The Black Sea Region as a Conflict Space in the Discourse of Foreign Think Tanks of 2018–2021

IF 0.4 Q3 AREA STUDIES
Olga A. Moskalenko, A. Irkhin, Natalya E. Kabanova
{"title":"The Black Sea Region as a Conflict Space in the Discourse of Foreign Think Tanks of 2018–2021","authors":"Olga A. Moskalenko, A. Irkhin, Natalya E. Kabanova","doi":"10.15507/2413-1407.119.030.202202.258-277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The strengthening of Russia’s subjectivity in the Black Sea region makes it the center of the Western media and expert-analytical agenda. The authors of the study aim to define the mechanisms of metaphorical construction of the Black Sea region as a space of conflict in the discourse of the Western think tanks.\n\nMaterials and Methods. The reports of the leading Western think tanks developing the region concept are used as research materials. The methodological basis of the study is a systematic approach that combines the methods of political linguistics and geopolitical analysis and synthesis. The authors use the methods of discourse analysis to interpret the materials of foreign think tanks devoted to the study of the region, and based on the definition of dominant metaphorical models in the discourse of the Black Sea region, consider possible scenarios for the leading actors in the region.\n\nResults. The narratives of the leading American, European and British think tanks are considered and the main metaphorical models characterizing the geopolitical processes in the region are highlighted. The American discourse is dominated by the sports metaphor and its subspecies associated with gambling: the region is perceived as a space of competition, but not war, as evidenced by the lack of military metaphor, which, however, appears in the narratives of the European experts. The Black Sea region is a platform, a springboard for the projection of Russian power in the Mediterranean, which is realized through metaphors with the component “aggressive”. For the British, the Black Sea region is metaphorized as a space of information warfare.\n\nDiscussion and Conclusion. There are two main types of perception of the Black Sea region as a geopolitical unit by the Western think tanks: the American think tanks see it as a space of global competition of the great powers; the Great Britain has made the Black Sea region a platform for a return to the global arena of Global Britain by drawing on the rhetoric of universal values. The materials of the article and the methodology may be useful for information and analytical support of the foreign policy of the Western countries and for design of response from part of Russia under the condition of intensification of contest of the main Black Sea region actors","PeriodicalId":53833,"journal":{"name":"Regionologiya-Regionology Russian Journal of Regional Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regionologiya-Regionology Russian Journal of Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15507/2413-1407.119.030.202202.258-277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction. The strengthening of Russia’s subjectivity in the Black Sea region makes it the center of the Western media and expert-analytical agenda. The authors of the study aim to define the mechanisms of metaphorical construction of the Black Sea region as a space of conflict in the discourse of the Western think tanks. Materials and Methods. The reports of the leading Western think tanks developing the region concept are used as research materials. The methodological basis of the study is a systematic approach that combines the methods of political linguistics and geopolitical analysis and synthesis. The authors use the methods of discourse analysis to interpret the materials of foreign think tanks devoted to the study of the region, and based on the definition of dominant metaphorical models in the discourse of the Black Sea region, consider possible scenarios for the leading actors in the region. Results. The narratives of the leading American, European and British think tanks are considered and the main metaphorical models characterizing the geopolitical processes in the region are highlighted. The American discourse is dominated by the sports metaphor and its subspecies associated with gambling: the region is perceived as a space of competition, but not war, as evidenced by the lack of military metaphor, which, however, appears in the narratives of the European experts. The Black Sea region is a platform, a springboard for the projection of Russian power in the Mediterranean, which is realized through metaphors with the component “aggressive”. For the British, the Black Sea region is metaphorized as a space of information warfare. Discussion and Conclusion. There are two main types of perception of the Black Sea region as a geopolitical unit by the Western think tanks: the American think tanks see it as a space of global competition of the great powers; the Great Britain has made the Black Sea region a platform for a return to the global arena of Global Britain by drawing on the rhetoric of universal values. The materials of the article and the methodology may be useful for information and analytical support of the foreign policy of the Western countries and for design of response from part of Russia under the condition of intensification of contest of the main Black Sea region actors
2018-2021年国外智库话语中的黑海地区冲突空间
介绍。俄罗斯在黑海地区主体性的增强使其成为西方媒体和专家分析议程的中心。本研究旨在界定西方智库话语中黑海地区作为冲突空间的隐喻建构机制。材料与方法。发展区域概念的西方领先智库的报告被用作研究材料。本研究的方法论基础是将政治语言学和地缘政治分析与综合相结合的系统方法。作者运用话语分析的方法,对致力于该地区研究的国外智库的资料进行解读,并在定义黑海地区话语中占主导地位的隐喻模式的基础上,考虑了该地区主要行动者可能出现的情景。本文考虑了美国、欧洲和英国主要智库的叙述,并强调了表征该地区地缘政治进程的主要隐喻模式。美国人的话语被体育隐喻及其与赌博相关的亚种所主导:该地区被视为竞争空间,而不是战争空间,这一点从缺乏军事隐喻就可以证明,然而,在欧洲专家的叙述中却出现了军事隐喻。黑海地区是俄罗斯力量在地中海投射的一个平台,一个跳板,这是通过带有“侵略性”成分的隐喻实现的。对英国人来说,黑海地区被比喻为信息战的空间。讨论与结论。西方智库对黑海地区作为一个地缘政治单元的看法主要有两种:美国智库将其视为大国的全球竞争空间;英国利用普遍价值的修辞,使黑海地区成为一个重返全球英国舞台的平台。本文的材料和方法可能有助于为西方国家的外交政策提供信息和分析支持,并在黑海地区主要行为体竞争加剧的情况下设计俄罗斯部分地区的反应
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信