Tactile acuity improves during acute experimental pain of the limb.

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Pain Reports Pub Date : 2023-08-03 eCollection Date: 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000001091
Judith Paredes Sanchez, Morgan Titmus, Hollie Lawson-Smith, Flavia Di Pietro
{"title":"Tactile acuity improves during acute experimental pain of the limb.","authors":"Judith Paredes Sanchez, Morgan Titmus, Hollie Lawson-Smith, Flavia Di Pietro","doi":"10.1097/PR9.0000000000001091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chronic pain is associated with poor tactile acuity, commonly measured with the 2-point discrimination (TPD) test. Although poor tactile acuity across chronic pain conditions is well established, less is known in acute pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Recent conflicting findings in experimentally induced neck and back pain led us to conduct a TPD investigation in experimentally induced limb pain. We hypothesised altered TPD during experimental upper limb pain, but we did not speculate on the direction of the change.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty healthy subjects immersed their dominant hand in a circulating cold-water bath at 7°C (cold pressor test [CPT]). Two-point discrimination was measured at baseline (pre-CPT), during pain (during-CPT), and after withdrawal from the water (post-CPT) in 3 different sites: (1) the dominant forearm, (2) dominant arm and (3) contralateral forearm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant main effect of time (F<sub>(2,56)</sub> = 4.45, <i>P</i> = 0.02, <math><mrow><msubsup><mi>η</mi><mi>p</mi><mn>2</mn></msubsup></mrow></math> = 0.14) on TPD; in all 3 sites, TPD values decreased (ie, tactile acuity improved) during pain. Interestingly, the contralateral forearm followed a similar pattern to the dominant (ie, painful) forearm, and furthermore was the only site that exhibited any correlation with pain, albeit in an intriguing direction (<i>r</i> = 0.57, <i>P</i> = 0.001), ie, the greater the pain the worse the tactile acuity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The improvements in tactile acuity during experimentally induced limb pain may reflect a protective response. The changes in the corresponding site in the contralateral limb may reflect a protective spinal cross talk. Such a response, together with the interesting relationship between tactile acuity and pain, warrant further inquiry.</p>","PeriodicalId":52189,"journal":{"name":"Pain Reports","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10789456/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PR9.0000000000001091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Chronic pain is associated with poor tactile acuity, commonly measured with the 2-point discrimination (TPD) test. Although poor tactile acuity across chronic pain conditions is well established, less is known in acute pain.

Objective: Recent conflicting findings in experimentally induced neck and back pain led us to conduct a TPD investigation in experimentally induced limb pain. We hypothesised altered TPD during experimental upper limb pain, but we did not speculate on the direction of the change.

Methods: Thirty healthy subjects immersed their dominant hand in a circulating cold-water bath at 7°C (cold pressor test [CPT]). Two-point discrimination was measured at baseline (pre-CPT), during pain (during-CPT), and after withdrawal from the water (post-CPT) in 3 different sites: (1) the dominant forearm, (2) dominant arm and (3) contralateral forearm.

Results: Repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant main effect of time (F(2,56) = 4.45, P = 0.02, ηp2 = 0.14) on TPD; in all 3 sites, TPD values decreased (ie, tactile acuity improved) during pain. Interestingly, the contralateral forearm followed a similar pattern to the dominant (ie, painful) forearm, and furthermore was the only site that exhibited any correlation with pain, albeit in an intriguing direction (r = 0.57, P = 0.001), ie, the greater the pain the worse the tactile acuity.

Conclusion: The improvements in tactile acuity during experimentally induced limb pain may reflect a protective response. The changes in the corresponding site in the contralateral limb may reflect a protective spinal cross talk. Such a response, together with the interesting relationship between tactile acuity and pain, warrant further inquiry.

急性实验性肢体疼痛时触觉敏锐度的提高
文本中提供了补充数字内容。在实验诱导的上肢疼痛过程中,触觉敏锐度得到了改善,不仅在疼痛区域,而且在对侧无痛肢体的对称部位。摘要简介:慢性疼痛与触觉敏锐度差有关,通常用两点辨别(TPD)测试来测量。尽管慢性疼痛条件下触觉敏锐度差的问题已经得到了很好的证实,但对急性疼痛的了解却很少。目的:最近在实验诱导的颈部和背部疼痛中的相互矛盾的发现使我们对实验诱导的肢体疼痛进行了TPD研究。我们假设在实验性上肢疼痛期间TPD发生了变化,但我们没有推测变化的方向。方法:30名健康受试者将其惯用手浸入7°C的循环冷水浴中(冷加压试验[CTP])。在基线(CPT前)、疼痛期间(CPT期间)和出水后(CPT后)的3个不同部位测量两点辨别:(1)优势前臂、(2)优势臂和(3)对侧前臂。结果:重复测量方差分析显示时间对TPD有显著的主要影响(F(2,56)=4.45,P=0.02,ηp2=0.14);在所有3个部位中,TPD值在疼痛过程中降低(即触觉敏锐度提高)。有趣的是,对侧前臂遵循与优势前臂(即疼痛)相似的模式,而且是唯一表现出与疼痛相关的部位,尽管方向很有趣(r=0.57,P=0.001),即疼痛越大,触觉敏锐度越差。结论:实验性肢体疼痛过程中触觉敏锐度的改善可能反映了一种保护反应。对侧肢体中相应部位的变化可能反映出保护性脊椎串扰。这种反应,再加上触觉敏锐度和疼痛之间有趣的关系,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Reports
Pain Reports Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.10%
发文量
93
审稿时长
8 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信