A multi-industry and cross-country comparison of technology contribution to formal and informal knowledge sharing processes for innovativeness

IF 3 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Wioleta Kucharska, G. Scott Erickson
{"title":"A multi-industry and cross-country comparison of technology contribution to formal and informal knowledge sharing processes for innovativeness","authors":"Wioleta Kucharska,&nbsp;G. Scott Erickson","doi":"10.1002/kpm.1755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study explores the impact of organizational information technology (IT) competency on knowledge sharing, both explicit and tacit, in the context of innovativeness of products and processes. Knowledge sharing is then assessed in terms of tacit-to-explicit conversion and the impact of both types of knowledge on organizational innovation. Both process (internal) and product/service (external) innovation are included. As an extension, this IT competency to innovation framework is evaluated in context, both by nation (Poland and the United States) and by industry (IT, construction, and healthcare). The results obtained through the structural equation modeling method (sample size 2168 cases in total) exposed that IT competency dimensions matter for formal and informal knowledge-sharing processes and vary across countries and industries. For instance, in the US IT industry, IT-infrastructure, IT-knowledge, and IT-operations dimensions equally support explicit (formal) and tacit (informal) knowledge sharing. On the contrary, for the same industry in Poland, all dimensions support explicit knowledge sharing but regarding tacit knowledge sharing, only IT-knowledge supports it. Summing up the general findings, this study exposes that for tacit knowledge sharing, the critical IT-competency dimension is IT-knowledge, whereas for explicit- IT operations. Next, it clarifies that tacit knowledge sharing supports the explicit, and both are needed to introduce external innovations thanks to their significant impact on internal processes improvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":46428,"journal":{"name":"Knowledge and Process Management","volume":"30 3","pages":"300-316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/kpm.1755","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Knowledge and Process Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/kpm.1755","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The study explores the impact of organizational information technology (IT) competency on knowledge sharing, both explicit and tacit, in the context of innovativeness of products and processes. Knowledge sharing is then assessed in terms of tacit-to-explicit conversion and the impact of both types of knowledge on organizational innovation. Both process (internal) and product/service (external) innovation are included. As an extension, this IT competency to innovation framework is evaluated in context, both by nation (Poland and the United States) and by industry (IT, construction, and healthcare). The results obtained through the structural equation modeling method (sample size 2168 cases in total) exposed that IT competency dimensions matter for formal and informal knowledge-sharing processes and vary across countries and industries. For instance, in the US IT industry, IT-infrastructure, IT-knowledge, and IT-operations dimensions equally support explicit (formal) and tacit (informal) knowledge sharing. On the contrary, for the same industry in Poland, all dimensions support explicit knowledge sharing but regarding tacit knowledge sharing, only IT-knowledge supports it. Summing up the general findings, this study exposes that for tacit knowledge sharing, the critical IT-competency dimension is IT-knowledge, whereas for explicit- IT operations. Next, it clarifies that tacit knowledge sharing supports the explicit, and both are needed to introduce external innovations thanks to their significant impact on internal processes improvement.

Abstract Image

技术对创新的正式和非正式知识共享过程的贡献的多行业和跨国比较
本研究探讨了在产品和流程创新的背景下,组织信息技术(IT)能力对显性和隐性知识共享的影响。然后从隐性到显性的转换以及两种类型的知识对组织创新的影响两方面来评估知识共享。过程(内部)和产品/服务(外部)创新都包括在内。作为扩展,这个IT能力创新框架在上下文中进行评估,包括国家(波兰和美国)和行业(IT、建筑和医疗保健)。通过结构方程建模方法获得的结果(总共2168例样本大小)表明,IT能力维度对正式和非正式的知识共享过程很重要,并且在不同国家和行业中有所不同。例如,在美国IT行业,IT基础设施、IT知识和IT操作维度同样支持明确的(正式的)和隐性的(非正式的)知识共享。相反,对于波兰的同一行业,所有维度都支持显性知识共享,而对于隐性知识共享,只有it知识支持。总结研究结果,本研究发现对于隐性知识共享而言,关键的IT能力维度是IT知识,而对于显性IT运营而言,关键的IT能力维度是IT知识。其次,它阐明了隐性知识共享支持显性知识共享,并且由于它们对内部流程改进的重大影响,引入外部创新都需要隐性知识共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
16.20%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Knowledge and Process Management aims to provide essential information to executives responsible for driving performance improvement in their business or for introducing new ideas to business through thought leadership. The journal meets executives" needs for practical information on the lessons learned from other organizations in the areas of: - knowledge management - organizational learning - core competences - process management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信