Using an improved 3SFCA method to assess inequities associated with multimodal accessibility to green spaces based on mismatches between supply and demand in the metropolitan of Shanghai, China
IF 10.5 1区 工程技术Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
{"title":"Using an improved 3SFCA method to assess inequities associated with multimodal accessibility to green spaces based on mismatches between supply and demand in the metropolitan of Shanghai, China","authors":"Huilin Liang, Qi Yan, Yujia Yan, Qingping Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2023.104456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The problem that limited green spaces do not meet the increasingly demands of people living in urbanized areas is a global concerning. This study employed an improved 3SFCA<span> method to estimate urban green space accessibility (UGSA) for residents in Shanghai based on walking, cycling, driving and public transport<span> travel modes. It also integrated the Gini index and multiple spatial autocorrelations to evaluate the inequity and spatial disparity associated with UGSA from demand, supply and demand-supply-relationship aspects. An importance-performance analysis was conducted to identify improvement priorities for communities. The findings showed that UGSA in Shanghai was clearly unequal. Higher speed travel modes, such as driving, led to better and more equal UGSA than lower speed modes, such as walking. Old towns were generally more equal than built-up districts. The communities with worse and better UGSA supply results were mainly located in and out of the central city areas, respectively. The population demand index showed that communities with a high-supply-low-demand UGSA mismatch and a high-supply-high-demand UGSA match were in urgent and sub-urgent need of UGSA improvements, respectively, and that they were mainly clustered in the central city area. These clusters were very different to the results based on the population variable.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"91 ","pages":"Article 104456"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670723000677","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
The problem that limited green spaces do not meet the increasingly demands of people living in urbanized areas is a global concerning. This study employed an improved 3SFCA method to estimate urban green space accessibility (UGSA) for residents in Shanghai based on walking, cycling, driving and public transport travel modes. It also integrated the Gini index and multiple spatial autocorrelations to evaluate the inequity and spatial disparity associated with UGSA from demand, supply and demand-supply-relationship aspects. An importance-performance analysis was conducted to identify improvement priorities for communities. The findings showed that UGSA in Shanghai was clearly unequal. Higher speed travel modes, such as driving, led to better and more equal UGSA than lower speed modes, such as walking. Old towns were generally more equal than built-up districts. The communities with worse and better UGSA supply results were mainly located in and out of the central city areas, respectively. The population demand index showed that communities with a high-supply-low-demand UGSA mismatch and a high-supply-high-demand UGSA match were in urgent and sub-urgent need of UGSA improvements, respectively, and that they were mainly clustered in the central city area. These clusters were very different to the results based on the population variable.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including:
1. Smart cities and resilient environments;
2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management;
3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management);
4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities;
5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments;
6. Green infrastructure and BMPs;
7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management;
8. Urban agriculture and forestry;
9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure;
10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy;
11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities;
12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities;
13. Health monitoring and improvement;
14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies;
15. Smart city governance;
16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society;
17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies;
18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems.
19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management;
20. Waste reduction and recycling;
21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling;
22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;