anaesthesia using 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine will restrict the sympathetic block to avoid the undesired cardio vascular effects. Materials and method: In this prospective study 60 ASA Ill and IV patients aged between 60-90 years undergoing unilateral lower limb surgery were included. Patients were divided into two groups. In group-A, dural puncture was performed with the patient in the lateral decubitus position with 1.5 mL of hyperbaric bupivacaine. In group-B, it was performed with the patient in a seated position using 1.5 mL hyperbaric bupivacaine. Each patient was then placed in supine position. The speed of injection was 1 mL/30s. Patients were placed in the lateral position with operated side down and kept in this position for 10 minutes. Motor and sensory levels were assessed, and haemodynamic alterations were monitored just after block, 5, 10, 15 and 30 minutes of spinal anaesthesia. Results: The demographic data were found similar in both groups. The time to the onset of the sensory and motor block was significantly shorter in group-B. The duration of motor and sensory block was significantly shorter in group-A. Haemodynamically all the parameters revealed better out come in unilateral spinal anesthesia. The incidence of complications (nausea, headache, and hypotension) was also lower in group A. Conclusion: When unilateral spinal anesthesia was performed using a low-dose, low-volume and low-flow injection technique, it provides adequate sensory-motor block and helps to achieve stable hemodynamic parameters during surgery on a lower limb. Furthermore, this technique avoids unnecessary paralysis on the non-operated side. Delta Med Col J. Jan 2017 5(1): 20-24
单侧脊髓麻醉与标准脊髓麻醉对老年人低射血分数下肢手术的血流动力学影响及并发症
背景:由于不可避免的交感神经阻滞,心血管系统可能会受到脊髓麻醉的深刻影响,而交感神经阻滞在老年人中更为突出。脊髓麻醉期间限制性交感神经阻滞可以最大限度地减少血液动力学变化。目的:评估使用0.5%高压布比卡因的单侧脊麻是否会限制交感神经阻滞,以避免不良的心血管影响。材料和方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,纳入了60名年龄在60-90岁之间接受单侧下肢手术的ASA III和IV患者。患者被分为两组。在A组中,患者侧卧位用1.5mL高压布比卡因进行硬膜穿刺。在B组中,患者坐着使用1.5 mL高压布比卡因。然后将每位患者置于仰卧位。注射速度为1mL/30s。患者被放置在侧位,手术侧朝下,并在该位置保持10分钟。对运动和感觉水平进行评估,并在阻滞后、5分钟、10分钟、15分钟和30分钟对血液动力学变化进行监测。结果:两组的人口统计数据相似。B组出现感觉和运动阻滞的时间明显缩短。A组运动和感觉阻滞的持续时间明显缩短。在血液动力学上,所有显示的参数在单侧脊柱麻醉中表现较好。A组的并发症(恶心、头痛和低血压)发生率也较低。结论:当使用低剂量、低容量和低流量的注射技术进行单侧脊柱麻醉时,它可以提供足够的感觉运动阻滞,并有助于在下肢手术中实现稳定的血液动力学参数。此外,这种技术避免了非手术侧不必要的瘫痪。德尔塔医学杂志2017年1月5(1):20-24
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信