Account sequences in emergency care discourse: Comparing conversations with simulated patients and manikins in training sessions

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice Pub Date : 2018-07-12 DOI:10.1558/JALPP.36884

K. Tsuchiya, F. Coffey, S. Timmons, Sarah Atkins, B. Baxendale, S. Adolphs

{"title":"Account sequences in emergency care discourse: Comparing conversations with simulated patients and manikins in training sessions","authors":"K. Tsuchiya, F. Coffey, S. Timmons, Sarah Atkins, B. Baxendale, S. Adolphs","doi":"10.1558/JALPP.36884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients is a key factor in medicine. This is particularly the case in emergency care. This article looks at how HCPs provide accounts of medical procedures to patients in emergency care scenarios, using video data of four training sessions, two conducted with simulated patients and two with a manikin. A comparison between these two types of simulation shows how HCPs give accounts in both modalities, which will eventually inform what modality to use for training HCPs with different learning aims. The practices of HCPs' giving accounts to a patient in emergency care training in the UK were analysed, using a corpus-driven discourse analysis. From the analysis, separate account sequences are identified: (1) HCPs' proposal of medical procedures to a patient; (2) HCPs' accounting of the procedure to a patient; and (3) acceptance or rejection by a patient. HCPs' accounting practices were observed in both cases but used less in the scenario with a manikin.","PeriodicalId":52122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/JALPP.36884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Effective communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients is a key factor in medicine. This is particularly the case in emergency care. This article looks at how HCPs provide accounts of medical procedures to patients in emergency care scenarios, using video data of four training sessions, two conducted with simulated patients and two with a manikin. A comparison between these two types of simulation shows how HCPs give accounts in both modalities, which will eventually inform what modality to use for training HCPs with different learning aims. The practices of HCPs' giving accounts to a patient in emergency care training in the UK were analysed, using a corpus-driven discourse analysis. From the analysis, separate account sequences are identified: (1) HCPs' proposal of medical procedures to a patient; (2) HCPs' accounting of the procedure to a patient; and (3) acceptance or rejection by a patient. HCPs' accounting practices were observed in both cases but used less in the scenario with a manikin.

查看原文本刊更多论文

急救话语中的叙述顺序：在训练课程中与模拟患者和人体模型的对话比较

医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)和患者之间的有效沟通是医学的关键因素。在紧急护理中尤其如此。本文使用四次培训课程的视频数据，研究医护人员如何在紧急护理场景中向患者提供医疗程序的描述，其中两次是与模拟患者进行的，两次是与人体模型进行的。这两种类型的模拟之间的比较显示了HCPs如何在两种模式下给出帐户，这将最终告知使用哪种模式来培训具有不同学习目标的HCPs。使用语料库驱动的话语分析，分析了HCPs在英国紧急护理培训中对患者的说明的实践。通过分析，确定了独立的账户序列:(1)HCPs对患者的医疗程序建议;(2)医务人员对病人的程序核算;(3)患者的接受或拒绝。在这两种情况下，都观察到医护人员的会计做法，但在有人体模型的情况下使用较少。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice was launched in 2004 (under the title Journal of Applied Linguistics) with the aim of advancing research and practice in applied linguistics as a principled and interdisciplinary endeavour. From Volume 7, the journal adopted the new title to reflect the continuation, expansion and re-specification of the field of applied linguistics as originally conceived. Moving away from a primary focus on research into language teaching/learning and second language acquisition, the education profession will remain a key site but one among many, with an active engagement of the journal moving to sites from a variety of other professional domains such as law, healthcare, counselling, journalism, business interpreting and translating, where applied linguists have major contributions to make. Accordingly, under the new title, the journal will reflexively foreground applied linguistics as professional practice. As before, each volume will contain a selection of special features such as editorials, specialist conversations, debates and dialogues on specific methodological themes, review articles, research notes and targeted special issues addressing key themes.