Parameters Of Myocardial Electrical Instability In Patients After Myocardial Infarction Comorbid With A Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19)

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
A. Tonkoglaz, E. Averyanova, Y. Barmenkova, Maryam A. Yangurazova, M. Lukyanova, V. Oleynikov
{"title":"Parameters Of Myocardial Electrical Instability In Patients After Myocardial Infarction Comorbid With A Novel Coronavirus Infection (COVID-19)","authors":"A. Tonkoglaz, E. Averyanova, Y. Barmenkova, Maryam A. Yangurazova, M. Lukyanova, V. Oleynikov","doi":"10.15275/rusomj.2022.0409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective — This article aims to assess parameters of myocardial electrical instability and arrhythmic events in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), with and without ST-segment elevation, comorbid/noncomorbid with a novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) using a long-term electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Methods — The study included 64 subjects: 25 (39%) patients with MI comorbid with COVID-19 (MI+C group) and 39 (61%) patients with MI noncomorbid with a novel coronavirus infection (MI group). The mean age of patients was 54.3±6.8 years. A long-term ECG monitoring for 97.4 (95% CI 77.9-115.2) hours was performed with Astrocard®-Telemetry system (Meditek JSC, Russia), starting from the 4th day of MI. Rhythm and conduction disorders, along with ischemic episodes were recorded; an analysis of ventricular late potentials, heart rate turbulence, and QT dispersion was carried out. Results — There were no differences in the frequency of delayed afterdepolarizations in MI and MI+C groups: 15-28% and 18-33% of patients, respectively. An analysis of turbulence parameters did not reveal statistically significant differences between the groups. Such arrhythmic events as frequent supraventricular extrasystole and life-threatening arrhythmias (ventricular extrasystole of grade 4A and higher sensu B. Lown and M. Wolf) were recorded significantly more often in the MI+C group than in the MI group: 48% vs. 20.5% (p=0.021) and 24% vs. 5.1% (p=0.026), respectively. Conclusion — The novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) exacerbates myocardial electrophysiological heterogeneity in the acute cardiovascular event and is associated with an increase in clinically significant arrhythmic events.","PeriodicalId":21426,"journal":{"name":"Russian Open Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Open Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15275/rusomj.2022.0409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective — This article aims to assess parameters of myocardial electrical instability and arrhythmic events in patients after myocardial infarction (MI), with and without ST-segment elevation, comorbid/noncomorbid with a novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) using a long-term electrocardiographic (ECG) monitoring. Methods — The study included 64 subjects: 25 (39%) patients with MI comorbid with COVID-19 (MI+C group) and 39 (61%) patients with MI noncomorbid with a novel coronavirus infection (MI group). The mean age of patients was 54.3±6.8 years. A long-term ECG monitoring for 97.4 (95% CI 77.9-115.2) hours was performed with Astrocard®-Telemetry system (Meditek JSC, Russia), starting from the 4th day of MI. Rhythm and conduction disorders, along with ischemic episodes were recorded; an analysis of ventricular late potentials, heart rate turbulence, and QT dispersion was carried out. Results — There were no differences in the frequency of delayed afterdepolarizations in MI and MI+C groups: 15-28% and 18-33% of patients, respectively. An analysis of turbulence parameters did not reveal statistically significant differences between the groups. Such arrhythmic events as frequent supraventricular extrasystole and life-threatening arrhythmias (ventricular extrasystole of grade 4A and higher sensu B. Lown and M. Wolf) were recorded significantly more often in the MI+C group than in the MI group: 48% vs. 20.5% (p=0.021) and 24% vs. 5.1% (p=0.026), respectively. Conclusion — The novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) exacerbates myocardial electrophysiological heterogeneity in the acute cardiovascular event and is associated with an increase in clinically significant arrhythmic events.
心肌梗死合并新型冠状病毒感染(新冠肺炎)患者心肌电不稳定性参数
目的:本文旨在通过长期心电图(ECG)监测,评估心肌梗死(MI)患者心肌电不稳定和心律失常事件的参数,不论有无st段抬高,合并/非合并新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)。方法:本研究纳入64例受试者:25例(39%)心肌梗死合并COVID-19患者(心肌梗死+C组)和39例(61%)心肌梗死合并新型冠状病毒感染患者(心肌梗死组)。患者平均年龄54.3±6.8岁。使用Astrocard®-遥测系统(Meditek JSC,俄罗斯)从心肌梗死第4天开始进行97.4 (95% CI 77.9-115.2)小时的长期心电图监测。记录心律和传导障碍以及缺血性发作;分析心室晚电位、心率动荡和QT离散度。结果- MI组和MI+C组延迟去极化频率无差异:分别为15-28%和18-33%的患者。对湍流参数的分析并没有显示两组之间有统计学上的显著差异。心肌梗死+C组发生频繁室上性心动过速和危及生命的心律失常(4A级及更高感B. low和M. Wolf室性心动过速)的频率明显高于心肌梗死组:分别为48%比20.5% (p=0.021)和24%比5.1% (p=0.026)。结论:新型冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)加剧了急性心血管事件的心肌电生理异质性,并与临床显著性心律失常事件的增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Russian Open Medical Journal
Russian Open Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Russian Open Medical Journal (RusOMJ) (ISSN 2304-3415) is an international peer reviewed open access e-journal. The website is updated quarterly with the RusOMJ’s latest original research, clinical studies, case reports, reviews, news, and comment articles. This Journal devoted to all field of medicine. All the RusOMJ’s articles are published in full on www.romj.org with open access and no limits on word counts. Our mission is to lead the debate on health and to engage, inform, and stimulate doctors, researchers, and other health professionals in ways that will improve outcomes for patients. The RusOMJ team is based mainly in Saratov (Russia), although we also have editors elsewhere in Russian and in other countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信