An Update on Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions in HIV/AIDS

IF 1.6 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatopathology Pub Date : 2019-06-26 DOI:10.1159/000496389
K. Hoosen, A. Mosam, N. Dlova, W. Grayson
{"title":"An Update on Adverse Cutaneous Drug Reactions in HIV/AIDS","authors":"K. Hoosen, A. Mosam, N. Dlova, W. Grayson","doi":"10.1159/000496389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The global mortality from HIV and the cutaneous burden of infective, inflammatory and malignant diseases in the setting of AIDS have significantly declined following the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Regrettably, there has been a contemporaneous escalation in the incidence of adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDR), with studies attesting that HIV-positive individuals are a hundred times more susceptible to drug reactions than the general population, and advanced immunodeficiency portending an even greater risk. Several variables are accountable for this amplified risk in HIV. Summary: Adverse reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are the most common, increasing from approximately 2–8% in the general population over to 43% amongst HIV-positive individuals to approximately 69% in subjects with AIDS. Antituberculosis drugs and antiretrovirals are also well-known instigators of ACDR. Cutaneous reactions range from mild morbilliform eruptions to severe, life-threatening manifestations in the form of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Histological features vary from vacuolar interface changes to full-thickness epidermal necrosis with subepidermal blister formation. A precipitous diagnosis of the ACDR, clinically and histologically if necessary, together with the isolation of the causative drug is critical. The identification process, however, is often complex and multifaceted due to polypharmacy and inconclusive data on which drugs are the most likely offending agents, especially against the background of tuberculosis co-infection. Key Messages: Whilst milder cutaneous reactions are treated symptomatically, severe reactions mandate immediate treatment discontinuation without rechallenge. Further studies are required to establish safe rechallenge guidelines in resource-limited settings with a high HIV and tuberculosis prevalence.","PeriodicalId":42885,"journal":{"name":"Dermatopathology","volume":"6 1","pages":"111 - 125"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000496389","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatopathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000496389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: The global mortality from HIV and the cutaneous burden of infective, inflammatory and malignant diseases in the setting of AIDS have significantly declined following the advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy. Regrettably, there has been a contemporaneous escalation in the incidence of adverse cutaneous drug reactions (ACDR), with studies attesting that HIV-positive individuals are a hundred times more susceptible to drug reactions than the general population, and advanced immunodeficiency portending an even greater risk. Several variables are accountable for this amplified risk in HIV. Summary: Adverse reactions to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole are the most common, increasing from approximately 2–8% in the general population over to 43% amongst HIV-positive individuals to approximately 69% in subjects with AIDS. Antituberculosis drugs and antiretrovirals are also well-known instigators of ACDR. Cutaneous reactions range from mild morbilliform eruptions to severe, life-threatening manifestations in the form of Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis. Histological features vary from vacuolar interface changes to full-thickness epidermal necrosis with subepidermal blister formation. A precipitous diagnosis of the ACDR, clinically and histologically if necessary, together with the isolation of the causative drug is critical. The identification process, however, is often complex and multifaceted due to polypharmacy and inconclusive data on which drugs are the most likely offending agents, especially against the background of tuberculosis co-infection. Key Messages: Whilst milder cutaneous reactions are treated symptomatically, severe reactions mandate immediate treatment discontinuation without rechallenge. Further studies are required to establish safe rechallenge guidelines in resource-limited settings with a high HIV and tuberculosis prevalence.
HIV/AIDS患者皮肤药物不良反应的最新进展
背景:随着高活性抗逆转录病毒疗法的出现,全球艾滋病毒死亡率和艾滋病感染、炎症和恶性疾病的皮肤负担显著下降。令人遗憾的是,同时皮肤药物不良反应(ACDR)的发生率也在上升,研究证明hiv阳性个体对药物反应的易感性是一般人群的100倍,晚期免疫缺陷预示着更大的风险。有几个变量导致艾滋病毒风险增加。摘要:甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑的不良反应最为常见,从一般人群的约2-8%增加到艾滋病毒阳性个体的43%,再到艾滋病患者的约69%。众所周知,抗结核药物和抗逆转录病毒药物也是ACDR的诱因。皮肤反应范围从轻微的麻疹样疹到严重的危及生命的史蒂文斯-约翰逊综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解。组织学特征从空泡界面改变到全层表皮坏死伴皮下水疱形成不等。如有必要,在临床和组织学上迅速诊断ACDR,并分离致病药物是至关重要的。然而,由于多种药物和关于哪些药物是最可能的致病因子的不确定数据,特别是在结核病合并感染的背景下,识别过程往往是复杂和多方面的。关键信息:虽然轻微的皮肤反应可以对症治疗,但严重的反应需要立即停药而无需重新挑战。在艾滋病毒和结核病高流行的资源有限的环境中,需要进一步研究制定安全的再挑战指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatopathology
Dermatopathology DERMATOLOGY-
自引率
5.30%
发文量
39
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信