Dual cortical tunneling method for endoscopic forehead lift

IF 0.2 Q4 SURGERY
Mijung Kim, N. Lee, W. Tark, W. Lee, T. Roh, Wooyeol Baek
{"title":"Dual cortical tunneling method for endoscopic forehead lift","authors":"Mijung Kim, N. Lee, W. Tark, W. Lee, T. Roh, Wooyeol Baek","doi":"10.14730/aaps.2022.00444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Endoscopic forehead lift with cortical tunneling is an effective option for rejuvenation of the upper third of the face. Although it has been considered safe and reliable, with relatively consistent long-term results, relapse and weakening of adhesion have been common problems.Methods We suggest the dual-tunneling method for overcoming these limitations. A total of 100 patients aged 17 to 65 years underwent forehead lifting with cortical tunneling by the senior author from August 2016 to December 2017. The single-tunnel method was applied in one half of the patients and the dual-tunnel method in the other half. Bilateral brow positions were measured immediately following surgery and 6 months later.Results For all cases, cortical tunneling was done at the central incision and both paramedian incisions; therefore, three tunnels were used in the control group and six tunnels in the experimental group. In the single-tunnel group, relapse distances were 2.39±0.83 mm for the medial brow and 3.26±0.91 mm for the lateral brow (6 months postoperatively; n=100). The dual-tunnel group showed significantly smaller (P<0.001) relapse distances, with values of 1.69±0.46 mm and 2.17±0.59 mm for the medial and lateral brow, respectively (6 months postoperatively; n=100). The experimental group did not show an increase in complications.Conclusions The dual-tunneling method, designed to minimize the cheese-wiring effect, uses a triangular plane to avoid a focal fixation. The fixation also includes the periosteum to hold the forehead tissue in place, inducing stronger adhesion.","PeriodicalId":41514,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2022.00444","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Endoscopic forehead lift with cortical tunneling is an effective option for rejuvenation of the upper third of the face. Although it has been considered safe and reliable, with relatively consistent long-term results, relapse and weakening of adhesion have been common problems.Methods We suggest the dual-tunneling method for overcoming these limitations. A total of 100 patients aged 17 to 65 years underwent forehead lifting with cortical tunneling by the senior author from August 2016 to December 2017. The single-tunnel method was applied in one half of the patients and the dual-tunnel method in the other half. Bilateral brow positions were measured immediately following surgery and 6 months later.Results For all cases, cortical tunneling was done at the central incision and both paramedian incisions; therefore, three tunnels were used in the control group and six tunnels in the experimental group. In the single-tunnel group, relapse distances were 2.39±0.83 mm for the medial brow and 3.26±0.91 mm for the lateral brow (6 months postoperatively; n=100). The dual-tunnel group showed significantly smaller (P<0.001) relapse distances, with values of 1.69±0.46 mm and 2.17±0.59 mm for the medial and lateral brow, respectively (6 months postoperatively; n=100). The experimental group did not show an increase in complications.Conclusions The dual-tunneling method, designed to minimize the cheese-wiring effect, uses a triangular plane to avoid a focal fixation. The fixation also includes the periosteum to hold the forehead tissue in place, inducing stronger adhesion.
内窥镜前额提拉术的双皮质隧道法
背景:内窥镜前额提拉加皮质隧道术是面部上三分之一年轻化的有效选择。尽管它被认为是安全可靠的,并且具有相对一致的长期结果,但复发和粘附减弱一直是常见的问题。方法我们建议采用双重隧道法来克服这些限制。2016年8月至2017年12月,共有100名年龄在17岁至65岁之间的患者接受了资深作者的前额提升和皮质隧道术。其中一半患者采用单隧道法,另一半患者采用双隧道法。术后立即测量双侧眉骨位置,6个月后测量。结果所有病例均在正中切口和正中旁切口行皮质隧道术;因此,对照组使用了三个隧道,实验组使用了六个隧道。在单隧道组中,内侧眉和外侧眉的复发距离分别为2.39±0.83mm和3.26±0.91mm(术后6个月;n=100)。双隧道组的复发距离明显较小(P<0.001),内侧和外侧眉的复发距离分别为1.69±0.46 mm和2.17±0.59 mm(术后6个月;n=100)。实验组的并发症没有增加。结论双隧道法是为了最大限度地减少奶酪布线效应而设计的,使用三角形平面来避免焦点固定。固定还包括骨膜,以将前额组织固定到位,从而诱导更强的粘附力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
35
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信