Commenting on Brand Posts during a Crisis: The Relationship between Context-Induced Moods and Brand Message Processing across Three Social Media Platforms

IF 10.2 Q1 Social Sciences
Yang Feng, Linwan Wu
{"title":"Commenting on Brand Posts during a Crisis: The Relationship between Context-Induced Moods and Brand Message Processing across Three Social Media Platforms","authors":"Yang Feng, Linwan Wu","doi":"10.1080/15252019.2021.1994060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Within the context of COVID-19, this study examines the relationship between context-induced moods and consumers’ responses to two different types of brand posts on social media: profit-driven posts and public-driven posts. Using both social media data (24,578 user comments on 14 brand posts on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter) and survey data (356 subjects recruited from Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk), we found that across all three social media platforms (i.e., Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter), the more negative mood one was in when using a social media platform during the pandemic, the more likely one would leave a comment to praise the company endorser of the public-driven post (comment type 5) as opposed to leaving a comment to discuss serious issues, shedding light on the prediction of negative-state relief model. By contrast, across all three social media platforms, there is no relationship between context-induced moods and types of comments people leave on a profit-driven brand post. We provide theoretical, practical, and methodological implications for future research.","PeriodicalId":37217,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Interactive Advertising","volume":"21 1","pages":"243 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Interactive Advertising","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15252019.2021.1994060","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Within the context of COVID-19, this study examines the relationship between context-induced moods and consumers’ responses to two different types of brand posts on social media: profit-driven posts and public-driven posts. Using both social media data (24,578 user comments on 14 brand posts on Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter) and survey data (356 subjects recruited from Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk), we found that across all three social media platforms (i.e., Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter), the more negative mood one was in when using a social media platform during the pandemic, the more likely one would leave a comment to praise the company endorser of the public-driven post (comment type 5) as opposed to leaving a comment to discuss serious issues, shedding light on the prediction of negative-state relief model. By contrast, across all three social media platforms, there is no relationship between context-induced moods and types of comments people leave on a profit-driven brand post. We provide theoretical, practical, and methodological implications for future research.
危机中的品牌帖子评论:三个社交媒体平台的语境诱导情绪与品牌信息处理之间的关系
摘要:在新冠肺炎疫情背景下,本研究考察了情境诱导情绪与消费者对两种不同类型的社交媒体品牌帖子(利润驱动型帖子和公众驱动型帖子)的反应之间的关系。使用社交媒体数据(24,578名用户对Facebook、Instagram和Twitter上14个品牌帖子的评论)和调查数据(从亚马逊的Mechanical Turk招募的356名受试者),我们发现,在所有三个社交媒体平台(即Facebook、Instagram和Twitter)中,在疫情期间使用社交媒体平台时,人们的情绪越消极,人们更有可能在公众驱动的帖子(评论类型5)下留言赞美公司代言人,而不是讨论严肃问题,这有助于预测消极状态缓解模型。相比之下,在所有三个社交媒体平台上,情境诱导的情绪与人们在利润驱动的品牌帖子上留下的评论类型之间没有关系。我们为未来的研究提供理论、实践和方法上的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Interactive Advertising
Journal of Interactive Advertising Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书