KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA PGMI DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKA

Nida Jarmita
{"title":"KEMAMPUAN MAHASISWA PGMI DALAM MEMECAHKAN MASALAH GEOMETRI DITINJAU DARI PERBEDAAN KEMAMPUAN MATEMATIKA","authors":"Nida Jarmita","doi":"10.22373/jppm.v2i2.4504","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is an explorative study using qualitative approach that aims to describe the ability of students in solving geometry problems in terms of differences in mathematical skills. Students' problem-solving capabilities were reviewed based on Polya's troubleshooting techniques, namely: understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back to review the results obtained. The subjects of the study are three students from Department of Primary School Teacher Education (PGMI) of Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. The research process begins by giving a mathematics competency test to the student from a class unit, followed by selecting one student from each group, respectively from high math skills, medium math skills, and low math skills. These three selected subjects were assigned geometry-solving tasks and task-based interviews. The validity of data were checked using time triangulation. The results showed that the subject of high mathematical skill was able to use all 4 steps to solve the problem and provide correct answer. The subject of medium mathematical skill was capable of using the 4 steps of Polya's technique but also was less accurate in giving answers. Subjects of low math skill are able to use only 3 steps but are not correct in giving answers.","PeriodicalId":34144,"journal":{"name":"Al Khawarizmi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al Khawarizmi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22373/jppm.v2i2.4504","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is an explorative study using qualitative approach that aims to describe the ability of students in solving geometry problems in terms of differences in mathematical skills. Students' problem-solving capabilities were reviewed based on Polya's troubleshooting techniques, namely: understanding the problem, devising a plan, carrying out the plan, and looking back to review the results obtained. The subjects of the study are three students from Department of Primary School Teacher Education (PGMI) of Faculty of Tarbiyah and Teacher Training, Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. The research process begins by giving a mathematics competency test to the student from a class unit, followed by selecting one student from each group, respectively from high math skills, medium math skills, and low math skills. These three selected subjects were assigned geometry-solving tasks and task-based interviews. The validity of data were checked using time triangulation. The results showed that the subject of high mathematical skill was able to use all 4 steps to solve the problem and provide correct answer. The subject of medium mathematical skill was capable of using the 4 steps of Polya's technique but also was less accurate in giving answers. Subjects of low math skill are able to use only 3 steps but are not correct in giving answers.
PGMI经理在处理材料开发中研究的几何形状方面的发展
本研究是一项探索性研究,采用定性方法,旨在从数学技能的差异来描述学生解决几何问题的能力。根据Polya的疑难解答技巧,对学生解决问题的能力进行了评估,即:理解问题、制定计划、执行计划,以及回顾所获得的结果。这项研究的对象是班达亚齐伊斯兰国家大学Tarbiyah和教师培训学院小学教师教育系的三名学生。研究过程首先对每个班级的学生进行数学能力测试,然后从每组中分别从高数学技能、中等数学技能和低数学技能中选择一名学生。这三名被选中的受试者被分配了解决几何问题的任务和基于任务的访谈。使用时间三角测量法检查数据的有效性。结果表明,数学技能高的被试能够运用全部4个步骤来解决问题,并给出正确的答案。中等数学技能的科目能够使用波利亚技术的4个步骤,但在给出答案时也不太准确。数学水平低的受试者只能使用3个步骤,但在给出答案时并不正确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信