Exploring Different Patterns of Gender Ideology across College Majors

Q2 Social Sciences
V. Patel, S. Young, C. Schleifer, Simon G. Brauer
{"title":"Exploring Different Patterns of Gender Ideology across College Majors","authors":"V. Patel, S. Young, C. Schleifer, Simon G. Brauer","doi":"10.1080/00380237.2023.2166178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Research shows that college education and college major are related to attitudes about gender. However, little research has focused on within-major gender differences, and studies that do frequently rely on small, college-specific samples. Larger, national datasets frequently do not include information on college major and are often cross-sectional, making it difficult to account for selection processes. Using the General Social Survey and several advanced statistical analyses that partially address selection effects, we ask: “Do patterns of gender ideology vary among those who have completed different college majors?” We find that men with degrees in education are more egalitarian than other men, while women with degrees in primarily male-dominated fields like mathematics and engineering have more egalitarian views than other women. Conditioning on college major selection, we find that women with degrees in professional areas, health, humanities, and technology, engineering, and mathematics (TEM) fields are more egalitarian than men with the same degree, while men with degrees in education have more egalitarian gender ideologies than women with the same degree.","PeriodicalId":39368,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Focus","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Focus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00380237.2023.2166178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Research shows that college education and college major are related to attitudes about gender. However, little research has focused on within-major gender differences, and studies that do frequently rely on small, college-specific samples. Larger, national datasets frequently do not include information on college major and are often cross-sectional, making it difficult to account for selection processes. Using the General Social Survey and several advanced statistical analyses that partially address selection effects, we ask: “Do patterns of gender ideology vary among those who have completed different college majors?” We find that men with degrees in education are more egalitarian than other men, while women with degrees in primarily male-dominated fields like mathematics and engineering have more egalitarian views than other women. Conditioning on college major selection, we find that women with degrees in professional areas, health, humanities, and technology, engineering, and mathematics (TEM) fields are more egalitarian than men with the same degree, while men with degrees in education have more egalitarian gender ideologies than women with the same degree.
大学生性别意识形态的差异研究
研究表明,大学教育和大学专业与性别观念有关。然而,很少有研究关注主要性别差异,而且这些研究经常依赖于针对大学的小样本。更大的国家数据集通常不包括大学专业的信息,而且往往是横向的,这使得很难解释选拔过程。利用综合社会调查和几项部分针对选拔效应的高级统计分析,我们问道:“完成不同大学专业的人的性别意识形态模式是否不同?”我们发现,拥有教育学位的男性比其他男性更平等,而在数学和工程等以男性为主的领域拥有学位的女性比其他女性更有平等主义的观点。以大学专业选择为条件,我们发现,拥有专业领域、健康、人文、技术、工程和数学(TEM)学位的女性比拥有相同学位的男性更平等,而拥有教育学位的男性比拥有相同学历的女性有更平等的性别意识形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociological Focus
Sociological Focus Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信