Mentors as instructional coaches for new teachers: lessons learnt from the early career framework in England

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
C. Daly, P. Glegg, Beth Stiasny, M. Hardman, B. Taylor, C. Pillinger, Haira Gandolphi
{"title":"Mentors as instructional coaches for new teachers: lessons learnt from the early career framework in England","authors":"C. Daly, P. Glegg, Beth Stiasny, M. Hardman, B. Taylor, C. Pillinger, Haira Gandolphi","doi":"10.1108/ijmce-10-2022-0090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe paper provides analysis of the use of instructional coaching (IC) as a prevalent trend supporting new teachers in the English system and aims to inform ongoing policy development and implementation. The qualitative study examines mentors' conceptualisations and enactment of the role of instructional coach and the readiness of mentors to assume mentors' key stakeholder roles in the professional education of early career teachers (ECTs).Design/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviews with 37 mentors explored mentors' understandings and experiences of becoming instructional coaches as part of a pilot support initiative to support ECTs in England. Two rounds of interviews were conducted to generate data related to the first six months of mentoring on the programmes. Thematic analysis identified seven semantic themes which describe manifest content found within the data and identify mentors' perceptions of their role and practice as instructional coaches. Three latent themes were developed from mentors' accounts which indicate challenges in becoming an instructional coach in this context.FindingsConcern to apply IC “correctly” according to the programme models was a strong feature amongst both novice and experienced mentors. A key finding is the lack of explicit knowledge of professional learning pedagogies amongst mentors and insecure understanding of how new teachers learn. Assuming the role of instructional coach presented both benefits of having a “model” to follow and disadvantages in fostering limited and over-prescribed concepts and practices related to the learning of new teachers.Research limitations/implicationsThe study investigated mentors during the first six months of a pilot programme and the paper reports on analysis of one type of data. The research results may lack generalisability, and a longitudinal study is necessary to further explore the validity of the findings.Practical implicationsSustained, high-quality professional learning for mentors is crucial to mentors' role as instructional coaches to enable mentors to develop deep, critical understanding of how IC might support new teachers and how to exercise professional judgement in working with “models”. Judicious use of time and resource is needed to enable mentors to fulfil the potential of national mentoring programmes.Originality/valueThe study is timely in its examination of mentors that assume the role of instructional coach as one response to national policy development that makes support for ECTs mandatory. Such strategies have wide international relevance where the retention of new teachers is a policy priority.","PeriodicalId":45297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-10-2022-0090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe paper provides analysis of the use of instructional coaching (IC) as a prevalent trend supporting new teachers in the English system and aims to inform ongoing policy development and implementation. The qualitative study examines mentors' conceptualisations and enactment of the role of instructional coach and the readiness of mentors to assume mentors' key stakeholder roles in the professional education of early career teachers (ECTs).Design/methodology/approachSemi-structured interviews with 37 mentors explored mentors' understandings and experiences of becoming instructional coaches as part of a pilot support initiative to support ECTs in England. Two rounds of interviews were conducted to generate data related to the first six months of mentoring on the programmes. Thematic analysis identified seven semantic themes which describe manifest content found within the data and identify mentors' perceptions of their role and practice as instructional coaches. Three latent themes were developed from mentors' accounts which indicate challenges in becoming an instructional coach in this context.FindingsConcern to apply IC “correctly” according to the programme models was a strong feature amongst both novice and experienced mentors. A key finding is the lack of explicit knowledge of professional learning pedagogies amongst mentors and insecure understanding of how new teachers learn. Assuming the role of instructional coach presented both benefits of having a “model” to follow and disadvantages in fostering limited and over-prescribed concepts and practices related to the learning of new teachers.Research limitations/implicationsThe study investigated mentors during the first six months of a pilot programme and the paper reports on analysis of one type of data. The research results may lack generalisability, and a longitudinal study is necessary to further explore the validity of the findings.Practical implicationsSustained, high-quality professional learning for mentors is crucial to mentors' role as instructional coaches to enable mentors to develop deep, critical understanding of how IC might support new teachers and how to exercise professional judgement in working with “models”. Judicious use of time and resource is needed to enable mentors to fulfil the potential of national mentoring programmes.Originality/valueThe study is timely in its examination of mentors that assume the role of instructional coach as one response to national policy development that makes support for ECTs mandatory. Such strategies have wide international relevance where the retention of new teachers is a policy priority.
导师作为新教师的教学教练:从英国早期职业框架中吸取的教训
本文分析了教学辅导(IC)作为支持英语系统新教师的流行趋势的使用,旨在为正在进行的政策制定和实施提供信息。质性研究考察了导师在早期职业教师(ECTs)专业教育中对教学教练角色的概念化和制定,以及导师是否愿意承担导师的关键利益相关者角色。设计/方法/方法对37位导师进行了半结构化访谈,探讨了导师对成为教学教练的理解和经验,这是支持英国ECTs课程的试点支持计划的一部分。进行了两轮访谈,以产生与方案头六个月指导有关的数据。专题分析确定了七个语义主题,这些主题描述了数据中发现的明显内容,并确定了导师对其作为教学教练的角色和实践的看法。从导师的叙述中发展出三个潜在主题,表明在这种情况下成为教学教练的挑战。在新手和有经验的导师中,关注根据项目模型“正确”应用IC是一个强烈的特征。一个关键的发现是,导师对专业学习教学法缺乏明确的认识,对新教师如何学习的理解缺乏保障。承担教学教练的角色既有可以效仿的“榜样”的好处,也有不利于培养与新教师学习相关的有限和过度规定的概念和实践的缺点。研究的局限性/意义这项研究在试点项目的前六个月对导师进行了调查,论文报告了对一种数据的分析。研究结果可能缺乏普遍性,有必要进行纵向研究以进一步探讨研究结果的有效性。对导师来说,持续的、高质量的专业学习对于导师作为教学教练的角色至关重要,它使导师能够深入、批判性地理解IC如何支持新教师,以及如何在与“模型”合作时进行专业判断。需要明智地利用时间和资源,使导师能够发挥国家指导方案的潜力。原创性/价值这项研究对承担教学教练角色的导师进行了及时的审查,作为对国家政策发展的一种回应,这些政策发展要求对ECTs提供强制性支持。这些战略具有广泛的国际意义,因为保留新教师是一项优先政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education (IJMCE) publishes cutting edge research, theoretical accounts and emerging issues of mentoring and coaching in educational contexts, including schools, colleges and universities. IJMCE provides global insights and critical accounts of how mentoring and coaching are evolving on a global platform evidencing their situated nature and generic characteristics. This unique journal highlights what is recognised as effective and less effective practice in specific contexts, as well as demonstrating why this is so and discussing possible transferability to other contexts. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: Pre-service teacher education, New teacher induction and early professional learning, Teachers’ CPD provision, Educational technology provision, Educational leadership, Pre-school education and care, School/FE and HE education, Undergraduate student tuition, Postgraduate student tuition, Educational consultancy services, Children’s support services, Adult learning services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信