Patient Science: Citizen Science Involving Chronically Ill People as Co-Researchers

N. Heyen, J. Gardecki, D. Eidt-Koch, M. Schlangen, Sophie Pauly, Olaf Eickmeier, T. Wagner, T. Bratan
{"title":"Patient Science: Citizen Science Involving Chronically Ill People as Co-Researchers","authors":"N. Heyen, J. Gardecki, D. Eidt-Koch, M. Schlangen, Sophie Pauly, Olaf Eickmeier, T. Wagner, T. Bratan","doi":"10.35844/001c.35634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Citizen science projects in health-related research usually follow a crowdsourcing approach where laypersons primarily have a supplying role in data collection. By contrast, this article presents an approach on a much higher engagement level (co-creation) where a team of professional and citizen scientists jointly plans, implements, and evaluates a scientific study on a chronic disease from which the citizen (patient) scientists themselves suffer. We call this approach patient science; it systematically makes use of the patients’ expertise of living with the disease. This article describes the pilot project and conceptual differences compared to other participatory approaches in medical and health research. It elaborates on the implications of involving chronically ill people as co-researchers and, finally, reflects on the benefits and challenges of patient science.","PeriodicalId":73887,"journal":{"name":"Journal of participatory research methods","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of participatory research methods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35844/001c.35634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Citizen science projects in health-related research usually follow a crowdsourcing approach where laypersons primarily have a supplying role in data collection. By contrast, this article presents an approach on a much higher engagement level (co-creation) where a team of professional and citizen scientists jointly plans, implements, and evaluates a scientific study on a chronic disease from which the citizen (patient) scientists themselves suffer. We call this approach patient science; it systematically makes use of the patients’ expertise of living with the disease. This article describes the pilot project and conceptual differences compared to other participatory approaches in medical and health research. It elaborates on the implications of involving chronically ill people as co-researchers and, finally, reflects on the benefits and challenges of patient science.
病人科学:以慢性病患者为联合研究者的公民科学
健康相关研究中的公民科学项目通常采用众包方法,非专业人员主要在数据收集中发挥供应作用。相比之下,本文提出了一种更高参与水平(共同创造)的方法,由专业科学家和公民科学家组成的团队共同规划、实施和评估一项关于公民(患者)科学家自身所患慢性病的科学研究。我们称这种方法为病人科学;它系统地利用了患者与疾病共存的专业知识。本文介绍了试点项目以及与其他参与式医疗卫生研究方法相比的概念差异。它详细阐述了让慢性病患者作为联合研究人员参与的意义,并最终反思了患者科学的好处和挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信