Michał Jurczyk, Andrzej Boryczko, A. Furgała, Adrian Poniatowski, A. Surdacki, K. Gil
{"title":"Past strong experiences determine acute cardiovascular autonomic responses to acoustic stress.","authors":"Michał Jurczyk, Andrzej Boryczko, A. Furgała, Adrian Poniatowski, A. Surdacki, K. Gil","doi":"10.24425/fmc.2020.136206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nStress is a major risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. We hypothesized that past strong experiences might modulate acute CV autonomic responses to an unexpected acoustic stimulus. A i m: The study's aim was to compare acute CV autonomic responses to acoustic stress between students with and without a past strong experience associated with the acoustic stimulus.\n\n\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\nTwenty five healthy young volunteers - medical and non-medical students - were included in the study. CV hemodynamic parameters, heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) variability were assessed for 10 min at rest and for 10 min after two different acoustic stimuli: a standard sound signal and a specific sound signal used during a practical anatomy exam (so-called \"pins\").\n\n\nRESULTS\nBoth sounds stimulated the autonomic nervous system. The \"pins\" signal caused a stronger increase in HR in medical students (69 ± 10 vs. 73 ± 13 bpm, p = 0.004) when compared to non-medical students (69 ± 6 vs. 70 ± 10, p = 0.695). Rises in diastolic BP, observed 15 seconds after sound stressors, were more pronounced after the \"pins\" sound than after the standard sound signal only in medical students (3.1% and 1.4% vs. 3% and 4.4%), which was also reflected by low-frequency diastolic BP variability (medical students: 6.2 ± 1.6 vs. 4.1 ± 0.8 ms2, p = 0.04; non-medical students: 6.0 ± 4.3 vs. 4.1 ± 2.6 ms2, p = 0.06).\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nThe \"pins\" sound, which medical students remembered from their anatomy practical exam, provoked greater sympathetic activity in the medical student group than in their non-medical peers. Thus, past strong experiences modulate CV autonomic responses to acute acoustic stress.","PeriodicalId":12106,"journal":{"name":"Folia medica Cracoviensia","volume":"60 4 1","pages":"79-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Folia medica Cracoviensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/fmc.2020.136206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Stress is a major risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. We hypothesized that past strong experiences might modulate acute CV autonomic responses to an unexpected acoustic stimulus. A i m: The study's aim was to compare acute CV autonomic responses to acoustic stress between students with and without a past strong experience associated with the acoustic stimulus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Twenty five healthy young volunteers - medical and non-medical students - were included in the study. CV hemodynamic parameters, heart rate (HR), and blood pressure (BP) variability were assessed for 10 min at rest and for 10 min after two different acoustic stimuli: a standard sound signal and a specific sound signal used during a practical anatomy exam (so-called "pins").
RESULTS
Both sounds stimulated the autonomic nervous system. The "pins" signal caused a stronger increase in HR in medical students (69 ± 10 vs. 73 ± 13 bpm, p = 0.004) when compared to non-medical students (69 ± 6 vs. 70 ± 10, p = 0.695). Rises in diastolic BP, observed 15 seconds after sound stressors, were more pronounced after the "pins" sound than after the standard sound signal only in medical students (3.1% and 1.4% vs. 3% and 4.4%), which was also reflected by low-frequency diastolic BP variability (medical students: 6.2 ± 1.6 vs. 4.1 ± 0.8 ms2, p = 0.04; non-medical students: 6.0 ± 4.3 vs. 4.1 ± 2.6 ms2, p = 0.06).
CONCLUSIONS
The "pins" sound, which medical students remembered from their anatomy practical exam, provoked greater sympathetic activity in the medical student group than in their non-medical peers. Thus, past strong experiences modulate CV autonomic responses to acute acoustic stress.
背景:应激是心血管疾病的主要危险因素。我们假设过去强烈的经历可能会调节急性CV自主神经对意外声刺激的反应。A:这项研究的目的是比较有和没有与声刺激相关的强烈经验的学生对声应激的急性CV自主反应。材料和方法25名健康的年轻志愿者——医学院和非医学院的学生——被纳入研究。静息10分钟和两种不同声刺激后10分钟评估CV血流动力学参数、心率(HR)和血压(BP)变异性:标准声信号和实际解剖检查中使用的特定声信号(所谓的“针”)。结果两种声音均刺激自主神经系统。“针”信号导致医学生心率(69±10比73±13 bpm, p = 0.004)高于非医学生(69±6比70±10,p = 0.695)。在声音刺激后15秒,医学生的舒张压升高比标准声音信号后更明显(3.1%和1.4% vs. 3%和4.4%),这也反映在低频舒张压变异性上(医学生:6.2±1.6 vs. 4.1±0.8 ms2, p = 0.04;非医学生:6.0±4.3比4.1±2.6,p = 0.06)。结论医学生在解剖学实践考试中记住的“针”声,在医学生组中引起的交感神经活动大于非医学生组。因此,过去强烈的经验调节CV对急性声应激的自主反应。