{"title":"Restoration and Resilience: The Last Bourbons and the Revolutionary Past","authors":"Flavien Bertran de Balanda, Gérard Gengembre","doi":"10.21039/rsj.321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As early as 1795, immediately after the death of the young Louis XVII in his Parisian prison, the comte de Provence, brother of the late Louis XVI who had been executed in 1793, was hoping the course of history would prove him right. He opted to call himself Louis XVIII, a title which was made official nineteen years later when he became king. Proclaimed in the Déclaration de Vérone on 8 June 1795, in the midst of the Revolution, such an act implied that the Revolution was not happening, had never happened, and would never happen again. Our paper explores this new and ambivalent kind of resilience by examining three decisive moments during the reigns of Louis XVI’s two brothers, Louis XVIII (1814-1824) and Charles X (1824-1830): the First Restoration and the Hundred Days, with their curious institutional novelties and changes of hands; the early Second Restoration, when the game between the old and the new world seemed on and then over; and the first years of Charles X’s reign, when the tensions returned with a vengeance, probably climaxing in 1825 with the Compensation Act, known as “le milliard des émigrés.”","PeriodicalId":36175,"journal":{"name":"Royal Studies Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21039/rsj.321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As early as 1795, immediately after the death of the young Louis XVII in his Parisian prison, the comte de Provence, brother of the late Louis XVI who had been executed in 1793, was hoping the course of history would prove him right. He opted to call himself Louis XVIII, a title which was made official nineteen years later when he became king. Proclaimed in the Déclaration de Vérone on 8 June 1795, in the midst of the Revolution, such an act implied that the Revolution was not happening, had never happened, and would never happen again. Our paper explores this new and ambivalent kind of resilience by examining three decisive moments during the reigns of Louis XVI’s two brothers, Louis XVIII (1814-1824) and Charles X (1824-1830): the First Restoration and the Hundred Days, with their curious institutional novelties and changes of hands; the early Second Restoration, when the game between the old and the new world seemed on and then over; and the first years of Charles X’s reign, when the tensions returned with a vengeance, probably climaxing in 1825 with the Compensation Act, known as “le milliard des émigrés.”
早在1795年,年轻的路易十七在他的巴黎监狱里死后不久,普罗旺斯伯爵,已故的路易十六的兄弟,于1793年被处决,就希望历史的进程能证明他是正确的。他选择称自己为路易十八,这个头衔在19年后他成为国王时正式生效。1795年6月8日,在大革命的中期,在《dsamclaration de vsamrone》中宣布,这样的行为意味着革命没有发生,从来没有发生过,也永远不会再发生。我们的论文通过考察路易十六的两个兄弟——路易十八(1814-1824)和查理十世(1824-1830)统治期间的三个决定性时刻,探讨了这种新的矛盾的恢复力:第一次复辟和百日王朝,以及它们奇怪的制度新奇和易手;第二次复辟早期,新旧世界之间的博弈似乎开始了又结束了;查理十世统治的最初几年,紧张局势卷土重来,可能在1825年的《补偿法案》(le milliard des sammigracims)中达到了高潮。