An Overview of Research Trend on Merit System in Indonesia and International Practices: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization

Mutia Rahmah, M. Hamdi
{"title":"An Overview of Research Trend on Merit System in Indonesia and International Practices: A Bibliometric Analysis and Visualization","authors":"Mutia Rahmah, M. Hamdi","doi":"10.21787/jbp.14.2022.55-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study intends to examine how the development of research related to the merit system in Indonesia and international practices. Bibliometric analysis is used to determine the dynamics of the research topics discussed related to the merit system through keywords that appear in the Scopus database until January 7, 2022. Visualization from bibliometric based on co-authorship, co-occurrence, and citation using VOSviewer 1.6.16. This study showed 485 articles had been filtered through the criteria of Open Access, Article, English, and Journal. Six of the 485 articles discussed various aspects of the merit system in Indonesia. In Co-authorship, there are eight of 23 clusters written by more than two people collaborating; the United Kingdom is the highest number of articles published, while Indonesia also appears in the visualization but does not collaborate with affiliated authors from other countries. In co-occurrence, 22 clusters of 1,503 keywords emerge, and 234 meet the threshold. The meritocracy item has the highest link and total link strength, but this item was published on average around the year 2018. In terms of citation, eight of the ten most-cited documents were published more than the last ten years, while the other two documents were published in the last eight years. The document of Pratto f. 1994 was the highest citation document and became an important article related to the merit system discussing social dominance orientation which looks at inequality in social groups.","PeriodicalId":52606,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Bina Praja","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Bina Praja","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.14.2022.55-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study intends to examine how the development of research related to the merit system in Indonesia and international practices. Bibliometric analysis is used to determine the dynamics of the research topics discussed related to the merit system through keywords that appear in the Scopus database until January 7, 2022. Visualization from bibliometric based on co-authorship, co-occurrence, and citation using VOSviewer 1.6.16. This study showed 485 articles had been filtered through the criteria of Open Access, Article, English, and Journal. Six of the 485 articles discussed various aspects of the merit system in Indonesia. In Co-authorship, there are eight of 23 clusters written by more than two people collaborating; the United Kingdom is the highest number of articles published, while Indonesia also appears in the visualization but does not collaborate with affiliated authors from other countries. In co-occurrence, 22 clusters of 1,503 keywords emerge, and 234 meet the threshold. The meritocracy item has the highest link and total link strength, but this item was published on average around the year 2018. In terms of citation, eight of the ten most-cited documents were published more than the last ten years, while the other two documents were published in the last eight years. The document of Pratto f. 1994 was the highest citation document and became an important article related to the merit system discussing social dominance orientation which looks at inequality in social groups.
印尼绩效制度研究趋势与国际实践综述:文献计量分析与可视化
本研究旨在探讨如何发展与印尼绩效制度相关的研究和国际实践。文献计量分析用于通过出现在Scopus数据库中的关键词来确定与绩效体系相关的研究主题的动态,直到2022年1月7日。使用VOSviewer 1.6.16从基于共同作者、共现和引文的文献计量学中获得可视化。本研究显示,485篇文章通过开放获取、文章、英语和期刊的标准进行了筛选。485篇文章中有6篇讨论了印尼绩效制度的各个方面。在Co-authorship中,23个集群中有8个是由两个以上的人合作编写的;英国发表的文章数量最多,而印度尼西亚也出现在可视化中,但没有与其他国家的附属作者合作。在共现中,出现了22个包含1503个关键词的聚类,其中234个符合阈值。精英项目的链接和总链接强度最高,但该项目平均在2018年左右发布。在被引频次方面,被引频次最多的10篇文献中,有8篇发表于最近10年以上,另外2篇发表于最近8年。Pratto f. 1994的文件是最高的引用文件,并成为与讨论社会优势取向的绩效制度相关的重要文章,该制度着眼于社会群体中的不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信