Bowls-unblocking and mind-regulating acupuncture therapy for constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: An exploratory randomized clinical trial 通腑调神针法治疗便秘型肠易激综合征:随机对照试验

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
Qiu-ping LUO (罗秋平) , Sha-sha KUANG (况莎莎) , Xiao-fang YANG (杨孝芳) , Ling-min JIN (金灵敏) , Pan-bi CHEN (陈盼碧) , Yi CHEN (陈艺) , Wen-rui FAN (范文睿)
{"title":"Bowls-unblocking and mind-regulating acupuncture therapy for constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome: An exploratory randomized clinical trial 通腑调神针法治疗便秘型肠易激综合征:随机对照试验","authors":"Qiu-ping LUO (罗秋平) ,&nbsp;Sha-sha KUANG (况莎莎) ,&nbsp;Xiao-fang YANG (杨孝芳) ,&nbsp;Ling-min JIN (金灵敏) ,&nbsp;Pan-bi CHEN (陈盼碧) ,&nbsp;Yi CHEN (陈艺) ,&nbsp;Wen-rui FAN (范文睿)","doi":"10.1016/j.wjam.2023.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To observe the effects of bowls-unblocking and mind-regulating acupuncture therapy<span> on constipation, anxiety, depression and serum neuropeptide Y<span> (NPY) content for the patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C).</span></span></p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Forty-two IBS-C patients were randomly assigned either into a bowls-unblocking and mind-regulating acupuncture group (acupuncture group) or a mosapride citrate<span> group (medication group) with 21 cases in each group. During the treatment, one patient in the medication group was excluded and 20 patients were included in final statistical analysis; while 21 patients completed the trial in the acupuncture group. Before treatment, after treatment and in follow-up (1 month after the whole treatment), the scores of the Cleveland clinical constipation scoring system (CCS), the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and the self-rating depression scale (SDS) were assessed in both groups. The changes in NPY content were compared before and after treatment.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>① Total score of CCS: after treatment, the total score in the acupuncture group and the medication group were (4.76 ± 2.10) points and (5.60 ± 1.88) points, respectively, which were significantly lower than those before treatment in both groups (both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05); and the difference in the score was not significant for the between-group comparison (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). In the follow-up, the total scores were (4.19 ± 1.69) points in the acupuncture group, and was (6.35 ± 2.06) points in the medication group. The score in the medication group was higher than that after treatment in the same group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), but there was no significant difference between acupuncture group and the medication group (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). ② SAS score: after treatment, the SAS scores were (50.24 ± 2.19) points and (53.45 ± 2.46) points in the acupuncture group and the medication group, respectively, which was lower than that before treatment in the two groups (both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05); and the difference in the score was significant between two groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). In the follow-up, the scores were (51.95 ± 2.27) points and (54.55 ± 1.67) points in the acupuncture group and the medication group, respectively; which was lower than that before treatment in the two groups (both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05), and the difference in the score was significant between two groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). ③SDS score: after treatment, the SDS scores were (50.71 ± 2.70) points and (53.15 ± 2.25) points in the acupuncture group and the medication group, respectively, which was significantly lower than that before treatment in the two groups (both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05); and the difference in the score was significant between the two group (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). In the follow-up, the score of the acupuncture group was (52.57 ± 3.72) points and it was (56.60 ± 2.42) points in the medication group, which was significantly lower than that before treatment in the two groups (both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05); and the difference in the score was significant between the two groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). ④Comparison of serum NPY content: after treatment, the serum NPY content of the acupuncture group and the medication group were (7.08 ± 3.02) mmol/L and (9.89 ± 3.82) mmol/L, respectively, which was significantly lower than that before treatment within each group (both <em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). The difference was significant between the two groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). ⑤ Effective rate: after treatment, the total effective rate was 95.24% in the acupuncture group and 90.00% in the medication group, without statistically significant difference (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>bowls-unblocking and mind-regulating acupuncture therapy relieved the defecation-related symptoms, anxiety, and depression in IBS-C patients; and it was more effective on abdominal pain compared with mosapride citrate. Acupuncture therapy also had some long-term effect, which may be related to its regulatory effect on the serum NPY content.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":44648,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion","volume":"33 2","pages":"Pages 90-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1003525723000065","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To observe the effects of bowls-unblocking and mind-regulating acupuncture therapy on constipation, anxiety, depression and serum neuropeptide Y (NPY) content for the patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C).

Methods

Forty-two IBS-C patients were randomly assigned either into a bowls-unblocking and mind-regulating acupuncture group (acupuncture group) or a mosapride citrate group (medication group) with 21 cases in each group. During the treatment, one patient in the medication group was excluded and 20 patients were included in final statistical analysis; while 21 patients completed the trial in the acupuncture group. Before treatment, after treatment and in follow-up (1 month after the whole treatment), the scores of the Cleveland clinical constipation scoring system (CCS), the self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), and the self-rating depression scale (SDS) were assessed in both groups. The changes in NPY content were compared before and after treatment.

Results

① Total score of CCS: after treatment, the total score in the acupuncture group and the medication group were (4.76 ± 2.10) points and (5.60 ± 1.88) points, respectively, which were significantly lower than those before treatment in both groups (both P < 0.05); and the difference in the score was not significant for the between-group comparison (P > 0.05). In the follow-up, the total scores were (4.19 ± 1.69) points in the acupuncture group, and was (6.35 ± 2.06) points in the medication group. The score in the medication group was higher than that after treatment in the same group (P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between acupuncture group and the medication group (P > 0.05). ② SAS score: after treatment, the SAS scores were (50.24 ± 2.19) points and (53.45 ± 2.46) points in the acupuncture group and the medication group, respectively, which was lower than that before treatment in the two groups (both P < 0.05); and the difference in the score was significant between two groups (P < 0.05). In the follow-up, the scores were (51.95 ± 2.27) points and (54.55 ± 1.67) points in the acupuncture group and the medication group, respectively; which was lower than that before treatment in the two groups (both P < 0.05), and the difference in the score was significant between two groups (P < 0.05). ③SDS score: after treatment, the SDS scores were (50.71 ± 2.70) points and (53.15 ± 2.25) points in the acupuncture group and the medication group, respectively, which was significantly lower than that before treatment in the two groups (both P < 0.05); and the difference in the score was significant between the two group (P < 0.05). In the follow-up, the score of the acupuncture group was (52.57 ± 3.72) points and it was (56.60 ± 2.42) points in the medication group, which was significantly lower than that before treatment in the two groups (both P < 0.05); and the difference in the score was significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). ④Comparison of serum NPY content: after treatment, the serum NPY content of the acupuncture group and the medication group were (7.08 ± 3.02) mmol/L and (9.89 ± 3.82) mmol/L, respectively, which was significantly lower than that before treatment within each group (both P < 0.05). The difference was significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). ⑤ Effective rate: after treatment, the total effective rate was 95.24% in the acupuncture group and 90.00% in the medication group, without statistically significant difference (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

bowls-unblocking and mind-regulating acupuncture therapy relieved the defecation-related symptoms, anxiety, and depression in IBS-C patients; and it was more effective on abdominal pain compared with mosapride citrate. Acupuncture therapy also had some long-term effect, which may be related to its regulatory effect on the serum NPY content.

Bowls unblocking and mind regulating acupuncture therapy for constipation induced irritable bowel syndrome: an exploratory randomized clinical trial
目的观察开窍调心针疗法对便秘型肠易激综合征(IBS-C)患者便秘、焦虑、抑郁及血清神经肽Y (NPY)含量的影响。方法将42例IBS-C患者随机分为疏通导脑针刺组(针刺组)和枸橼酸莫沙必利组(用药组),每组21例。治疗过程中,排除用药组1例,最终纳入20例进行统计分析;而针灸组有21例患者完成了试验。治疗前、治疗后及随访(全治疗后1个月)对两组患者进行克利夫兰临床便秘评分系统(CCS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分。比较治疗前后NPY含量的变化。结果①CCS总分:治疗后,针刺组和用药组的总分分别为(4.76±2.10)分和(5.60±1.88)分,均显著低于治疗前(P < 0.05);0.05);组间比较得分差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。随访中,针刺组总得分为(4.19±1.69)分,用药组总得分为(6.35±2.06)分。用药组得分高于同组治疗后得分(P <0.05),针刺组与用药组比较差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。②SAS评分:治疗后,针刺组SAS评分为(50.24±2.19)分,用药组SAS评分为(53.45±2.46)分,均低于治疗前(P < 0.05);0.05);两组间得分差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。随访时,针刺组和用药组的得分分别为(51.95±2.27)分和(54.55±1.67)分;均低于治疗前(P < 0.05);0.05),两组评分差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。③SDS评分:治疗后,针刺组SDS评分为(50.71±2.70)分,用药组SDS评分为(53.15±2.25)分,均显著低于治疗前(P <0.05);两组间得分差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。随访中,针刺组得分为(52.57±3.72)分,用药组得分为(56.60±2.42)分,均显著低于两组治疗前(P <0.05);两组间得分差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。④血清NPY含量比较:治疗后,针刺组和用药组血清NPY含量分别为(7.08±3.02)mmol/L和(9.89±3.82)mmol/L,各组均显著低于治疗前(P <0.05)。两组间差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。⑤有效率:治疗后,针刺组总有效率为95.24%,用药组总有效率为90.00%,差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论通肠调心针刺疗法可缓解IBS-C患者排便相关症状、焦虑和抑郁;与枸橼酸莫沙必利相比,它对腹痛更有效。针刺治疗也有一定的远期效果,这可能与其对血清NPY含量的调节作用有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion
World Journal of Acupuncture-Moxibustion INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
28.60%
发文量
1089
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: The focus of the journal includes, but is not confined to, clinical research, summaries of clinical experiences, experimental research and clinical reports on needling techniques, moxibustion techniques, acupuncture analgesia and acupuncture anesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信