Locally Sourced Seed is a Commonly Used but Widely Defined Practice for Grassland Restoration

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
M. Ahlering, Casey Binggeli
{"title":"Locally Sourced Seed is a Commonly Used but Widely Defined Practice for Grassland Restoration","authors":"M. Ahlering, Casey Binggeli","doi":"10.3996/jfwm-21-079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With continued losses, the need for grassland restoration increases, and other contemporary threats, such as climate change, may require new techniques for restorations to be successful and resilient. The conservation community has promoted the use of locally sourced seed for grassland restorations, but it is unclear how widespread the practice has become. Furthermore, rethinking how seed is sourced for grassland restorations is one potential strategy to facilitate climate change adaptation. We surveyed practitioners (anyone conducting grassland restorations) across the U.S. and Canada in 2017 regarding organizational, state/local government, or individual policies for using locally sourced seed in grassland restorations, how local was defined, and whether climate change was considered in these policies and decisions. We received 494 responses from 40 U.S. states and 5 Canadian provinces. Policies and individual decisions supporting locally sourced seed were common, with only 3.6% reporting no consideration of local seed sources in restorations. However, the definition of local varied widely with relatively large geographic areas, such as ecoregions, considered as a local source. Some practitioners considered climate change, but it was not the greatest concern when making seed-sourcing decisions. When they did consider climate change, their most reported strategy was expanding seed zones used for their seed mix. Although there was a heavy upper Midwest bias in the survey responses, the number and geographic scope of responses provides a snapshot of seed sourcing strategies used by practitioners. Our results suggest practitioners are concerned about maintaining adaptation, given the focus on local seed sources, and outreach could be useful to help practitioners incorporate climate adaptation strategies into seed sourcing practices.","PeriodicalId":49036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3996/jfwm-21-079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With continued losses, the need for grassland restoration increases, and other contemporary threats, such as climate change, may require new techniques for restorations to be successful and resilient. The conservation community has promoted the use of locally sourced seed for grassland restorations, but it is unclear how widespread the practice has become. Furthermore, rethinking how seed is sourced for grassland restorations is one potential strategy to facilitate climate change adaptation. We surveyed practitioners (anyone conducting grassland restorations) across the U.S. and Canada in 2017 regarding organizational, state/local government, or individual policies for using locally sourced seed in grassland restorations, how local was defined, and whether climate change was considered in these policies and decisions. We received 494 responses from 40 U.S. states and 5 Canadian provinces. Policies and individual decisions supporting locally sourced seed were common, with only 3.6% reporting no consideration of local seed sources in restorations. However, the definition of local varied widely with relatively large geographic areas, such as ecoregions, considered as a local source. Some practitioners considered climate change, but it was not the greatest concern when making seed-sourcing decisions. When they did consider climate change, their most reported strategy was expanding seed zones used for their seed mix. Although there was a heavy upper Midwest bias in the survey responses, the number and geographic scope of responses provides a snapshot of seed sourcing strategies used by practitioners. Our results suggest practitioners are concerned about maintaining adaptation, given the focus on local seed sources, and outreach could be useful to help practitioners incorporate climate adaptation strategies into seed sourcing practices.
就地种子是草地恢复中常用但定义广泛的一种方法
随着草地的持续损失,对草地恢复的需求增加,气候变化等其他当代威胁可能需要新的恢复技术来取得成功和有弹性。保护界提倡使用本地种子来恢复草原,但目前还不清楚这种做法有多普遍。此外,重新思考草地恢复的种子来源是促进气候变化适应的一个潜在策略。2017年,我们调查了美国和加拿大各地的从业者(任何进行草地恢复的人),内容涉及在草地恢复中使用当地种子的组织、州/地方政府或个人政策,如何定义当地,以及这些政策和决定是否考虑了气候变化。我们收到了来自美国40个州和加拿大5个省的494份回复。支持本地种子来源的政策和个人决定很常见,只有3.6%的人报告在恢复过程中不考虑本地种子来源。然而,当地的定义在相对较大的地理区域(如生态区域)中差异很大,被认为是当地的来源。一些从业者考虑了气候变化,但这并不是决定种子采购时最关心的问题。当他们确实考虑气候变化时,他们报道最多的策略是扩大用于种子混合的种子区。尽管在调查回复中存在严重的中西部偏上,但回复的数量和地理范围提供了从业者使用的种子采购策略的快照。我们的研究结果表明,由于关注当地种子来源,从业者关注保持适应,并且外展可能有助于从业者将气候适应策略纳入种子采购实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management
Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management encourages submission of original, high quality, English-language scientific papers on the practical application and integration of science to conservation and management of native North American fish, wildlife, plants and their habitats in the following categories: Articles, Notes, Surveys and Issues and Perspectives. Papers that do not relate directly to native North American fish, wildlife plants or their habitats may be considered if they highlight species that are closely related to, or conservation issues that are germane to, those in North America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信